Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 19 Jun 1991

Vol. 409 No. 10

Ashbourne (Meath) New School.

About 1,000 pupils leave Ashbourne, County Meath, each morning to go to school elsewhere, mainly in Dublin city. In 1982, the then Minister for Education, former Deputy John Boland, approved in principle the provision of a secondary school in Ashbourne. One of his successors, former Deputy Gemma Hussey, acquired a site for the school and planning commenced. While one must acknowledge that some progress has been made since 1987, when there was a change of Government, the rate has been very slow. It is important to recognise that early next year it will be ten years since a decision was made in principle that there should be a secondary school in Ashbourne but not one sod has yet been turned.

The up-to-date position is that the bills of quantities have been commissioned by the Department of Education from a private architect. Normally it takes six to eight weeks to complete these documents for a school but in this case, even though they were requested from the architect at the beginning of the year, they have not yet been provided. As a result it has not been possible for the Department of Education to advertise for tenders. There were some suspicions in Ashbourne that the architect had been asked to go slow in providing the bills of quantities while others suspected that the architect found he had more attractive work to do and simply put the request in the bottom drawer of his desk and did not do the work. The people of Ashbourne are not satisfied with the position that work which normally takes six to eight weeks to complete has not yet been completed.

This matter was raised with the Minister for Education in the Dáil on 13 June and, surprisingly, she said in reply that the planning of the proposed new community school in Ashbourne was "proceeding satisfactorily". I do not believe that any Member of the House would be satisfied that it is taking up to six months to prepare the bills of quantities. Indeed, the Ashbourne second level school committee were extremely disappointed that the Minister expressed herself as satisfied with the progress being made in response to questions put to her on 13 June by a number of Deputies, including myself.

The people of Ashbourne and I would like to know, before they make certain decisions on 27 June, whether the Minister is prepared to give a cast iron assurance that work will commence on the school this year, that the bills of quantities will be prepared within the next few weeks and that she will advertise for tenders before the end of July. We believe that this objective is entirely feasible. It is extremely important that work should commence during the summer so that the school can be opened in time for the 1992-93 academic year. Unless the Minister can give a satisfactory and definite answer to these questions the people of Ashbourne will believe that the school is being put on the long finger yet again.

Ba mhaith liom leithscéal an Aire Oideachais, an Teachta O'Rourke, a ghabháil leis an Teach agus leis an Teachta Bruton os rud é nach bhfuil ar a cumas bheith i láthair chun freagra a thabhairt ar an cheist. D'iarr sí orm ionadaíocht a dhéanamh thar a ceann.

On the Minister's behalf I would like to thank Deputy Bruton for giving us an opportunity of outlining the position in the case of Ashbourne community school and allowing me to emphasise the Minister's commitment to seeing that this project proceeds to construction as quickly as possible. It is important that I would briefly review developments to date as this will illustrate that while progress may appear to be slow to the concerned parent, teacher or local representative, it is actually a case of very careful planning to ensure that what is to be constructed will best meet the needs of the locality and conform to the overall post-primary needs of the general area.

Originally, a school for 800 pupils was proposed for Ashbourne. We encountered some initial delay at the architectural planning stage due to difficulties in acquiring a suitable site and the need to clarify the position regarding proposals for roads development. When the site was finally obtained, a review of enrolments and projections for the area resulted in the plans for Ashbourne being revised to provide for a school for 650 pupils.

Following this the planning process got under way with a briefing session for the design team in the Department of Education and since then has been proceeding normally. As is the case with all such projects the design of the building involves a good deal of complex planning by the design team, and detailed examination in the Department of each stage of the project is required to ensure that the best possible building is provided for the people of Ashbourne. During the process the Minister has continued to monitor progress and she has constantly kept in contact with local interests to keep them informed of developments.

I appreciate Deputy Bruton's sincere interest in this project but I must also acknowledge that his constituency colleague, Deputy Wallace, is also in continuous contact with the Minister about this project.

As is Deputy John Farrelly.

Deputy Bruton may be aware that only last December in response to a question on the Adjournment the Minister was able to announce that a technical examination of the detailed design stage had just been completed and the Minister instructed her Department to request the design team to prepare the next stage, Stage 5, the bill of quantities. Currently, the design team are completing their preparation of the bill of quantities and this is expected in the Department shortly.

I would like to make a brief reference to the background of this project. Approval was given for a new school in 1982 and one has to ask what happened between 1982-87. I must say on the Minister's behalf that more progress has been made between 1987-91 than in the previous five years. I do not wish to suggest at this hour of the night which Members might have been in Government during the period 1982-87. I am surprised that Deputy Bruton should listen to rumours circulating in the area that the architects were told to go slow and that they had more attractive work to do. Deputy Bruton knows well the commitment to education of the Minister for Education. I do not have time to list the number of schools the Minister has been responsible for, from Malin Head, down the west coast, up the east coast and in the midlands. I am surprised that Deputy Bruton would suggest that somebody would ask the architects to go slow. The Minister has a proven track record since 1987.

The Deputy is well aware of the system. When the bill of quantities is received it will have to be carefully examined in the Department, and that is absolutely necessary, and if it is found to be in order the next stage, which is the invitation of tenders, will go ahead.

The Minister has stated on many occasions previously that it is her intention that there will be no undue delay with this project and she wishes to emphasise her commitment to having this school provided as soon as is practicable.

When will tenders be invited?

We are not in auction politics.

Barr
Roinn