Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 6 Feb 1990

Vol. 395 No. 3

Order of Business.

It is proposed to take No. 9. It is also proposed that business shall be interrupted today and tomorrow at 10 p.m.

By agreement and notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders or in the Order of the Dáil of 7 November 1989, in relation to Private Members' Business, it is further proposed that:

(a) Private Members' Business which shall be Motion No. 50 shall be taken between 6 p.m. and 10 p.m. today and tomorrow and the proceedings thereon shall be brought to a conclusion at 10 p.m. tomorrow; and

(b) the moving of the motion shall not form part of the sequence set out in the Order of the Dáil of 7 November 1989.

Is the proposal for the late sittings today and tomorrow agreed? Agreed. Are the proposals for dealing with Private Members' motion No. 50 agreed? Agreed.

When can we expect the promised competition legislation to be introduced, in view of the urgency of such legislation in the face of recently announced and impending price increases, and the damaging effect these price increases are likely to have on the Programme for National Recovery?

I agree with the Deputy that it is important legislation. It is at an advanced stage. I will try to give the Deputy a more definite date for its introduction.

I am seeking information on two matters. First, I communicated with the Taoiseach yesterday in relation to the imminent release of Nelson Mandela from prison in South Africa and I suggested to the Taoiseach that we should perhaps invite him to address a joint sitting of both Houses.

Has the Taoiseach had time to consider this and could he respond today on that matter? Second, will time be provided, perhaps next week, for the debate on the Legal Aid Board and the resignations therefrom, which he suggested might be possible last week?

I am not sure if these are matters properly associated with the Order of Business. I will, however, allow the Taoiseach to reply, if he so desires.

I have not yet considered the Deputy's first suggestion. On the second question, my understanding was that the question of the debate on the Legal Aid Board was decided by the Dáil when the matter was put to a vote last week.

(Limerick East): Arising from the reply on competition legislation which the Taoiseach gave to Deputy Bruton, I would like to ask the Taoiseach if he stands over the consumer price index estimate announced during the week in the budget seeing that the price of beer is being increased by 2.5p, the price of a glass of spirits is being increased by 3p and the price of petrol is going up by almost 6p a gallon? These measures effectively cancel out the reduction in the standard rate of VAT announced.

These are matters that can be adverted to in the budget debate proper. They do not necessarily arise now.

(Limerick East): As we go into the budget debate proper, it is important that we should have an accurate estimate of the consumer price index.

We cannot debate the matter now.

(Limerick East): The reductions in the standard rate of VAT have been cancelled out by the brewers and the distillers and the petrol people. Could we have clarification on that before this very important debate commences after the Order of Business?

Deputy Proinsias De Rossa was offering.

I strongly support Deputy Spring's proposal to invite Mr. Mandela to address both Houses of the Oireachtas. This House passed a motion last year calling for his release and supporting the struggle of the people of South Africa for a democratic society. I urge the Taoiseach to take that on board.

In view of the Taoiseach's comments yesterday following his meeting with President Mitterrand with regard to German unity and the possibility of a neutral Germany, does the Taoiseach intend to provide this House with an opportunity to debate these issues and to debate the policy——

The Deputy should put down a question on this matter.

I think it is in order to ask that question on the Order of Business.

The Deputy can raise that at another time and in another way.

I understand it is in order, a Cheann Comhairle.

It is clearly not in order now.

I want to ask the Taoiseach to provide time for a debate on the issue of foreign policy.

The Deputy should put down a question. This is not Question Time.

Could I ask then in relation to that, if the Taoiseach would consider urgently the establishment of a foreign affairs committee?

These are all separate matters quite unrelated to the Order of Business.

The question of a foreign affairs committee is related to the Order of Business.

Please, Deputy De Rossa, do not persist. The Deputy knows full well that is not in order now.

I am asking the Taoiseach whether he intends to introduce a committee to discuss foreign policy in this House. It is a matter which has been referred to and promised on numerous occasions by the Government.

The Deputy should raise that matter in a more formal manner.

It has been allowed on numerous occasions on the Order of Business. I am simply exercising my right. Does the Taoiseach intend to introduce at an early date a foreign affairs committee into this House so that we can discuss the policy options facing this country?

Deputy Spring is offering.

(Interruptions.)

Deputy De Rossa, I have given you a lot of latitude.

You could give the Taoiseach some latitude and let him answer a legitimate question.

As the Deputy knows, patience does wear out.

It is a legitimate question.

In regard to my request for a debate on the resignations from the Legal Aid Board last week, I accept that my request was defeated by a democratic vote of this House. At that time the Taoiseach indicated he would be quite prepared to facilitate me next week. Because of the business of the House this week it is obviously not possible, so I am asking the Taoiseach if he could give a positive indication in relation to that debate if the Whips can agree it at their meeting this week?

