Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 15 Feb 1990

Vol. 395 No. 8

Financial Resolutions, 1990. - Financial Resolution No. 9: General (Resumed).

Debate resumed on the following motion:
That it is expedient to amend the law relating to customs and inland revenue (including excise) and to make further provision in connection with finance.
—(The Taoiseach.)

The doom and gloom which prevailed in the country has been replaced by an air of confidence and expectation. The Opposition parties tried on many occasions to claim credit for the successful policies of the Government, accusing them of stealing their clothes. They cannot accuse us of doing the same with their face, and that appears to have gone missing over the last few weeks. Despite the enormous cuts and resultant gains many of the Opposition Deputies are advocating that we throw it all away for empty policies which were given very little thought — a policy of spend and God will send. We might still be a Catholic country, but our beliefs do not extend that far.

One must ask what the priorities were in this budget. They were (1) to keep the public finances under control; (2) to spread the tax net more evenly; (3) to reform our tax system to encourage initiative and to reward effort; (4) to provide the climate for employment and (5) to assist those who are most in need. I believe that this budget goes a long way towards solving those problems.

I will now deal with specific matters in the budget, the first being social welfare. The 5 per cent increase is well in excess of the expected rate of inflation and will more than compensate for unexpected shortfalls last year. This is the third successive year that those unfortunate enough to be on long-term unemployment assistance will have it increased by 11 per cent. Social welfare recipients are morally entitled to these increases as we must realise that they are not in a position to benefit from wage increases or the reduction in tax rates. The new and higher welfare payments are in line with concerns raised by groups who lobbied for better social services.

The new welfare payment of £45 per week for people who care full-time for dependent elderly relatives will replace the £28 per week prescribed relative's allowance which proved to be very restrictive and indeed fewer than 5 per cent of the country's carers qualified for it. This new allowance is a major step forward and it recognises the wonderful work done by these unsung heroes.

A number of other social measures were announced which will be very beneficial. They include the clothing allowance which will come into operation next September and will be very welcome in many poor homes as buying clothing for children on their return to school after the long summer holidays has proved to be financially and embarrassingly difficult for parents. I am sure that this allowance will ease those difficulties.

The extra £10 million provided for health, including £5 million for services for the elderly, £3 million for dental services and £2 million for the mentally handicapped, will be very welcome in areas which did not receive the attention they deserved.

Generally, weekly welfare payments will be increased from next July. Why must people wait so long for the increase? This policy was introduced some years ago and successive Governments have continued it. I demand that it is changed so that recipients will get their increase in April.

The problem of local authority housing is very serious in County Kildare. It appeared as if we were taking a whole fresh look at the question of housing when the Minister for the Environment introduced the very helpful purchase scheme which enabled tenants to buy their local authority houses at roughly half their market value. Thousands of people throughout the country availed of the opportunity to do this and it also relieved the county councils of maintaining and repairing those houses.

While I compliment the Minister for instigating this scheme I question our future policy on building local authority houses. Last year in Kildare building slowed to a trickle and has now almost dried up. We were asked to carry out a survey of our housing needs and to present our case based on inspected, verified needs. We finally came up with 450 deserving applicants in need of housing. Unfortunately, this fact does not appear to have been accepted by the Department of the Environment because our allocation — to date — for 1990 is 40 houses. We cannot wait for ten years to deal with our housing problem as many of the pupils who are at present in school will be on our housing lists by then.

I suggest that we draw up a three year housing programme which would mean building 150 houses per year to meet this target. Such a programme would have a very beneficial effect on the economy and would give those who were forced to emigrate a chance to return home to a job. We have the applicants and the land and I appeal to the Minister to provide the money. If this matter is not tackled a serious problem will become a crisis. My advice is for a stitch in time.

I must mention the county roads in Kildare. Most Members and passing traffic only experience our arterial and main roads. As a result they think that the Naas by-pass is indicative of all Kildare roads. Nothing could be further from the truth; the county roads in Kildare are, without doubt, the worst in Ireland. It is not a record of which we in Kildare are proud and if there are any doubting Thomases or unbelieving Pádraigs who do not accept my assertion, I will be delighted to take them on a tour of our potholed-ridden county.

We carry more traffic on our roads than any other county. The reason is that any traffic leaving the capital and heading for the west must pass through Leixlip, Maynooth and Kilcock while all the traffic travelling south must pass through Newbridge, Kildare and Monasterevan. The Minister, to give him his due, acknowledged our problem and gave us an extra £1 million to spend this year but depite his generosity we will only be able to do a patch-up job. The task of restoring our roads to an acceptable standard must wait. We must all ask how long more they will have to wait.

