Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 12 May 1993

Vol. 430 No. 6

Adjournment Debate. - South-East Infrastructural Development.

I wish to share my time with Deputy Deasy. I intend no disrespect to the Ministers present but I am disappointed there is no representative from the Department of Finance here. However, I hope the Minister will convey my important comments to the relevant people.

The economic wellbeing of the south-east is dependent on what happens in the next round of Structural Funds. In the past few years, among the seven regions, the south-east received the worst treatment in terms of the spend per region. It was substantially lower for the south-east than for the other regions. There is no economic basis for that. It cannot occur in the next round of Structural Funds. It will be unacceptable. There is deep concern among the industrial and commercial communities and the public in Waterford city and county and throughout the south-east region in this regard. Two projects have been put forward for a number of years that are crucial to the development of the south-east. One of those is the construction of a second river crossing in Waterford. The city cannot survive and the economic area cannot develop if that infrastructure is not put in place. The Minister is aware that the premier European lo-lo port is being created in Waterford at present. It is vital that the necessary infrastructure to meet the requirements of the load for that port is put in place. Otherwise the economic position of Waterford and its status as capital of the south-east will deteriorate. That structure is supported by all counties in the south-east and is recognised in the sub regional review committee's submission on the national plan as a vital infrastructural development to service the south-east. The road network in the south-east is a national carrying route. The Euro-route through Waterford carries goods from all over Ireland to this port. Without this infrastructure the port will not develop at the rate it should.

The Minister is aware of numerous reports in regard to the lack of third level facilities in the south-east. Numerous meetings have taken place with the Department of Education in regard to a university to be located in Waterford. If we do not receive funding for those infrastructural developments there will be a deterioration in the economic wellbeing to the detriment of Waterford city and county and the south-east as a whole. It is time that the south-east was fully recognised and re-established as a crucial entity in the national economic development of this country.

I thank Deputy Cullen for allowing me to share his time. It is regrettable that the Minister for Finance and his junior Minister are not here. I hope our views will be conveyed to the Minister and his senior officials. The people of Waterford feel strongly about the neglect of recent years in regard to the allocation of Structural Funds. They regard their city, urbs intacta, as the forgotten city. What we are asking tonight is not exceptional. We are asking for a fair share of Structural Funds, no more and no less. In the last allocation there was a huge imbalance and the south-east were allocated much less proportionately than other regions of the country. Our greatest concern is that the infrastructure in Waterford be raised to the same level as other parts of the country, whether Cork, Limerick or Galway. We want to see the road from Dublin to Waterford brought up to a reasonable standard. The last 30 miles stretch of the road from Gowran in County Kilkenny to Waterford city is a disgrace. Little or not work has been carried out on that road, the N9, for the past 40 years.

The railway line from Dublin to Waterford also needs to be upgraded. At present the fastest train trip from Waterford to Dublin takes two hours and 25 minutes. A comparable trip on the Dublin-Cork line takes over an hour less. I believe it would be possible to reduce the train journey from Dublin to Waterford by one hour if the standard of the line was sufficiently good, which is not the case at present.

As Deputy Cullen said, a second bridge over the River Suir in Waterford city is urgently required. The proposals in this regard have been with the Department of the Environment and the Department of Finance for approximately seven years. I should like to see these proposals implemented. Waterford city will be strangled with traffic if the present bridge has to cater for the heavy, industrialised traffic which comes from Rosslare and Belview Port.

We demand proper infrastructural facilities for Waterford. If we have the necessary infrastructure we will look after ourselves from there on in. As I said, we are not looking for any special treatment; all we want is a fair crack of the whip. We also need funds for the completion of the ring road in Waterford. The Dunmore approach into the city is strangled by traffic due to the fact that the road system, which is only partially completed, is inadequate. It is a disgrace that the entire road cannot be completed. While I would not say that the money spent to date has been wasted, it has not been maximised as it should have been and it will not be maximised in the proper way until the ring road is completed.

