Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 29 Apr 1982

Vol. 333 No. 9

Adjournment Debate. - Waterford Factory Redundancies Threat.

I thank the Chair for allowing me this question on the Adjournment. This is the second factory threatened with redundancies that I have mentioned here today. This is indicative of the very serious situation that exists in Waterford city and county. So far as employment is concerned Waterford has become a disaster area. In recent years we have seen the closure of a string of old established industries — Denny's Bacon Factory, Goodbodys, the jute factory, the papermills, the chipboard factory, the CAP factory, Wellworthy's tool-making factory, Gouldings Plastics, Fismar and others. One of the few remaining long-established businesses in Waterford, the ACEC factory which makes electrical components and equipment, particularly transformers has run into a very rough patch and redundancies are threatened. Thirty workers have been told they would be put under notice from tomorrow, 30 April.

In 1978 this company employed 300 people and at present they employ 210. The work force will not be very pleased if there is any further move to increase the number of redundancies. I am asking the Government to bring pressure on the concerns involved to ensure that the employment content is not reduced further. There are two major industries involved, the ESB, a State-sponsored body, and the parent ACEC company based in Belgium. It is a sad commentary when we see that this factory's problems arise because of non-investment in up-to-date equipment by the parent company, and as a result, that factory is not in a competitive position. I am asking the Minister to put pressure on the parent company to up-date the factory and to see that the most modern equipment is installed so that they can be competitive.

In fairness it must be admitted that a few years ago the parent company set up a new section to manufacture equipment for lighting effects. That section has been so successful that they can barely keep up with orders. The major labour content in the factory is involved in the manufacture of large transformers but that section has been run down to the point where the factory is now non-competitive.

The other concern involved is the ESB. We must face the fact that the ESB must buy equipment on the best terms but home industries must be very seriously considered. If the Government put pressure on the ESB to accept home produced equipment these threatened redundancies need not take place. It would be much cheaper for the ESB to pay slightly higher prices for their equipment than for the Government to hand out huge sums of money by way of redundancy, unemployment and pay-related benefits. I ask the Minister to investigate this.

This is the only factory in Ireland which manufactures large transformers. At the same time the ESB stores contain transformers, 80 per cent of which are of foreign origin. Those transformers are the life blood of the factory in Waterford and that factory is having difficulties at present. It need not be in serious trouble if decisive action is taken in time.

A new power station is being erected at Moneypoint. County Clare. I am told by the ACEC workforce that every transformer for that power station has been imported. I am told also that 75 per cent of the transformers for the ESB power plant at Tarbert, County Kerry, have been imported. The greatest irony of all is that in Butlerstown, a few miles outside Waterford city, the ESB in recent months installed a 31.5 MVA transformer costing about £100,000. That transformer was imported, although the same type of transformer can be manufactured at the ACEC plant in Waterford city and would give up to two months employment. One can imagine the annoyance and frustration felt by the work force in that factory when they see the ESB importing a product thay can produce but which they do not supply largely due to the fact that their equipment is not modern and up-to-date and therefore they cannot be competitive.

It is a two-fold problem: poor equipment and a lack of resolve on the part of a semi-State body to endeavour to help home industry which is having difficulties. It is obvious that the ACEC factory and the directors must invest in the transformer division as a matter of urgency. It is also imperative that the ESB should meet the ACEC management and work out a new contract under which ACEC will be given long-term commitments for the supply of transformers. That is the short-term and the long-term solution to the problem. The Government must halt the import of transformers until such time as the jobs in ACEC are secured. That is another immediate short-term measure which we should take.

In essence those are the points of the case I want to make here today. The Minister was most helpful in his capacity as Minister for Transport and Minister for Posts and Telegraphs in the past. He has outstanding business acumen. I would ask him to take a personal interest in the problems of this industry which, as we all recognise, can easily be saved. I would like the Minister to give a commitment to take that interest and to see that the jobs of 210 people in Waterford are saved. We cannot afford any further closures or redundancies in that city. As I said at the outset, it is the unemployment black spot in the whole of Ireland.

