Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 14 Jun 1994

Vol. 443 No. 7

Adjournment Debate. - Transfer of Agricultural Officers.

I thank you, a Cheann Comhairle, for giving me permission to raise this important issue in the House this evening. This problem should never have arisen. The situation has led to the suspension of the farm improvement scheme, the control of farm pollution scheme and the land improvement scheme, to hundreds of farmers in north and west County Roscommon. In addition it has delayed the start-up of the rural environment protection scheme in north and west County Roscommon, an area where there is huge interest in the scheme.

The genesis of the problem goes back to 14 February last when the three higher agricultural officers who operate all those schemes in the region were, without consultation, informed by the Department that they must cease operating from their home offices and transfer to an office in Carrick-on-Shannon, County Leitrim which, for most of them, is miles from the location of their general operations.

This decision to transfer the officers bore no relationship to any necessity or common sense and had nothing to do with saving money or making the service more efficient or effective. It seemed to be wholly related to internal machinations within the Department and the need for someone to exercise authority.

The arrangement by which these officers operated from their home offices was most satisfactory and efficient. The location of their offices was conveniently spread in the area they serviced. The applicants were well aware of the location of their offices and the officers involved provided an excellent service to them. They were often available for consultation, advice and, indeed, inspections well outside office hours.

The officers, understandably, resisted through their union the very peremptory manner of their office transfer. The situation came to a head on 13 May last when the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry agreed an order removing these officers from the payroll of the Department, even though they had continued to work satisfactorily right up to that date and to carry out all the duties assigned to them. In effect, they were not or could not be punished for dereliction of duty, only for not obeying the ridiculous edict that they remove themselves from the work location that was convenient, effective and efficient for everyone to an office in another county that suits nobody apart from someone with an axe to grind.

The industrial action that followed this comedy of errors is having the most damaging effect on hundreds of farmers who have files being dealt with or due to be dealt with by these three officers. Every year in recent years these officers dealt with at least 200 new applicants under the various farm improvement and pollution control measures operated by the Department. In addition to the new applicants there was the carry-over and the ongoing work to deal with and to supervise.

These officers are no longer working and their colleagues, quite rightly, will not undertake any of their work. For the farmer applicants caught up in this dispute the situation is disastrous. Many of them are waiting for long overdue grant money. Others are waiting for inspections to be carried out and cannot commence work on silage slabs, control or effluent, winter housing and better holding facilities. May and June are the time of year when most of this work is done, there was a very large backlog this year as no work could be done because of the appalling weather in the first four months.

The net effect of this will be that hundreds of farmers who want to better their operation or control or eliminate their effluent problems will not be able to undertake such work this year. As far as they are concerned, and as far as I am concerned as a public representative living in the area, the service that existed heretofore worked well. It was conveniently located for the farmer applicants and was effective and efficient. The farmers want that service restored and so do I. I call on the Minister to intervene in this dispute. I believe it is a matter of internal machination within his Department and it is for him to resolve it. I call upon him to do so as quickly as possible.

I wish to set out for Deputy Connor the framework within which these transfers are taking place. The position is that all areas of work within the Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry are subject to review on a regular basis to ensure the most efficient use of resources available. In this context, a review of staffing arrangements in the farm development service is being undertaken countrywide to ensure efficient implementation of schemes in the most cost effective manner. In addition, the duties of field officers in this work area is evolving with a resultant reduction in "on-farm" inspections and an increase in office based duties. Consequently, it is considered necessary to relocate a number of officers to departmental offices in a number of counties.

The office in Carrick-on-Shannon, located on the Roscommon border, is geographically well located to allow the three officers concerned to service North Roscommon and I am satisfied that the transfers will not adversely affect the service to farmers in that area. The reorganisation envisaged is vital because of the evolving work role of field officers in the farm development service. At present, the level of activity in relation to pollution control and the farm improvement programme is quite low, pending the outcome of the negotiations for funding for these schemes under the national plan. However, there is adequate staff in County Roscommon to provide a service and give information as required in relation to these activities.

It is the policy of my Department, where possible, to house headquarter staff in official accommodation when it is available. I wish to remind the Deputy that agreement on payment of allowances to field officers who are based at their homes, and as negotiated by their union stipulates: "Should it be possible to headquarter an officer at a local Department office, at present or in the future, that officer would automatically lose entitlement to payment of an office accommodation allowance." In this context it should be noted that over many years my Department has conducted negotiations with the trade union concerned regarding locating officers at their homes.

The union has consistently emphasised the element of inconvenience to these officers and this was the reason for the payment of office allowances. It was always understood that the most appropriate headquarters for any officer should be in an official office.

I should also emphasise that the conditions of service under which these staff were appointed requires them to serve at whatever headquarters is required by the Department.

I am satisfied that coupled with this, the evolving role of field officers in the farm development service makes it necessary to locate officers in departmental offices wherever possible. I am further satisfied that the relocation of these officers to Carrick-on-Shannon is in the best interest of the provision of the most efficient and cost effective service to the farming community in North Roscommon.

If there are individual grant cases of which the Deputy is aware where there are difficulties, I will be happy to take representation on them and offer what assistance I can.

Barr
Roinn