One could travel to any part of Kildare; Allenwood, Ballymore Eustace or Ardclogh; and ask the people what their biggest problem is. I can guarantee that the replies will be the same, the dreadful state of our roads. School buses have stopped travelling on them, the county council refuse lorries took them off their schedule and fuel lorries have done the same. School children can no longer cycle on some of these roads. Last week the residents of the Ballymore area showed a video recording to Kildare County Council officials and left them in no doubt as to the state of our roads.

A few years ago there was a move to hold a number of Government meetings at Barrettstown Castle but they do not seem to take place there anymore. I think I know why. However, if it is decided to recommence these meetings let me offer a little warning: do not make mincemeat of our Mercs. Last year we were promised a special pothole machine but, unfortunately, it did not arrive and we are now considering hiring the very same machine. Last year's promise should be honoured this year which would allow us to spend the extra £1 million solely on materials.

It has often been suggested that we in Kildare are not getting value for money. It is easy to understand this when one compares the state of our roads with those in our neighbouring counties. I ask the Minister to send some of his experts to Kildare County Council to examine our work practices. After all, the Department of the Environment should be as keen as anyone to see that we are getting value for money. My own feeling is that we are spending far too much on administration and not enough on materials. There is no doubt that we could make savings in a number of areas. However, the real problem lies in the whole system of local authority funding. In 1977 we removed domestic rates and car tax and as a result deprived local authorities of a personal source of funding. The idea was to replace rates with an allocation from central funds. The public reacted quite favourably to this plan as it meant paying less tax but it was not very long until their eyes were opened. Car tax was quickly reintroduced and it became obvious that local authorities could not provide the required services. We need to restore power to local authorities so that they can raise their own finances to provide adequate services throughout the country. This is an area about which we — and indeed other parties — have done quite an amount of talking and made many promises. We must be honest and admit that we have failed to deliver. The sooner we bite this bullet the better.

Water, refuse and sewerage charges are no substitute and have proved to be a desperate embarrassment, particularly in areas like north Kildare. People in Leixlip are being asked to pay these charges while those living a mile down the road in County Dublin do not have to pay any. Is there justice in that form of taxation? Kites were flown about a property tax and, of course, there were objections, which is to be expected. We would be foolish to expect a general acceptance for any new type of local authority funding. Nevertheless we must realise that the patient is very sick and the sooner the medicine is administered the better. To knock on doors seeking votes for the local elections in 1990 — or any subsequent year — without solving this problem is tantamount to venturing into the polar bears' pit in the Zoo.

It is only right that in the course of my speech I should refer to the Defence Forces. The question of pay and allied matters were thorny issues in recent years but I am confident that the problems can be solved in the not too distant future. I was pleased to learn of the decision of the Department to enlist 1,000 new recruits this year. What I found more gratifying was that 6,920 people applied for those posts. Some may argue that that was a sign of the terrible unemployment that is with us at present but I look on it as an indication of the attraction of Army life for young people.

It is good to see that at long last old archaic Army barracks in Dublin, dating back to the dashing days of the Empire and inherited by this infant State, are being sold off and a realistic and modern approach is being taken to Army accommodation. The Curragh is the place for a modern barracks and Army headquarters. There is no doubt that it is not possible to find a more suitable location. The Kildare artillery barracks is close by, Baldonnel is but 20 miles away and the Glen of Imaal is accessible. The facilities at the Army Equitation School are excellent. The Military College provides scope for all types of training and, indeed, the Curragh has the physical room and an unparralleled tradition in the military field.

The Army Apprentice School in Naas trains technicians and has proved more than capable of answering all calls in emergencies. It is a long time since the people of Kildare suggested this new approach for our Defence Forces. Indeed, I am delighted to see that action is being taken in regard to the Army. I should like to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the Army for their service to our country and their willingness to answer any call and come up trumps every time. They provide armed military escorts for the movement of money and prisoners. In those operations not as much as one penny or one prisoner has been lost. There must be a lesson to be learned there in regard to armed escorts and using armed men as a deterrent for robbers and wrongdoers. We can see that the Army have played a major role in combating the number of robberies. Their record speaks for itself and I hope they will continue to provide the same type of service for many years to come.

There are a number of measures in the budget which will prove very beneficial to the agricultural industry. The changes in the rate of income tax and VAT will be welcome in farm households, particularly those on the lower end of the scale. The VAT refund for farmers is to be increased from 2 per cent to 2.3 per cent and, again, I am sure the farming community will be pleased with that development and also the changes in capital acquisitions tax.

