When speaking last night, I was dealing with a number of miscellaneous matters not related directly to any State company. Deputy Barrett raised the question of the possibility of oil spillage at Whiddy. We have been in constant contact with the Gulf Oil Company and also had the experience of the Torrey Canyon disaster: we sent officials of the Department to Cornwall to observe effects there and we have had talks with experts in this field. Every step will be taken by the Gulf Oil Company to prevent the undesirable effects of oil spillage.
For example, no flexible hose will be used. Instead, solid steel apparatus will be used, which is a considerable technical advance. Overall automatic control of the pumping will be effected by a skilled operator in a control tower. There will be a boom available to encircle completely any accidental spillage and there will be also permanently established at Whiddy four tugs with a high-power detergent operating apparatus. The cost of all this will be borne by the Gulf Oil Corporation. I wanted to make it clear that we are examining the matter in very great detail and to tell the House that the Gulf Oil Company are co-operating fully with the Department.
Deputy Barrett raised the question of liner traffic at Cork. Of course, the future of liner traffic at Cobh in this respect depends entirely on the decisions of the shipping companies. As the Deputy knows, the Cunard Line decided to sell all their liners except the Queen Elizabeth and this will probably mean a reduction in calls at Cork. The Holland-America Line, as far as I know, will maintain their calls at Cork. The future of regular passenger liner services across the Atlantic is impossible to define at the moment. One hears plans for very inexpensive liner services based on self-service cafeteria and bars. One hears many tentative plans for a type of traffic which declined during one period and appeared to be stabilised again but it would be difficult to hazard a guess of what lies in the future. Perhaps in such days as these, when air traffic is so frequent, many people may wish to relax during sea journeys. However, it would be impossible for me to say what the future holds.
Deputy Barrett asked a question in relation to the possibility of a ferry terminal at Cobh. It was found impossible to get adequate space at Cobh but the B & I decided to integrate their Cork operations, for economic reasons, in a new terminal at Tivoli and it is expected the ferry will carry cars, passengers, containers and livestock in the most economic fashion. B & I plan to run a new car ferry ship, which will also have passenger facilities, between Cork and Swansea and there will be road services between Swansea and London. The Swansea port authorities are preparing the port terminal. The distance by road will be a great deal shorter and the road facilities better than on the longer route to Fishguard.
There were vague comments on the position of Irish Shipping. I indicated in the course of my opening statement that Irish Shipping faced very low freight rates at different periods, followed by slight rises. As a shipping company, they carry the maximum Irish freight that is possible and economic. For example, they recently made a very satisfactory contract to carry fertilisers for an Irish company but they must also engage in tramp operations as in the case of other cargo liner companies. The shipping service has been subject to examination in the matters of management and cost and I think we can have every confidence that Irish Shipping are meeting the challenges which have to be faced by all cargo liner companies. I have every confidence in the company and the board. Repairs to Irish Shipping liners are carried out in Ireland, when possible, as I have told Deputies in reply to Parliamentary Questions.
Deputies referred to matters concerning aviation and one Deputy questioned the desirability of proposed hotel development near Dublin Airport. I consider this as being absolutely essential in the future, having regard to the expansion in air travel at Dublin Airport. Dublin Airport is situated close to a main arterial road and market research makes it quite clear that we need this hotel development in the area. I have no fear whatever that it will result in unfair competition with existing Dublin hotels.
Deputy Mullen and others asked for information about the leasing of aircraft by Aer Lingus and Aerlínte. Air transport in this country is subject to steep peaks and steep valleys. As I have stated on previous occasions, part of the story of Aer Lingus is the success achieved in spite of having a very low average fare paid by passengers on their European routes, particularly the British ones, and in spite of the fact that the transatlantic route is the shortest intercontinental portion of any major air carrier. There is a greater valley period during the winter than is the case with other intercontinental air carriers. The two Irish companies have to achieve a balance in their accounts in spite of these two adverse factors and it is very good business if Aerlínte can succeed in leasing aircraft during valley periods. The Irish aircraft companies have been pioneering in this business at times when they have no use for their aircraft. The directors of the board are quite satisfied that the financial return is worthwhile. I do not need to add that the terms of the leasing are naturally highly confidential.