At the outset I wish to apologise on behalf of the Minister of State at the Department of Finance, Deputy Eithne Fitzgerald, who is unable to attend in the House to reply to this matter.

The current Community Support Framework for EC Structural Funds will expire at the end of 1993. The preparation of a new national development plan, which will form the basis of negotiation with the EC Commission on the next Community Support Framework for the post-1993 period, is under way. Considerable work has been undertaken to date both within Government Department and State agencies and by the many other groups and organisations with an interest in this area.

In May 1992 the seven sub-regional review committees set up to review implementation of the Structural Funds were formally invited to make submissions containing their views on the content and strategy of the next plan, CSF and operational programmes in so far as they would affect each sub-region. Funding was provided to the committees to employ consultants to assist in the preparation of their submissions and to hold briefing seminars to which interested groups in the sub-region were invited. The review committees forwarded their submission to the Department of Finance in October and November of last year. These submissions are being examined by the Department and have also been circulated to other relevant Departments so that they can be taken fully into account in the planning work under way.

The south-east submissions set out a development strategy to build on the subregion's strength and address its disadvantages with a view to ensuring the best contribution towards sustainable employment and growth. The submissions draw particular attention to deficiencies in the areas of transport, communications and sanitary services infrastructure. Specific projects mentioned, such as the high level bridge, have been referred to the relevant Ministers for consideration in drawing up sectoral proposals.

The Minister of State at the Department of Finance with particular responsibility for the National Development Plan met the different committees, including the South-East Committee, to discuss their submissions. In the light of the large demands in relation to funds likely to be available, the committees were asked to identify their key priorities. The additional submission from the south-east on these priorities has now been received and it includes particular priorities in relation to infrastructure and makes specific reference to the needs of Waterford city, including the high level bridge.

In addition to the submissions from the sub-regional review committees there are other inputs into the planning process. Government Departments were asked to prepare proposals in relation to their various sectors. In May 1992 the social partner organisations represented on the Central Review Committee were invited to make submissions on their views on the content and strategy of the next plan, community support framework and operational programmes. The Chambers of Commerce of Ireland and the Council for the Status of Women were also invited to make submissions. Submissions have been received and are being examined in detail in the various Departments concerned with a view to taking them into account in the preparation of the plan.

A number of other organisations have made submissions on their views in relation to the content of the next plan and/or have met departmental officials to discuss their views. A group of consultants led by the ESRI were engaged in early October to carry out an evaluation of the CSF 1989-93 and to make recommendations for strategies and priorities for the next national development plan. Discussions are ongoing with the EC Commission on the strategic choices and priorities as perceived by them and on the strengthening of material in relation to evaluation and indicators.

We have agreed with Northern Ireland that a joint co-operative approach should be incorporated in both our plans. The Department of Finance and the Northern Ireland Department of Finance and personnel have held a number of meetings to discuss how this concept can best be advanced. Other relevant Departments North and South have been in contact with each other in order to identify where their proposals contain complementary elements or elements which can be implemented on a joint basis. These interdepartmental contacts are continuing.

In the light of the various consultations and inputs the Government is now preparing the draft national development plan with a view to finalising its work around the end of June. The central objective of the Government will be the creation of sustainable employment and growth. In this context the Government is very anxious that the measures chosen will tackle the particular problem of long term unemployment. In selecting the strategies that best meet these objectives the focus will have to be on the long term return to the economy from the investments included and on getting the best value for money possible.

The demands for the funds from the various Departments amount to more than double any likely funds available. If one adds the demands from various groups, it is clear that very difficult choices will have to be made in choosing the optimal mix of investments for inclusion in the final plan. In finalising the plan the Government will seek to ensure balanced regional development. The needs of Waterford and the south-east, as set out in detail in the sub-regional committee's submission, along with the needs of other areas throughout the country, will be fully taken into account.

Barr
Roinn