The big change in regard to the latter is that in future the thresholds which determine the value of capital which can be transferred before the payment of capital acquisitions tax will be adjusted each year to take account of inflation. Another change in capital taxation will mean that in future gifts between spouses will be exempt from capital acquisitions tax and transfers of property from one spouse to another will be exempt from stamp duty where such transfers have the effect of creating a joint tenancy in the names of both spouses. The combined effect of these changes in capital taxation rules will be that many of the well run and well capitalised farms throughout the country can be passed within the family from one generation to another without creating a major burden on the inheritor.

I was delighted to learn that the Minister for Finance has recognised the importance of providing adequate training for those entering agriculture. In total an extra £1.7 million has been allocated to students in our agricultural colleges. That measure will have the effect of reducing the inequity between students in different sectors of vocational training. It will also encourage many farming families, particularly those on low incomes, to put their sons and daughters into agricultural training. In 1988, 70 per cent of the vacancies for farm managers notified to the Farm Apprenticeship Board remained unfilled for want of suitably qualified managers. The allocation of £1.7 million will ensure that in future years when such vacancies arise we will have a number of highly qualified managers. The emphasis on agricultural training can only be good for the industry and will in time result in additional output on the farms.

The beef industry has traditionally been our greatest money spinner. However, the last few years have proved to be difficult ones for that sector. Last year in particular was a disaster for many farmers. Cattle prices slumped last autumn and this meant that many farmers were selling cattle for the same price for which they had bought them. When we entered the EC farmers were promised a bonanza. They now had easy access to the huge European market. The first few years of our membership proved to be very rewarding ones for agriculture. Unfortunately, the last few years have seen the beef industry go into decline. Ten years ago we had three meat factories in Kildare, in Leixlip, Kildare and Sallins, and they killed one-third of the cattle killed in the country. Today Leixlip has closed, Kildare Chilling are on a one day week and the factory at Sallins is on a three day week. The meat industry provided many jobs in Kildare down the years. Unfortunately, the picture has changed much to the detriment of the workers. Their morale is at an all time low and who can blame them.

Continuity of work is no longer guaranteed and, as the summer draws near, many of those workers are facing a long hot spell on the dole once again. They deserve better. I should like to appeal to the Minister for Agriculture and Food to sit down with the other interested parties and prepare a plan which will guarantee a continuity of jobs in the meat industry. Since Polaroid moved out of the plant in Newbridge the IDA have spent a lot of time trying to find a replacement industry. Two years ago a German firm, Greenfields, announced their intention to set up in Newbridge. They have more than 1,400 outlets and they planned to export prepacked meats. That news gave a tremendous lift to the people of Newbridge but their plans seem to have run into difficulties. I hope that setback proves temporary and that Greenfields will set up in Newbridge and provide badly needed jobs for the area.

The decision of the Minister to grant £3.5 million to the horse racing and greyhound racing industries is welcome. Horse racing has for many years been described as the sport of kings. If that industry were to continue on the same road it has been travelling for years, it would be a sport of the past. The bloodstock industry is a major natural resource and represents approximately 8 per cent of our gross domestic product. It has enjoyed tremendous success for many years and is recognised worldwide for the quality of production. The industry provides employment for approximately 25,000 people. It has provided employment for many Irishmen and women down the years regardless of how the economy was performing. It is important to add that the jobs were provided without any assistance from the State. Unlike most countries, Irish racing never received a share of off-course betting tax and as a result the future of the bloodstock industry was placed in jeopardy. However, the grant of £3.5 million to racing will put the industry back on a sound footing. It will secure the jobs of those already employed in the sector and I am sure it will create many more jobs.

When Opposition Deputies looked around in vain for something to criticise on the evening of the budget some of them picked on the grant to the racing industries and said that the Minister thought more of horses and dogs than he did of sick people. They tried to give the impression that the Minister was giving the money directly to horses and dogs, like a person bequeathing money in a will to a dogs and cats home. I regard that as the cynical reaction of a very sick mind. The grant is going to help two important industries in need of help. They are very big employers in my constituency, particularly at the Curragh, the headquarters of Irish racing. The Minister has not revealed how he intends to distribute the grant between the Racing Board and Bord na gCon. It is fair to assume that horse racing will receive the lion's share and, as the grant is to continue for the next three years at least, both industries will have an opportunity to plan for the future. They should adopt a new professional approach aimed at providing a high quality service for customers. They have an opportunity for real growth and increased international prestige for the nation through a combination of self-help and astute application of funds.

