Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 27 Mar 1990

Vol. 397 No. 5

Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Industrial Training Programme.

Tomás MacGiolla

Ceist:

23 Tomás Mac Giolla asked the Minister for Labour, in view of the findings of the major FÁS report, published in January 1989, that Irish firms will have to provide more training for employees if their companies are to survive and thrive after 1992, the steps he intends to take to improve the level of training in Irish firms; if these firms will be required to make a more significant financial contribution towards such training; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

The Government are very conscious of the need to ensure that Irish industry is properly equipped to meet the challenge which will be presented through the opening up of the EC Internal Market in 1992.

Continuing training for those at work is essential if workers are to be able to keep up with changes in skill requirements and other technologial developments. Employers and employees alike must become more aware of the importance of training.

The Government have, at my request, allocated £4 million approximately to FÁS in 1990 for an industrial restructuring training programme to be directed at those in employment.

The programme is designed to help industry prepare for 1992. In the context of the programme, FÁS plans to enable employees to avail themselves of training under a wide range of headings. While FÁS will part fund the training costs of firms availing themselves of the programme, firms will also have to bear significant costs, both in actual training expenses and more generally in respect of the wage costs of their employees. Government policy has always been, and continues to be, that the prime responsibility for employee training rests with firms and that, accordingly, they must bear the main costs.

As President of the Council of Social Affairs Ministers, it is my intention that a community action programme on continuing vocational training will be adopted at the Council meeting in May. The aim of the programme is to support and complement the policies and activities of the member states in the area of continuing vocational training and to involve all those concerned such as employers, employees and public authorities.

Would the Minister agree that notwithstanding what he has said that the thrust of the FÁS report is that we compare very poorly in this area with other member countries of the EC? Would he agree that this absence of suitable training facilities and lack of emphasis on the need for training is one of the serious impediments to competitiveness in the context of 1992 and, indeed, one of the greatest impediments to this economy becoming a highly paid economy with sustainable productive jobs? Would he be prepared to comment on the specific proposals made to him by the CII in this context?

Briefly, I should like to say that is why we have started an industrial restructuring training programme for employees apart from about £35 million from the Exchequer and about £60 million from European social funds that is already being spent on training. I hope that the FÁS will put several thousands workers through their training schemes. The present restructuring training programme is in conjunction with CII. The views of the CII and the FIE will be taken into account in our plans.

Can the Minister address the point concerning whether a greater contribution towards training is likely to be sought in the future from the private sector?

The reason we are out of line with some countries — not all countries — in the EC is that employers have tended to put far more money into training. Under the industrial restructuring training programme they will also be obliged to pay the people involved while they are on training and also to pay some of the costs towards maintaining training schemes. The Government have, for their part, allocated £4 million.

That disposes of questions for today.

Barr
Roinn