This is one of the many problems appearing on the horizon because of the deep recession we are in. We are trying to fight our way out of the recession. I will do my best to alleviate the problem as far as possible. I should like to put on record the situation in ACEC from the information available to me.

ACEC Ireland Ltd. are a wholly owned subsidiary of ACEC, Belgium, which in turn are 49 per cent owned by the Westinghouse Electrical Group. Westinghouse have a number of other factories in this country. ACEC Ireland Ltd. were established here in 1951 to manufacture small transformers for the ESB rural electrification scheme and, since that time, the company have experienced steady growth to the extent that they now operate three separate divisions: transformer manufacture and fluorescent lighting in Waterford, and engineering and switchgear manufacture in Dublin. The company employs about 280 workers of which 230 are employed in Waterford and 118 in the transformer division.

On 1 April the company notified the IDA and the Department of Labour that they intended to make about 25 workers redundant over the next few months due to a general decline in business. These redundancies would be spread over the whole organisation. During the previous recession the company were also forced to shed workers but, when the recession passed, they immediately began to expand and diversified into fluorescent light manufacture and switchgear manufacture. In their recent discussions with the IDA the company indicated that they were examining the possibility of moving into a higher technology area and they were also pressing the parent company in Belgium to transfer certain manufacturing processes to this country.

The workers have been alleging that ACEC have failed, down through the years, to modernise their plant and that this is the reason why their transformers are no longer competitive. To me this allegation seems to be without foundation. In December 1979 the IDA approved a grant towards capital expenditure of almost £1.5 million for the expansion and modernisation of the transformer division in Waterford. In June 1979 a grant for the expansion and modernisation of the lighting division was approved. Prior to 1979 the company had been approved IDA grants for various re-equipment projects estimated to cost in excess of £270,000. The company also availed of various R & D grants. In the past month the company put proposals to the IDA for the computerisation of the production processes at the factory. It is expected that implementation of these proposals will result in increased competitiveness and thus help to safeguard employment in the factory.

I am satisfied that ACEC are acting in a most responsible manner in trying to overcome their present difficulties, difficulties which are common to many managements throughout thhe country, where the classic situation arises of a drop in sales and a contraction in the market and, at the same time rising costs. The question is what action they should take for the long-term well-being of the company. The small reduction in staff at this stage will probably ensure continued employment for the remaining work force and the long-term liability of this project in Waterford. Since their establishment here the company have shown that they have the capability of overcoming adversity, and I have no doubt that they will continue to do so.

I listened with interest to what Deputy Deasy had to say about the ESB large transformers. Deputy Deasy and the work force can be assured that I will take up this matter personally with the ESB from tomorrow morning onwards. Whatever action can be taken within the capability of purchasing power should be taken. I have said this many times in the short time I have been Minister for Industry and Energy. I have taken a particular interest in the "Buy Irish" and "Sell Irish" campaigns. When I was in the Department of Posts and Telegraphs I initiated moves to show people in small and medium sized industries what products were needed, in what volume, and for what length of time. The exhibitions I held in various provincial towns resulted in £3 million worth of business being kept at home in less than one year.

I have had a message from Mr. Moriarty in relation to some of the points raised by Deputy Deasy. He says that what was in the papers yesterday was incorrect. The ESB are buying the vast bulk of distribution transformers in Ireland from ACEC and Unidare. ACEC have no complaints about the ESB purchasing policy in relation to their products. I got a note to that effect since the Deputy started to speak.

The Deputy asked me to take a personal interest in this matter and I certainly will. I will speak again to the chief executive of the ESB and try to find out what the facts are. The Deputy, the workers and the House may be assured that I will spare no effort. I realise that we are in difficult economic circumstances. Nobody will solve our problems for us. It is up to us to solve them. It is up to management to take the action they feel is right for the long-term solutions of their problems. It is up to the Government to take any decisions they can to help in these difficult circumstances. Problems are there to be solved. It is the essence of good management and of good Government to produce whatever solutions can be found. We cannot do it in isolation. We need a co-operative effort and I will be working along those lines in this ministry.

The Dáil adjourned at 5.20 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 4 May 1982.

Barr
Roinn