A healthy racing industry is vital for the well being of the entire bloodstock industry. The racetrack is the shop window for all breeders and through lack of assistance from Governments, and indeed lack of imagination and initiative on behalf of the management, many of these racetracks have found themselves in serious financial difficulties while others are desperately in need of major improvements. A recent survey which was carried out reveals that over £16 million is urgently needed to put Irish racetracks back on a sound financial footing.

A sum of £10.4 million is required to refurbish racetrack buildings and enclosures and £2.2 million is required to bring the courses themselves up to a satisfactory standard. Outstanding debt owed by racetracks to the racing authorities totals nearly £4 million.

However, it is vital that part of this grant is spent on increasing the value of the smaller races. At present the value of these races is less than £1,200 while the value of a similar race in Britain is more than double. With training expenses running at approximately £600 a month, it is very easy to see why so many owners are getting out of Irish racing.

An increase in prizemoney at the lower end of the scale will help solve this problem. It would also attract many of those owners who have horses in British stables to bring them back to Ireland. An incentive must be provided for Irish owners. I think the time has come for the whole situation of the running of the racing industry to be looked at. The Turf Club and the Racing Board are both responsible for this and I ask, is it not time to have one racing authority?

The Racing Board and the Turf Club have continually ignored the needs of the betting shop punter. Now that you are receiving a grant from the off-course betting tax, it is time that you provide a professional service. There is not the same sort of interest by the off-course punter in Irish racing as there is in English racing. Admittedly, there is not the same continuity in Irish racing as there is in the English. But the question which I ask is why are so many of our summer meetings held in the evening times when the punter is prohibited from having a bet. When two meetings clash on the same day, more often than not the races are run at the same time, again not the most satisfactory position.

I would like to bring to the notice of the House the fact that the Irish Turf Club charge the Racing Post for publishing a list of runners at our meetings. One could hardly call it “good public relations”. Is it not typical of the attitude of the Turf Club, instead of being grateful for this major form of free advertising, they have to charge for it. Is it any wonder that Irish racing is in its present state?

I would ask that moneys be made available for the building programme to extend the centre at RACE. This new centre will not be just for apprentice jockeys but will benefit the many thousands of people working in the industry throughout Kildare. It will become a national equine education and training centre for the horse industry and not only for personnel in Ireland. It is hoped to train foreign staff there also.

To date 240 people have completed the course in RACE; of them 77 per cent are still working in the industry mostly in Ireland, while others have been very successful abroad. I feel a small investment here would ensure that 40 new trainees every year would attend RACE to gain skills, which would make them employable not just in Ireland but throughout the world.

I have some remarks to make on educational matters, and while they may be disjointed and unconnected, they are matters that I feel need attention. One is a matter of school buildings. I do not advocate a return of the same type of school all over Ireland, as happened years ago, but they had the merit of being built to last, and they are still standing after 100 years. They may not have been modern architectural marvels, but they still serve the primary purpose of providing shelter and keeping out the elements. In the last twenty years, some designers and architects really went overboard with flat roofs, roof lights and flashy new building systems. I know of two modern schools in Maynooth and Newbridge, built in the last 15 years, with dreadful roof leaks, that still defy permanent solution.

In Naas, the roof lights and coverings and associated rainwater outlets and coverings have now to be replaced after a lapse of 15 years and the total cost is well in excess of £40,000. I am told that these types of rooflights have a normal life span of ten years. I do not believe that the builder or architect would accept this type of design in his own house, if he had to pay the bill himself. The building unit or design team in the Office of Public Works or the Department of Education should not accept this either, when the unfortunate taxpayer is paying for it.

In general, I do not accept that we have to talk money in telephone numbers when the public are paying for the cost, and today, this seems to be accepted. Surely, any money spent in a thorough examination of such flawed designs would save us millions eventually.

I wish to deal briefly with the literacy problem. I am not going to lay the blame on TV watching, lack of parental control, lack of discipline in schools or a general decline in overall standards, but all teachers agree that today literacy is more a problem than ever and remedial action needs to be taken at primary level and followed through at post-primary level. I know of many schools where the remedial teachers are not allowed or are not able to carry out the particular duties for which they were trained, and pupils needing individual special attention, slip through the system and are branded as failures. We need not look askance at the figures for illiterate people in India or Mexico or Zaire or elsewhere. We need to apply the remedy at home first.

