Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 7 Jul 1982

Vol. 337 No. 6

Adjournment Debate: Sandyford (Dublin) Industrial Estate.

I apologise for delaying the House. I raised this matter because I have made repeated efforts to establish the position of not just the Sandyford industrial estate but the installation of telephones in south Dublin generally. It gives me no great pleasure to detain the Minister but I made repeated efforts to elicit the necessary information. It requires a great deal of my time and the time of other Deputies to try to cut through bureaucracy. Naturally I do not lay particular blame on the Minister, but I feel strongly that the situation in Sandyford industrial estate has become critical.

These people invested £300,000, half of which is foreign investment, in a new plant which is to begin operation in the middle of this month. The plant is geared to distribution and export. Unless telephone and telex services are installed in these premises the investment will be lost and with it a great number of jobs. The company are likely to employ 20 people immediately, and as they expand the number of workers will increase. There has been enormous interest in this company and their operations not merely in Britain but in continental countries.

It is tragic that I have to come into this House to express the general frustration experienced by Deputies who are unable to establish the exact position of the installation of telephones, particularly for industrialists. My colleague, Deputy S. Brennan, raised this matter and received a reply which was not by any means satisfactory. I hope the Minister will consider this position because there are office blocks going up beside this factory offering prospective tenants telephones and a telex service immediately on occupation. This seems to be an enormous contradiction.

The telephone cabling appears to be into the factory and I understand from the engineering staff that their work will be done by the end of the month. However, there is no indication when the telephone service will be provided. This means these people will lose their investment and jobs for my constituents in Dún Laoghaire will also be lost.

I appreciate that it is very nice to have a choice of colour and type of telephone, but that does not compensate for the fact that people who have made investments here and have confidence in this country are unable to get a telephone service. Rather than quote chapter and verse of what has happened, I would like the Minister to give an undertaking to me, as a public representative, that a telephone service will be provided in time to avoid the loss of investment and jobs.

I do not want to detain the House. I fully appreciate that every Government have difficulty supplying telephones and I know the much-harassed Minister, Deputy Wilson, is under extreme pressure to provide phones in every corner of Ireland. I do not suppose he is short of listening to arguments as to the absolute necessity, vitality and urgency of supplying a telephone system here or there and at this stage there is probably no claim, demand or excuse the Minister has not heard over and over again. What we are doing is adding our voices to that on behalf of our constituents.

Dublin South is the fastest growing part of the country; it is the fastest growing suburban area in Europe, growing at an astronomical rate. Because of that growth rate it must have particular infrastructural attention and in that regard one must consider the telephone system. Our area is not just a dormitory area where people get into their cars and travel to distant parts for jobs and return at night. It is an area in which people work and where there are factories. We are fortunate to have a fine industrial estate on our doorstep and it would be a pity if we were not able to supply that estate with the infrastructural assistance it needs.

I ask the Minister to do what he can to ensure that the telephone system is improved in the Sandyford estate. I am aware that the whole telephone programme has come on in leaps and bounds in recent times. Much has been achieved but much remains to be done also. I am thankful that the industrial estates are still growing and providing employment and we should try to do our best to help in every way. At the end of the day the priority has to be to provide employment. If the infrastructure is not there and if this damages the prospect of employment it could have the effect of undoing the tremendous work of the IDA and the other agencies who are trying desperately to provide the much-needed jobs.

I add my voice to that of my constituency colleague in asking that this fast growing area should receive some special attention. This is not a party political issue in any way. It affects people in their everyday lives. I am conscious and appreciative of the work the Minister has done in this area but I ask him to have a special look at this estate to see if matters could be improved.

I regret that it has not been possible to provide service for firms in the Sandyford industrial estate when they need it. Clearly, I recognise the need of the industrialists and others there for telephone and telex service. Obviously it would be much more satisfactory from every point of view and much easier for me to be able to meet requirements as and when they arise than to have to explain why service cannot be provided but we are dealing here with facts and we must be realistic in facing them. I will outline these briefly in the time at my disposal and put the situation in Sandyford industrial estate in context.