The only thing I could point out about that is that the Deputy did not go to any lengths to facilitate me last week.

Are you looking for a pair?

(Interruptions.)

The Deputy is always entitled to trespass on my good nature.

In the absence of the Minister for Agriculture and Food, would the Taoiseach please tell the House why the file for the disadvantaged areas is still lying in Agriculture House? There is something wrong. I smell a rat.

(Interruptions.)

I would like to raise on the Adjournment the difficulty that has arisen with many local authorities following the tremendous storm and flood damage on all our roads throughout the country in the past four days, particularly in County Tipperary. There is no way we can deal with the crisis in view of the funding the Minister has allowed.

I will communicate with the Deputy in regard to his request to raise the matter on the Adjournment.

I wish to raise on the Adjournment the question of the acquisition of a site and the delay in the construction of Jobstown Community College.

I will be in touch with the Deputy concerning the matter.

When do the Government propose to introduce the legislation to give effect to the National Roads Authority?

It is still in the course of preparation. I am not sure of the latest position but I will let the Deputy know.

(Limerick East): I wish to raise on the Adjournment the recent increases in the price of beer, spirits and petrol.

I will be in touch with the Deputy concerning that matter.

The Chair will have noted how very orderly I was when I did not protest against the exclusion of my Private Notice Question about the storm damage in County Cork. Continuing in that line, I would like to be very orderly by asking to raise on the Adjournment the real need for emergency funding for the Cork County Council to repair that storm damage. I also want to raise the discrimination against County Cork in that funding was provided in the budget for two other areas and County Cork, as usual, was totally ignored.

I will communicate with the Deputy concerning the matter.

(Interruptions.)

Once again, I seek to raise on the Adjournment the question of continued funding for our 14 national youth information centres.

I will be in touch with the Deputy.

On the Order of Business, may I ask the Taoiseach, given recent media reports, when he is going to be in a position to announce the resolution of the rod licence dispute?

Please, Deputy. Deputy Currie has been offering.

The Taoiseach was about to respond.

Deputy Currie has been called.

A Deputy

The opening day of the trout season is on 15 February.

As a celebration of the Green Presidency and as an earnest of the Government's commitment to it, would the Taoiseach put some pressure on the Minister for the Environment to sign, two years and five months after it was introduced, the special amenity area order for the Liffey Valley?

I would like to raise on the Adjournment the massive coastal damage in the Sligo area caused by successive storms. I am looking for equal treatment with the east.

I will be in touch with Deputy Nealon concerning that matter.

I would like to raise on the adjournment the widely reported breach of the Programme for National Recovery contained in the proposal to sell off the Great Southern Hotels group to the private sector.

I will communicate with the Deputy.

I wish to raise on the Adjournment the plight of 30,000 householders in the Crumlin, Drimnagh and Bluebell areas of Dublin who are to be deprived of conversion grants following the decision to ban the sale and distribution of coal. This raises the question of the status of smoke control zones in the city.

I will communicate with the Deputy.

Can the Taoiseach tell us when legislation will be introduced to legalise the activities of the regional technical colleges in co-operation with industry? This legislation was promised for each of the last two sessions of the Dáil.

I will have to ascertain the latest position on that and let the Deputy know.

Is the Taoiseach aware that the regional technical colleges are currently acting in defiance of the law in activities they are conducting? Furthermore, is the Taoiseach aware that the Minister for Education, Deputy O'Rourke, promised this legislation would be taken "next session" during the last two sessions? Perhaps the Taoiseach would interest himself in this matter to ensure that there is some degree of expedition in it.

At least she is consistent.

Can we take it that she will seek consistently to postpone this matter?

She consistently neglects her duty.

I wish to raise on the Adjournment the accommodation problem at Fingal Community College in Swords.

I will be in touch with the Deputy concerning that matter.

I seek leave to raise on the Adjournment the failure to provide adequate halting sites for travellers in the greater Dublin area resulting in many travellers having to lodge on the side of the road at places such as Newlands Cross, Clondalkin and other locations.

I will communicate with the Deputy.

Wishing to be totally orderly, may I ask the Taoiseach, in view of the fact that the fishing season is about to open, to tell us when he will be in a position to bring legislation before the House, which has been promised, to amend the 1937 Fisheries Act?

Deputies

It was never promised.

It was promised.

I have already ruled on that matter, Deputy.

May I ask the Taoiseach, in the absence of the Minister for Agriculture and Food to outline what the position will be for Cavan farmers vis-à-vis the proposals to extend severely handicapped areas? This is an important question. Could I get the Taoiseach's attention?

Does the Deputy wish to raise it on the Adjournment?

Can the Taoiseach reply to my query now?

It is not in order now.

May I raise it——

The Ceann Comhairle will communicate with the Deputy.

Barr
Roinn