Surely, it would be money well spent to provide a helpful pupil-teacher ratio with special classes and special teachers at a time when the pupil can be helped than to be forced to spend it on reform schools and places of detention later on. This is not the advice of a crank, but I believe it is a fundamental flaw in our educational system as it operates at present. Even at a time of extreme unemployment, I know of one type of person who is assured of plenty of work, all over the country, that is the skilled tradesman. Most Members of the House will have experienced the difficulty in getting a good plumber or carpenter or electrician when you need one, and indeed they are getting scarcer.

It is in this context that I want to refer to apprenticeships and modern thinking in this regard. I will not venture into the debate as to where education ends and where training begins, or the overlapping that went on between the Department of Education and the Department of Labour in the early days of the expansion of AnCO and the thinking regarding training and apprentices in these years.

Obviously, the system since 1980 has not been a success. Huge numbers were taken in and proper training was impossible. The system of one year off-the-job training was not popular with employer or employee and simply did not work. I am prepared to say that the new FÁS probably will not succeed in producing a trained craftsman after two years or 25 months. It will not be possible to produce plumbers of carpenters after two years because even a person of exceptional skills needs time to grow up and mature and the four year period was a period of education as well as training. My advice is not to rush into this new FÁS system of apprentice training. Knowledgeable people in USA and Britain have spoken out against it and what failed there is unlikely to succeed here.

In conclusion, I welcome this budget in its overall approach in keeping a tight grip on the public finances and the spreading of the burden of taxation, which in turn, creates incentive and allows people to hold on to more of their income. I hope that the provision of new jobs will continue and that the caring of the elderly and the less well off will remain a major priority for this and all further Governments.

I ask that all benefits which accrue from our recent policies be given to those who need it most. As we enter a new decade it is easy to see this new wave of optimism in our country. The Government have taken corrective measures to create this climate, I say, let us keep it up.

I know the Chair has been somewhat lenient with Deputy Power and, indeed, a portion of his speech could well have come from this side of the House. I have listened with some interest to the contributions from various Members in this ritual of commenting on the speech of the Minister for Finance. Indeed, the contribution of the Minister for Finance, Deputy Reynolds, lasting two and a half hours was one of the longest in the history of budget presentations. It was a well put together speech. It covered all the aspects which the Government had considered in social and political detail for some months. It did not contain one syllable of the Irish language which may well be a record — I do not know — but it makes a mockery of one of the twin pillars of the foundation of the Fianna Fáil Party, who now actively support, as they did in the past, the promotion of all-Irish schools and matters related to the promotion of the language.

Most contributions have centred around jobs, emigration and poverty. It is fair to address the budget from those points of view because there have been various pieces of social welfare confetti thrown around. While they are welcome and important, they do not address the fundamental problems we face.

Where do we stand, having achieved the age of majority in terms of participation in the EC since we decided to join in 1972? What have we done with the billions of pounds that have crossed the Channel to Ireland? Why have we such serious unemployment, low morale, stress and anxiety in the workplace? Why is it that we will over the next ten years export 500,000 qualified graduates to practically every other country in the world? Why is it that we now have 240,000 people out of work and forced to present themselves on a weekly basis, in public humiliation, at social welfare exchanges that are completely inadequate to deal with personal matters? Where is the hope in the budget? Where is the motivation in it? Where is the inspiration to lift our people to do for themselves what is always an inherent Irish trait when one is forced to go abroad? One has only to look at the success stories of literally thousands of people forced to leave our shores in other countries. Why can we not provide that same motivation in our own land?

What answers has Deputy Reynolds given to the question of jobs, emigration and poverty in this budget? Are the Government really serious about the provision of a solution? Since 1973 there have been huge improvements generally in terms of facilities, water, sewerage, roads, communication, etc. consequent upon the various schemes coming from Brussels. However, there are still savage inequalities. While various pieces of legislation have been introduced they are of minimal impact and have never been followed up in terms of facilities to implement them adequately?

Other Deputies have referred to the taxation reductions and so on. I do not propose to deal with that except to say that those in the 48 per cent bracket have got no concessions. Their ESB charges will rise, as will their telephone charges, and service charges, if they live in an area where service charges apply, will more than likely go up as well.