The present unsatisfactory position of the telephone service stems from underinvestment in the service over many years to a point where, as the independent Posts and Telegraphs Review Group pointed out in 1979, it was in a state of crisis. The Government recognised that fact, accepted the importance of a high quality telecommunications service for the economic and social life of the country and embarked on a five-year telephone development programme. That programme, costing about £850 million at 1981 prices, is designed to bring the standard of service here up to the level in other countries in terms of availability and quality.

When the programme got under way in 1980, the waiting list for telephones was about 85,000. The highest rate of connections made in any year up to then was marginally over 40,000. Demand was over 60,000 a year. The STD failure rate on some of the main routes in the country was 40 per cent. These two statistics put the current position in context.

The time-scale for meeting the targets is five years. The Posts and Telegraphs Review Group saw this as a minimum period and recognised the difficulties there would be in meeting the programme targets in such a short time. It is interesting to note that what we were aiming at at the end of the five-year programme was to reach the standard that had obtained in other EEC countries when we started the programme.

The first requirement in improving the telephone service is to build up the infrastructure of the service itself in terms of buildings — some 500 of which were needed — replacing or extending all existing telephone exchanges, strengthening the various trunk routes throughout the country and developing the local cabling network. The recruitment and training of some thousands of staff are also involved. It is understandable, therefore, that it would take some time before the results of the substantial investment made in the telephone service become evident in the form of a much improved performance. The programme is broadly on target and I am confident that the objectives of a high quality service, with applications being met promptly by the end of 1984, will be achieved. If I say that the waiting list at present is a little over 80,000 and that we would hope to instal at least 80,000 telephones this year, it may put conveniently in perspective the progress made.

I might add that without seeking to score any political points, and the Deputy mentioned he was not making a political point, the position in Dublin both in regard to repairs and to installation of new phones would be better than it were if not for an embargo placed by the Government in July 1981 on the recruitment of staff, preventing badly needed staff for cabling and jointing work from being recruited. While that embargo was subsequently lifted and the men are being recruited and trained, valuable time has been lost.

I have thought it desirable to spell out at some length the background to the current position in regard to the installation of telephones in the hope that there will be a somewhat better appreciation of the problems involved.

Turning to the position now in the Sandyford and Stillorgan industrial estates, these are major ongoing developments. To provide for the general development in the area, a new telephone exchange building is being erected on Kilgobbin Road. This building will house a modern telephone exchange which will have the capacity to handle up to 20,000 lines eventually. Pending that exchange being brought into service, telephone service in the area is being provided by a number of mobile automatic exchanges which are currently serving over 1,000 working lines and have capacity to serve a further 2,000. Underground cabling is being laid and brought into service as quickly as possible. A new 2,000 line main underground cable to the industrial estate has recently been laid and work is currently in progress in laying distribution feeder cables to individual buildings. These are the essential preliminary works to enable telephone service to be provided.

Altogether there are at present applications for some 1,000 lines awaiting attention in the general area, at least 400 of which are for lines in the industrial estates. These applications will be met as quickly as practicable with the available manpower resources and subject to the constraints of the various site development works in progress in the industrial estates by builders. I would hope that provision of service will not be unduly delayed for Sun Freeze and others and everything possible will be done to meet the applications as quickly as possible.

Finally, might I say that throughout the country there are pressing needs on the part of industrialists and business firms generally for new and additional telephone, telex and data lines, conversion of manual exchanges to automatic working, provision of improved STD services and for better maintenance of existing services. Deputies will be well aware of the constant volume of representations being received every day from every corner of the country. Clearly it is essential that we should press ahead with developments throughout the country with the maximum possible speed involving a major commitment of finance, manpower and other resources. This is being done to the maximum extent practicable but I must emphasise that it is not expected to be possible to eliminate the waiting list generally, including that in Dublin, until the end of 1984. There is a clear limit to the amount that can be achieved in the short term and, regrettably, many companies and individuals will continue to experience some difficulties and delays meantime but on a gradually diminished scale.

The Dáil adjourned at 10.15 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 8 July 1982.

Barr
Roinn