Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 28 Mar 1990

Vol. 397 No. 6

Adjournment Debate. - Border Checkpoint Incident.

On Tuesday, 27 March, at about 2.30 p.m. when making my way to Dáil Éireann, I stopped at the military checkpoint at Aughnacloy, which is customary. When I was temporarily parked there waiting to be called to the central position to identify myself and get clearance, a soldier walked out of the turret which is about 12 yards from the main building and from where the soldier observed approaching traffic. He trained a high velocity rifle at me to read — as I was told later — the number plate of my car with the telescopic sights on his rifle. It was a most frightening experience although I was almost 100 per cent certain that he did not intend to shoot me.

When I was called forward a few minutes later I asked the soldier in the central position to get the officer in charge because I wanted to make a formal protest. He asked me what my protest concerned and I told him that the soldier a few yards back had pointed a rifle at me and had caused me to experience great fear. The soldier explained that this was normal practice. I imagine he thought I was Brit-bashing but I immediately put the soldier at ease and identified myself as the Deputy who went across the Border to lay a wreath for eight young British soldiers — they were teenage boys rather than soldiers — who had been brutally murdered by IRA violence. My credentials were impeccable. A constable identified me and I than questioned the correctness of using telescopic sights to read the number plate of a car. They defended the practice and said that they did it all the time. I suggested that it had been a most frightening experience and that binoculars should be used instead. It is not an excuse to say that someone has to read a number plate from a distance of 12 yards.

What happened was wrong and that is why I am bringing it to the attention of the House. It is indefensible that any soldier should raise a rifle and point it in any direction. In the conversation I had with the military personnel I realised that this is normal practice and I immediately exonerated the soldier who pointed the rifle at me. I told him I had nothing personal against him but that I certainly had a strong objection to the principle and the practice of using telescopic sights as binoculars.

I know that the rifle was loaded and that soldiers have accidentally shot people. A friend of our family, Mary Doherty from Strabane, was accidentally shot when a bullet was discharged by a soldier cleaning his rifle. She was in the back seat of a car at the time. At the same check-point a young boy was shot dead by accident. It was a dreadful experience but I do not want this to go down as Brit-bashing because that is not my style in public life. I made inquiries of people in Belfast and all round the Border and it appears that it is a common thing for soldiers to train rifles at people. I am bringing it to the attention of the House, the Government and the Secretariat to ensure that the British authorities cease this practice.

The soldiers who man the posts along the Border are young boys who come there to be trained in urban guerilla warfare. The posts are being used by the British Government — as Northern Ireland is being used by them — to train soldiers. Most of them are there for a term of duty and then sent home. The young soldiers are inexperienced and I do not use this occasion to criticise them. They are doing the job they have been trained to do. I take grave exception to a soldier pointing a rifle at me and, as someone in public life, if I did not take a stand on this and publicly protest I would be failing in my duty.

For that reason, a Cheann Comhairle, I sought your advice on the matter. I spoke to the leader of the party and I concluded that the right thing in the circumstances was to discuss it on the Adjournment. I ask the Minister to bring it officially to the attention of the Government who, in turn, should bring it to the attention of the British Government so that soldiers operating in Northern Ireland will not use telescopic sights to identify people on the street, to read vehicle number plates at checkpoints or for any purpose whatever. If identification is the reason they look through the telescopic lens of their rifles then they should be supplied with binoculars. Rifles are for killing people and I am frightened of them. If there is a minute left, Deputy McGinley would like to use it.

I would like to support my colleague from Donegal, Deputy Harte, in what he has said. I have experience of coming through that post very often, almost on a weekly basis. While I did not have any experience such as Deputy Harte had yesterday morning, we are all aware of a number of serious and indeed fatal incidents that occurred at that place down through the years. It was only last year or the year before that a young man who was going through that checkpoint on his way to a football match on the Monaghan side of the Border was one of the fatalities of the troubles in that part of our country. We are told his death was accidental. I would certainly feel very uneasy and uncomfortable if I was looking down the barrel of a rifle with a telescopic lens. I support Deputy Harte in what he has said and I would ask the Minister to bring this to the attention of the authorities in the North and of the Secretariat to make sure that this practice will not continue.

I appreciate Deputy Harte bringing to the attention of the House his experience of Aughnacloy yesterday. Having a weapon pointed in one's direction is clearly a most disconcerting experience and I fully understand the anxiety which it has caused the Deputy. The reason he raised it here is perfectly understandable. The Government are obviously also deeply conscious that an innocent civilian was tragically killed at this same Border crossing some two years ago in circumstances which gave rise to deep and widespread disquiet.

The Government are very concerned at the practice by members of the British Army of, as Deputy Harte said, on occasion using the telescope on their rifles as, in effect, binoculars. Our concern on this matter has been expressed on a number of occasions to the British authorities in recent times. We believe it is inappropriate to use telescopic sights in the manner complained of by the Deputy because of the obvious concerns for safety that arises and also because the practice is one which most people would understandably find very intimidating.

If a member of a British Army patrol needs to be able to see at some distance, then the patrol should be issued with a set of binoculars for this purpose. It is unacceptable that people should have soldiers pointing lethal weapons at them in these circumstances.

On receiving the Deputy's report of this incident this afternoon, the matter was raised immediately in the Anglo-Irish Secretariat in Belfast and the Government's concern was conveyed in full terms to the British authorities. The British authorities have responded to our representations on this matter this evening and have told us that their standing instruction is that telescopic sights are to be used for surveillance purposes as an absolute minimum, and that when weapons are used in this manner, they should not be ready for action. We have made it clear that no matter how well intentioned such guidelines may be, they fail to adequately address the problem. We have also expressed the view that the use of telescopic sights at short range, as was experienced by Deputy Harte yesterday, is not easily reconciled with their use only as an absolute minimum.

The reality is that any reasonable person will naturally be very frightened when they see a soldier pointing a weapon at them and will rightly feel that they may be in a life-threatening situation. We have pressed the British authorities strongly on this point and have emphasised the possible potential for serious, if not fatal, accidents arising from this practice. Where unnecessary risks to the public are identified — and we believe that the use of telescopic sights for surveillance at Border crossings could be one such risk — it is vital that they be examined in a most critical way and steps taken to remove them. We have emphasised that we can see no reason why binoculars cannot be used in these circumstances and that such basic equipment should, if required, be available at Aughnacloy and other permanent Border posts.

I appreciate the Deputy bringing this matter to the attention of the House and I can assure him and Deputy McGinley that the views they have expressed here will be brought to the attention of the Minister for Foreign Affairs, and the matter pursued vigorously through the Anglo-Irish Secretariat in Belfast.

The Dáil adjourned at 12.25 a.m. on Thursday, 29 March 1990 until 10.30 a.m.

Barr
Roinn