We have come part of the way since 1973 but we still have a long way to go. Deputy Reynolds is obviously a very shrewd politician who has come a long way himself since his election to this House in 1977. I saw a picture recently in one of our national papers which depicted him pointing with a ministerial wave over the waters of the Shannon and probably speaking like a complete evangelist on everybody's problems, social, personal or otherwise. In one of his typically shrewd comments before presenting the budget he said that it was a budget with a human face. Is it a budget with a human face? Next January, when the effects of some portions of the budget take effect, will people remember that the Minister for Finance said that the Coalition of Fianna Fáil and the Progressive Democrats — the Progressive Democrats who wanted to join Fine Gael last year and have now joined Fianna Fáil — has finally presented the ultimate budget, one with a human face? One would think, listening to the comments of various Government members and to the confusion that exists about the billions of pounds now floating around this country, that we are being led to the promised land and that we will arrive there in 1992. Very intelligent people are absolutely confused by the Civil Service Government jargon in terms of Structural Funds and benefits from this scheme or the other. The amount of paperwork that has to be gone through in order to reach the core of many of these grants is unbelievable.

I took exception to the Government's decision to reduce overseas development aid. It was done in a peculiar way. The strategy of the budget with a human face seems to end at our coastline. There are a great number of young Irishmen and women, priests, sisters, brothers, lay missionaries and lay people in the medical world doing vast amounts of valuable work in Third World countries where huge populations are struggling to survive. To cut overseas developments aid is nothing short of scandalous. There was an article written by five parliamentarians recently commenting upon a booklet called The State of the World's Children in 1990. They said that up to 40,000 deaths occur each day in the Third World from hunger and that in the next ten years one hundred million children will die from treatable illnesses and malnutrition. These deaths will not occur as a result of floods and famines; they will not be covered by television, and the global population in the developed world will not be outraged by such enormous losses. The comment on the booklet's description, which is that “they will die in the sunken eyed coma of dehydration or in the gasping extremities of pneumonia or in the iron grip of tetanus or in the fever of measles or on the rack of whooping cough.” These deaths are needless and preventable at a very low cost. They go on to state that the solution in terms of treatable illnesses would cost £1.5 billion, which is what is spent in the Soviet Union on vodka each month, in the US on advertising cigarettes on a yearly basis and is 10 per cent of the EC's annual farming subsidy. The question has to be asked if the will is there when there is a way. If this is a budget with a human face? The implications are clear in the reduction of overseas development aid. As the parliamentarians conclude in their report: “The children are still dying to know if we have the will”.

I have mentioned the Structural Fund and the facilities that exist. Minister Reynolds says we can expect to get over £3 billion from the Structural Fund between 1989 and 1993. That is all very welcome. I would like to put on the record of this House that many local authorities prepare plans in terms of the Structural Fund. Many of those plans run into literally hundreds of millions of pounds. Every conceiveable item, from international stadia down to the cleaning of the local sewer pipes, are included in the programmes for structural funding. This is all channeled back through the Department of Finance, and Minister Reynolds and his people over there in their elevated offices can dole it out to the various categories as they see fit.

I listened to the Minister of State, Deputy Harney, here this morning and congratulate her on her first contribution on a budget as a Minister of State. I notice that her contribution was somewhat less passionate than it used to be when she spoke from a position of non-responsibility. I am not sure if a degree of tension exists within the Custom House or what budget is at the Minister's disposal to implement all the improvements she spoke about, but it would appear that every drain, waterway and other cause of pollution will be addressed over the next ten years in terms of the £300 million which the Minister for the Environment. Deputy Flynn, has promised to the nation. That is exactly half the amount spent during the past ten years in trying to redress this problem.

We have heard the hullabaloo in regard to the Tribulus, which got into difficulties off our coast. It is very important that we offer shelter to stricken ships, but it is also very important to ensure that there will be no pollution in our territorial waters consequent upon their arrival in our harbours. Some rumpus was raised about 500 gallons of oil. I do not believe any local authority on the west coast from Donegal to Cork have any decent facilities with which to deal with an oil spillage. Heaven help us if there is a repeat of the incident involving the Exxon Valdez or any other supertanker in the mid-Atlantic. If there was an oil spillage most of the beaches on the west coast would be wiped out for half a century because of the direction of the Gulf Stream and the power of the Atlantic. Most of these beaches have received blue flag awards from the EC. Both the Minister and Minister of State have spoken about spending millions of pounds over the next ten years in implementing anti-pollution measures, but no provision is being made for facilities to deal with such disasters. I am glad the Government were pressurised by all parties and the west coast search and rescue committee into providing a Dublin helicopter service on the west coast. I welcome the provision of this helicopter. While it does not meet all the requirements, it will be of assistance.

