Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 16 Feb 1994

Vol. 438 No. 8

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers - Tourism Promotion.

Desmond J. O'Malley

Ceist:

9 Mr. O'Malley asked the Minister for Tourism and Trade the future plans, if any, he has for Bord Fáilte and for the future promotion and development of tourism in this country in view of his statements on 10 February 1994; the location of the proposed decentralised tourism promotion; the organisation from which funds will be disbursed for the promotion and development of tourism; whether it is intended gradually to wind up Bord Fáilte; and whether any consultations have been held with the relevant interests.

Jimmy Deenihan

Ceist:

10 Mr. Deenihan asked the Minister for Tourism and Trade the role of the board of Bord Fáilte following his decision to establish the new Tourism Council as the policy-making body for tourism.

Ivor Callely

Ceist:

33 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for Tourism and Trade the proposals, if any, or involvement of his Department in marketing and selling Ireland as an ideal holiday location; the financial supports to State/semi-State bodies under the aegis of his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

Proinsias De Rossa

Ceist:

34 Proinsias De Rossa asked the Minister for Tourism and Trade the functions, if any, previously carried out by Bord Fáilte which have now been taken over by his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

36 Mr. J. O'Keeffe asked the Minister for Tourism and Trade the role and function of Bord Fáilte; and the degree to which his Department is directly involved in tourism promotion.

I propose to take Questions Nos. 9, 10, 33, 34 and 36 together.

The Government's objectives with regard to the future promotion and development of tourism have been stated unequivocally in the National Development Plan and, most recently, in the Programme for Competitiveness and Work. To achieve these objectives my Department's Estimates for 1994 include an allocation of £21.7 million to Bord Fáilte towards their overseas marketing and promotion. There is also a provision of £1.6 million to Shannon Development who are responsible, inter alia, for traffic and tourism development at Shannon and in the mid-west region. In addition a further £8 million is being made available for a tourism promotion and development fund.

Tourism is a key sector with considerable potential for generating significant growth in overseas revenue and a high level of sustainable employment. Tourism services are labour intensive and have a low import content. Revenue growth translates directly into job generation. As the Programme for Competitiveness and Work states: “tourism also acts as a powerful instrument of regional balance”.

Strategically, it is my intention to create the conditions necessary for the tourism sector to realise and hopefully exceed the key tagets set for it in terms of visitor numbers, revenue and employment for the end of the decade, which are: increase overseas visitor numbers by 1.7 million; increase overseas revenue by £1 billion; provide 35,000 new jobs, including 6,000 in construction.

I propose to meet these challenges by: reviewing the effectiveness of promotion and marketing of Ireland as a tourist destination; supporting the development of the Irish tourism product in quality, variety and value for money; improving the seasonal spread of tourism through marketing, product development, access and competitiveness programmes; improving training and quality standards in tourism; and ensuring the most effective use of EU Structural Funds for tourism.

Success in all of the above factors will be critical for Irish tourism, not only in terms of achieving the targets set but, even more importantly, in setting a solid basis for ensuring sustainable, quality, growth into the next millennium.

Consistent with this strategic perspective, I have systematically, since my appointment as Minister for Tourism and Trade, gone about encouraging all economic operators in this industry — which has unparalleled potential — to work as a powerful, cohesive unit. I have, for example, taken the most careful soundings in the industry about its future development and I have formally established a channel of advice from the industry directly to me in the form of the tourism council, which I chair. I have also taken a hard look at institutional roles in so far as they make a significant impact on the future development of the sector. For example, I have reviewed and reorganised the operations of my Department in regard to its tourism policy functions. I have reorganised the regional tourism structure. Similarly, I plan a significant review, with CERT, of manpower policy and training needs for the tourism sector, within a perspective focused on high standards to be realised by the end of this decade.

Simultaneously — I made no secret of this — I have been looking at the role of Bord Fáilte Éireann, as much in terms of its future potential and the sector's future requirements, as in terms of its historical performance or its current structure. The fact is, Bord Fáilte was established in 1939 under the Tourist Traffic Act, a full five and a half decades ago. Indisputably, in that time, Bord Fáilte has done much excellent work and while it has grown and developed organisationally throughout that process, it has done so much more in an organic fashion rather than in a way that might realistically be described as strategic response to great change. One has to ask the question if the organisation has fully and appropriately adapted over the years to the challenges of marketing Ireland as a tourist destination in the new, highly competitive, conditions that now prevail for tourism internationally. Put another way, bearing in mind the dictum that structure follows strategy, one can say that while we now certainly have a clearly defined strategy for tourism development, have we got the right structures to see it through?

