Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 2 Dec 1993

Vol. 436 No. 6

Written Answers. - Sea Fisheries and Aquaculture Licensing.

Helen Keogh

Ceist:

54 Ms Keogh asked the Minister for the Marine if he will make a statement on his response to the request from both the sea fisheries and acquaculture sides for the establishment of an independent licensing body and a transparent appeals mechanism.

There are three essential components to the question raised by the Deputy. These relate to responsibility for the making of policy, responsibility for the execution of policy and to mechanisms for appeal against decisions taken.

The making of policy is a political responsibility vested in the Government and the Minister and overseen by the Houses of the Oireachtas. Responsibility for policy making cannot be devolved to any executive or independent body and any such body would have to observe whatever policy guidelines are laid down. In many areas of administration, and this is especially so in areas of fisheries administration, the difficulties and grievances which many individuals raise relate to policy issues rather than alleged unfairness in handling any particular case.

As regards the issues of licences and leases, one of the key considerations in deciding on structures is the relative cost effectiveness and efficiency of different arrangements. As of now I am satisfied that the devolution of licensing type functions in the Marine area to new executive agencies would not be cost effective. However, there is in progress a review of the licensing process for the aquaculture sector and I will consider carefully in this context the various views received.

The argument for an independent licensing body is sometimes put forward on the basis that there is an inevitable political bias in any system which is under the direct control of a Minister.

I do not accept that this is the case. Moreover, there are ample safeguards via the Office of the Ombudsman and the Courts to ensure that the citizen is protected against any unfairness in the making of individual decisions.

I do not at the moment see the need, therefore, for the setting up of any new special appeals system against individual decisions taken by the Minister for the Marine in the implementation of policy.
However, I would qualify the foregoing statement in so far as the Minister is involved in the taking of decisions of a planning nature where the results of the decision may have significant implications for individuals or groups other than those directly granted or refused a licence. This may be the case occasionally with foreshore or aquaculture licences and, especially so, where the local authority planning and appeals process does not apply. At the moment the only recourse available to an aggrieved party is appeal by judicial review or otherwise to the Courts. This process can be expensive and time consuming for all parties as well as being adversarial and divisive. While I have no immediate plans to change the present system, this is an issue which will be kept in mind in the ongoing review of the relevant legislation.
Barr
Roinn