If we regard ourselves as politicians with a human face we should not forget the incident in February 1989 involving a supertanker with a Korean crew on board which got into difficulties in mid-Atlantic. When the Shannon air rescue service contacted the British authorities they in turn had to contact the US military authorities. The House will recall that two Jolly Green Giant helicopters from the military wing of the American Army left Knock Airport to lift the crew from that tanker. It has been brought to my attention that no formal thanks was extended to the American Government for the service they provided and that a bill was actually sent by this Government to the Americans for the cost of keeping the helipad centre open and the fuel used. That is not a very human face. There is a clear need for a general discussion, with no cards held under the table, on the dispute which has arisen, and will continue to arise, between industry and the environment. In the Government's environmental action programme recently launched by the Minister and his Minister of State, the Minister, commenting on the environmental impact assessment under the heading "Industry and the Environment", said it will have a particularly important role to play in clarifying the relationship between industry and the environment and in general in promoting a greater understanding and consensus on the location and control of new industry. At present 50 per cent of the land in the west has been leased under prospecting licences to various companies. Serious concern has been expressed by a great number of people, some of whom might be informed and some of whom are very well informed about these matters.

While Green politics are here to stay, there is a clear need for Government action in bringing about a balance between industry and the environment. There is a point where compatability can be reached and where industry can survive in environmental areas. Naturally, many people are worried about the consequences of the use of chemicals such as nouvam in fish farms and cyanide in goldmining, etc. While I welcome the fact that an environmental action programme exists, obviously there is a need for greater understanding, promotional work and clear dialogue between the various interests concerned.

There is also a controversy about the prospecting in Croagh Patrick and the Delphi area which will spoil the beauty of the areas. When one balances the industrial impact of developing natural resources with the potential which exists in the tourism area, naturally confusion results. I would like to think that the Government will continue to take action in a much stronger way. Understanding has to be reached between these two categories. If the Government propose to develop natural resources and tourism, a balance will have to be reached between both in terms of the economy and quality of life.

Obviously, there is a crisis in the cattle industry. Those involved in smaller farming activities have suffered severely over the past number of years because of a reduction in prices and delays in the payment of headage grants, ewe premiums, suckler grants and beef scheme grants. Even though the section of the Department dealing with these grants has been decentralised to County Cavan, which is a welcome move, it should not be beyond technology to operate a system whereby cheques can be cleared for payment from Davitt House in Castlebar, files sent to the Department of Agriculture and Food in Dublin, transferred to Cavan and sent back to Castlebar by Wells Fargo or whoever else. Thousands of small farmers who should have got their grants months ago have not got them. I know the Minister of State opposite has a keen interest in this matter and I am sure that when the Minister for Agriculture and Food — I wish him well in his recuperation — returns this matter will receive proper attention.

I understand that the Government passed legislation dealing with the use of hormones and growth promoters, in cattle, which is illegal. It is strange that many beef plants slaughter powerful animals, lean beef, of up to ten kilos deadweight with the category of U3, which is practically biologically impossible to achieve, without hormonal injection or the use of growth promoters. I wonder if there is any truth in the allegations made by those in farming circles that the largest importers of illegal hormones at present are subversive organisations and groups associated with them. If we have legislation banning growth promoters and hormones then it should be implemented. Obviously, the Government should implement the legislation and I should like the Department to investigate this matter.

I am glad that the social discord and economic disruption which has gone on for the past two years as a result of the the rod licence dispute is now over. I suppose one could say God help the fish when the armada of enthusiastic fishermen invades the lakes. I do not want to say anything against the legislation and I am glad this dispute is over. I hope that the share certificates necessary to enable the co-operative movement to develop properly will not become non-existent after a few years. I have said publicly that this legislation was rushed through the House. It did have the support of this party at that time following a statement made by the then Minister for the Marine, Deputy Daly, whom was made the sacrificial lamb by the Government. He stuck to his point of view and accepted the collective decision of the Cabinet, yet he was hung out to dry. I am glad that this dispute has been resolved and I hope that Bord Fáilte will now launch an onslaught to promote angling holidays and that those people, such as small hoteliers and those who provide bed and breakfast, who were squeezed between angling interests and the Government, will recover from this serious set-back.

I ask the Government to continue to take action on fish farm developments. I am aware from replies given to two questions I put down last year that it is Government policy not to allow any futher fish farming on any of the fresh water western lakes. I hope this policy is continued. I ask the Minister for the Environment and the Minister for the Marine to explain to people the consequences of fish farming for these areas and to take into account the balance I referred to previously to show that the Government have a human face, as the Minister for Finance claimed.