In my opinion, Bord Fáilte is rightly regarded highly as a promotional body. But yet, it has many other functions — such as investment and product development, the provision of information services, the registration and regulation of accommodation and so forth — which, though very important in their own right, are not necessarily supportive of a promotional function. In fact, it could even be said that they could contribute to a significant deflection of team effort and commitment from the core promotional function.

This, then, is one of the key questions which I must seek to resolve. Namely, should all of these functions, ideally, be invested in one body at a time when the country has perhaps never required more of a single minded, dedicated, commitment to promoting our tourism potential abroad?

Another key issue is whether there are any special reasons why Bord Fáilte should be located in Dublin as opposed to some location outside of it.

I have been considering all of these things since my appointment as Minister for Tourism and Trade and I am very alive to the view that it may be unwise to draw firm conclusions one way or another in the absence of a comprehensive review of Bord Fáilte, with the assistance of consultancy expertise. I plan to take a final view on this matter in the very near future.

Overall, however, I am sure the House will agree that none of us, and no organisation concerned with tourism development, should be free from review and reassessment given that it is in the nature of change to require constant renewal and that change affects us all. If we do not get our policies, programmes and institutions right during this decade we will have ignored the demands of the new competitive environment and will untimately have served the promise of our tourism sector very badly indeed.

We have two further minutes to deal with priority questions.

When the Minister began his reply, Sir, we had ten further minutes.

It is a filibuster that goes on here every day.

The first half of that reply was waffle. It consisted of a repetition of what was in the Programme for Competitiveness and Work which, in turn, was a repetition of what was in the Programme for National Recovery. The Minister did come towards the point in the second part of his reply. Is he saying that we will have another review of Bord Fáilte before it is decided to finally wind it up? Is he aware that a review was completed as recently as 1986 which looked at the question of Bord Fáilte very thoroughly? What exactly is he saying about decentralisation? Is it being decentralised and, if so, where to? How does the Minister account for the major difference in the Supplementary Estimate that was circulated yesterday, incidentally before leave was given by the House to introduce it? It was quite different from subhead B3 where the £8 million will not now be granted to Bord Fáilte although the original Estimate said that it would. Is there any significance in that?

I never said that I would wind up Bord Fáilte. I took the opportunity today to say what I have been doing as Minister in the past year to get the structures right. I said on a number of occasions, here and outside the House, that Bord Fáilte is not immune from review and some changes. I said in the past fortnight that in the near future I would be coming forward with proposals for Bord Fáilte, and I will do that.

The question of decentralisation can be considered in the context of the review. I will not pre-empt the review of Bord Fáilte but I may come to the conclusion that it would be better to decentralise it and I am sure the Deputy's region would be a live candidate for the decentralisation if it were to happen.

I will be answering the last question asked by the Deputy at the meeting to discuss the Supplementary Estimate today. When the Minister for Finance announced an additional £5 million for tourism in his budget it was decided to amalgamate the £5 million and the £3 million under the control of the Department of Tourism and Trade.

Has Bord Fáilte's role as policy maker and adviser to the Minister now been transferred to the new tourism council? What is the role of Bord Fáilte? Is it only to oversee the staffing of Bord Fáilte?

The Minister for Tourism and Trade is responsible for tourism policy and the Deputy should have no illusions about that. The role of Bord Fáilte is as my executive agency. Many years ago the late Seán Lemass defined the role of executive agencies which I very much subscribe to. I am the Minister responsible and I will define policy and Bord Fáilte Éireann and other bodies under my control will carry out that policy. The role of Bord Fáilte at present is as it has always been. The role of the tourism council is to act in an advisory capacity to me. It brings together the State agencies, the industry and the Department in one forum so that the people in the industry have a direct channel of communication to the Minister to bring forward their ideas. Let nobody be in any doubt about who is responsible for tourism; I am responsible for it. Bord Fáilte is the executive agency charged with the promotion of Ireland abroad.

Is Bord Fáilte not a policy formulator?

That exhausts our time for priority questions. In keeping with the order, Question No. 11 will be taken as the first of the other questions.

Barr
Roinn