Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 13 Dec 1977

Vol. 302 No. 8

Vote 9: Public Works and Buildings.

I move:

That a supplementary sum not exceeding £700,000 be granted to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of December, 1977, for the salaries and expenses of the Office of Public Works; for expenditure in respect of public buildings; for the maintenance of certain parks and public works; for the execution and maintenance of drainage and other engineering works; for expenditure arising from damage to the property of External Governments; and for payment of a grant-in-aid.

This Supplementary Estimate is necessary to meet increases in the cost of the services rendered by the Office of Public Works. The gross additional amount required, £1,219,000, is offset partly by estimated savings on certain subheads of the Vote, leaving a net requirement of £700,000.

The main item in the Supplementary Estimate is the additional sum of £600,000 required under subhead E for New Works, Alterations and Additions. The Office of Public Works has a large number of building and construction projects on hands at all stages of progress. With the Government emphasis on job creation and the allocation of additional money for that purpose as part of the 1977 Budget job-creation package, steps were taken to bring projects to the construction stage with all possible speed and contractors for works in progress were encouraged to expand their work forces to the optimum level. As a result of these measures and in spite of the long lead time involved in planning, trading procedures and so on, expenditure of £600,000 over and above the sum of £6,000,000 provided under this subhead in the original Estimates for 1977 is expected to have been incurred by the end of this year.

An additional amount of £336,000 is required for subhead H—Purchase and Maintenance of Engineering Plant and Machinery and Stores.

Practically all of this money is needed for the purchase of new plant for use on arterial drainage schemes. These schemes have a very high employment content and in order to keep them going at a reasonable level the purchase of new plant is vitally necessary.

Sums totalling £20,000 are required for subheads A2, B2 and C to cover additional administrative expenses, the main item being increases in the cost of postal and telephone services.

Subheads F2 and F4, for which additional sums totalling £138,000 are required, cover the cost of furnishing, heating and lighting State-owned property. Part of the increase is due to increased wages and costs and the remainder is due to increased demands which had to be met to maintain proper working conditions for State employees.

An additional amount of £60,000 is needed for subhead J.1, National Monuments, to cover increased wages and costs. Apart from providing a very valuable service in the field of conservation activity and archaeological research, the National Monuments service is a labour intensive one, providing employment in areas where it might otherwise not be available. A sum of £65,000 is required under subhead K—Appropriations-in-Aid—to cover an expected shortfall in receipts due to the fact that some major works being carried out on behalf of the Department of Posts and Telegraphs have not proceeded as rapidly as expected.

I have just a few questions. What the Parliamentary Secretary has just read is very similar to what his predecessor read on 28th April, 1977. Is this additional expenditure now required by the new Government or where does it arise?

The additional expenditure——

I suggest that Deputy Donnellan asks his questions or makes his statement and the Parliamentary Secretary will then reply. That is the only way we can proceed.

I do not want to make a long speech. I want to find out from the Parliamentary Secretary is this £700,000 money that was allocated by this Government since it took office.

Has Deputy Donnellan finished?

Maybe not.

I cannot call the Deputy again. He will have to ask his questions or make his statement.

I think the Chair is being unfair to me.

I am not being unfair. The Deputy may speak only once on this Estimate.

In that case I had better say what I have to say. When Deputy Begley, as Parliamentary Secretary, introduced the Estimate for the Office of Public Works he stated at column 1719 of Volume 298 of the Official Report:

In addition to this, the Government have since allocated to the Office of Public Works a further sum of £2,000,000 out of the additional £55.5 million being provided to improve job prospects following ratification of the new national pay agreement....

I trust the Parliamentary Secretary will be able to tell me whether this £700,000 to which he referred is part of this £ million.

In the original Estimate there was a shortfall of £1,219,000. There was then a saving of £519,000 and we are now bringing in a Supplementary Estimate for £700,000 which brings the total up to the £1,219,000.

With regard to the £2 million mentioned by the Deputy, the Office of Public Works were informed at the end of April that this money would be available for employment purposes. Of that £2 million we have spent £200,000 on drainage.

That is of the additional £2 million?

Yes. I want to clear up the position about the original Estimate. There was a shortfall.

I am not questioning the original Estimate. I am questioning the £2 million.

It is important to mention the original Estimate. As well as the shortfall to which I referred there was also a decrease in the 1976 Estimate amounting to £220,000.

The £2 million is disappearing very quickly.

I am trying to give an idea of the figures the Deputy has before him.

Would Deputy Donnellan give the Parliamentary Secretary a chance to get rid of this?

The £2 million was money that was not, of course, voted. However, we have spent £200,000 on drainage employing about 60 people and we have spent £20,000 on maintenance giving employment to 73 people.

I should also mention that we are now recruiting in the region of 35 apprentices for all categories of trade in the Board of Works. We have appealed to all contractors who are awarded contracts to try to employ more people so as to ensure a reasonable completion date. This is in the interests of giving more employment. I hope I have answered the Deputy's question and clarified the matter of the £600,000.

Vote put and agreed to.

Might I suggest that the House would agree to take Vote 52 which deals with the Estimate for the Office of the Minister for Economic Planning and Development and the remaining outstanding Votes?

I presume that is only salaries.

Barr
Roinn