Charter flights into Knock Airport is a big issue. There have been rows about this matter in the west, even among politicians. Members of the Fianna Fáil Party, including the Cathaoirleach of the Seanad, decided to call a press conference to which they invited only their own supporters and reporters to explain their opposition. In reply to a question I put to the Minister for Tourism and Transport, Deputy Brennan, last week, he stated that charter flights from the United States could fly to Knock Airport directly but had to exit via Shannon. On a radio programme recently Mark Killilea, MEP, stated that the pilot of a charter flight from the United States made sure that no one disembarked at Shannon when he got out to check the tyres before flying to Knock. How ridiculous can one get? We should remember that there may be fewer than half a dozen charter flights in any 12 month period. They should be allowed to fly to Knock Airport directly. We are forever speaking about the need for competition and the benefits we may reap as a result; but here is a case where the Government, at a time when they are requesting the EC to level out all other playing fields, seek to maintain protection for an airport here. I would like this matter to be addressed also.

A report in last Sunday's edition of The Sunday Correspondent, a new British newspaper, stated the results of a survey carried out in Sheffield on unleaded petrol showed that the agent benzine had not been removed from unleaded petrol. A product in which this agent is to be found has been the source of a scare about drinking water in recent times. An investigation should be carried out by the Department to see whether or not it is to be found in unleaded petrol being sold here.

We have been told that this is a budget with a human face, yet we continue to spend millions of pounds on high technology in the health sector. We need to manage our resources more effectively. Present life expectancy is 71.3 years. Why then is a 65 year old person in need of a hip operation told that they will have to wait three years on a public waiting list before this operation can be carried out? The Government who claim to have a human face are forcing thousands of people to wait for half their remaining years before an essential operation can be carried out.

In the Western Health Board area no dental service is available for adults while only an emergency service is available for children. In addition, 3,500 children await orthodontic treatment. Why has the Minister for Health not notified the health boards of their allocation of the sum of £3 million announced by the Minister for Finance, Deputy Reynolds, two weeks ago? This matter should be tackled immediately. If it is the case that there is no waiting list in some areas then those areas in most difficulty should receive extra assistance. I was told in reply to a question I put yesterday that the Western Health Board are advertising both here and abroad for a temporary dental surgeon to be based in Belmullet where no dental service has been provided in recent months. The people living there are entitled to a dental service just like everybody else. That is another matter I would like to see addressed. While the sum of £3 million appeared to be adequate when allocated, it is too little, too late.

Local radio has been a big success. I ask the Minister for Communications to consider upgrading existing facilities for the broadcasting of television signals. The MMDS system will prove very expensive for thousands of people across the country and will not prove to be a better system than the present one, which is being operated well and economically. They are very happy with it.

I am grateful for the opportunity to make these few remarks. I am not quite sure what Deputy Power meant when he spoke about the polar bear's pit in the zoo. Perhaps he might get a call from an office on high to explain some of the remarks he made in his contribution and the polar bear's pit might be a very nice place indeed when compared to what might happen to him. I thank you, a Cheann Comhairle, for allowing me to say these few words and to refute the allegation that this budget has a human face — far from it.

It is hardly worth my while to commence my contribution now.

The Deputy at least is in possession.

In congratulating the Minister for Finance for the budget he presented I am merely reflecting the general opinion of the people. Not only was it a good budget, but it followed the good budget of 1989. There has been mature handling of the nation's financial affairs during the past three years with the result that the various provisions of the budget are looked at in a mature way by the vast majority of the people. The usual ritual complaints of the Opposition parties sound hollow when we look at the budget in its entirety. When it is looked at in its entirety we can see that it is a winner. It reflects the confidence which has been restored at all levels and which had begun to be rebuilt in 1987. The budget will lead to an increase in confidence.

In the build up to the removal of barriers in 1992 this budget is of prime importance. We need more of the same in coming years. During the past three years a mature electorate have accepted that we must take the long hard road to get the country back on its feet. Even attempts to grossly distort the picture have not panicked the electorate. The antics of the main Opposition party on the day before the budget were inedifying to the extreme and they won no support among the electorate.

Some commentators have said that the budget was too conservative and that a more daring approach is called for in present circumstances. The fact of the matter is that it has been a tough battle to get where we are and there is still a lot of ground to cover. Therefore, the only road the Minister can take is the one of solid steady progress. In the late seventies Fianna Fáil took the daring course following the receipt of the best economic advice. There was strong criticism when the upswing in the world economy did not take place as predicted and this daring programme of the Government misfired. Given our tough battle to face the challenge of 1992 it would be quite unwarranted to gamble with the economy.

Debate adjourned.
Barr
Roinn