Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 29 Mar 1994

Vol. 440 No. 7

Written Answers. - Social Welfare Benefits.

Proinsias De Rossa

Ceist:

109 Proinsias De Rossa asked the Minister for Social Welfare if he has monitored the effectiveness of the new supplementary welfare assistance guidelines on assistance with ESB bills; if he has satisfied himself that all applicants are being treated equally and fairly; and the steps, if any, he will take to ensure that any anomalies in this regard are eliminated.

The code of practice on electricity and gas bills which I introduced in October 1993 is designed to assist people on social welfare payments who, because of exceptional circumstances encounter difficulty in meeting their ESB/natural gas bills. My Department in conjunction with the health boards and the utilities is monitoring the operation of the code.

Responses received from health boards to date indicate that the code is operating satisfactorily. There have been isolated difficulties in some areas and these will be pursued by my Department with the Electricity Supply Board and Bord Gáis Éireann as part of the ongoing review of the code to ensure that it functions as intended.

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

110 Mr. J. O'Keeffe asked the Minister for Social Welfare if his attention has been drawn to difficulties which have arisen for staff of the fire service throughout the country who, in applying for unemployment assistance, are being assessed for the first time with earnings received by them for fighting fires; his views on whether there are exceptional circumstances applicable in such cases because of the hazardous and dangerous nature of the service involved; if he will ensure that the position is restored so that the unique circumstances of part-time firemen continue to be taken into account; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

The 1992 Social Welfare Act provided for the assessment of insurable earnings as means for unemployment assistance purposes for all applicants. The preferential treatment previously accorded to claimants with income from insurable employment had its origins in the establishment of the unemployment assistance scheme. The legislation establishing the scheme provided that persons could have their means assessed while still employed so as to avoid any delay in authorising claims when they suffered a loss of work. By excluding income from current employment, the assessment reflected the situation that would exist when they became unemployed. At the time, that was a very necessary provision in circumstances where entitlement to unemployment benefit was very restricted.

The change in legislation was necessary; firstly, to ensure equity of treatment as between employees and self-employed persons claiming unemployment assistance who have always had their earnings assessed as means; and secondly, in recognition of the extension of insurance cover to part-time employees earning over £25 per week.

Self-employed persons claiming unemployment assistance have always been assessed with all of their self-employed earnings. This contrasted sharply with persons working in insurable employment who heretofore were not assessed with any means from part-time or casual employment. They could work for a few days in a week and qualify for unemployment assistance for the remaining days, regardless of their earnings for the days worked. Accordingly, an unjustifiable inequity had developedvis-à-vis self-employed claimants.
Evidence available indicates that in 1992 part-time firemen were in receipt of, on average, earnings of up to £90 per week without any reduction in their entitlement to unemployment assistance. Firemen attached to one particular station had earnings of over £300 per week, on average, in addition to their assistance payments of £100 per week. Self-employed persons with this level of earnings would have no entitlement to unemployment assistance.
The legislation provides for an amount of earnings to be disregarded. This amount was initially set at the daily rate of unemployment assistance for each day worked plus £10 per week. I reviewed this amount last year and increased it to the daily rate of unemployment assistance plus £15 per day worked. Thus at current rates a single person working three days per week can earn up to £74.60 without any means assessment; a married person with adult and three child dependants can earn up to £111.55 without any means being assessed.
In addition, part-time firemen are not required to sign-off the live register on any day during which they are called out on fire duty. Thus they receive unemployment assistance on a full six day per week basis less any means assessed. In the circumstances there is a considerable incentive for persons to accept positions with the part-time fire service and that no changes are warranted.
Barr
Roinn