I intend to take Questions Nos. 234 to 239 together.
By virtue of section 7 (3) of the Local Government (Planning and Development) Act, 1982, and section 23 (1) of the Local Government (Planning and Development) Act, 1983, I am precluded from exercising any power or control in relation to any particular case with which a planning authority or An Bord Pleanála is or may be concerned. Accordingly, neither myself nor my Department made any representations to members or officials of the planning authority or An Bord Pleanála.
In view of the afore-mentioned legal provisions, it would be inappropriate for me to comment on the board's decision in the case and, in any event, I understand that the matter is sub judice.
It is a matter for the board, in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Acts, to take all necessary steps to discharge their statutory duties and functions under the Acts, including where the board consider it appropriate, the employment of consultants, experts or advisers in individual cases.
The primary function of the board is to determine planning appeals and in so doing, to take all relevant factors into consideration. As the decision-making body, it is a matter for the board to determine to what extent the inspector's report is adopted, whether wholly, in part, modified by conditions etc., in reaching their decision on an appeal. Since the inspector's report is only a part of the decision-making process, it is not the practice that such reports be made available to the public.
In all cases An Bord Pleanála must include the reasons for their decision, including the reasons for any conditions attached to an appeal.