I propose to take Questions Nos. 5, 8 and 53 together.
The Paris Commission, which deals with the prevention of all types of marine pollution, is primarily a matter for the Minister for the Environment. However, as on previous occasions, officials from my Department and the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland attended the meeting for agenda items concerning the discharges of radioactive substances into the marine environment.
Ireland was to the forefront in discussions at the meeting and again raised its long-standing grave concerns about the reprocessing activities at Sellafield and, in particular, the increased emissions arising from the operation of the new THORP plant. Most delegations supported Ireland in expressing anger at the UK and France's non-acceptance during the year of an Irish-sponsored recommendation on nuclear reprocessing plants, which had been adopted in 1993. The effect of this recommendation would be to oblige States to adopt all possible measures, including the application of best available technology and the precautionary principle, for the reduction and ultimate elimination of radioactive substances in the sea. The recommendation also stated that authorisations for radioactive discharges from nuclear reprocessing options had also been considered and a full environmental impact assessment was undertaken in advance. This year's meeting urged the UK and France to immediately reconsider their stance and to comply urgently with the provisions.
The Paris Commission at its meeting all last week in Sweden also adopted an Irish-sponsored recommendation for the carrying out of a study to assess both the reprocessing and non-reprocessing options for nuclear spent fuel management. The Irish view was that the non-reprocessing option, such as dry storage for spent fuel, constitutes the most effective, least environmentally damaging and best manner to achieve the aims of reduction and elimination of radioactive contamination into the sea. A third recommendation, sponsored by Ireland and the Nordic Countries, focused on the environmental impact resulting from discharges of radioactive substances. The Paris Commission agreed that, as a matter of urgency, a detailed examination should be undertaken of the further measure that can be adopted for the reduction and elimination of radioactive substances to the marine environment. My officials have taken a leading role in all of these Paris Commission discussions.
I am having Greenpeace's recent paper on arbitration under the Paris Convention examined, in consultation with the Attorney General. I must say, however, that this question has been considered in detail before and it has been found that there are limitations in such an approach in that there is not a lot of legal weight to that convention in relation to discharges of radioactive substances. Its usefulness is largely as an international forum for putting political and moral pressure on the UK, not as a source of legal obligations. Indeed, the Greenpeace organisation identified and recognised the disadvantages of the convention when it presented a different submission in 1990 to previous Ministers for Energy and for the Environment. Furthermore, the Paris Convention has no binding regulatory or authorisation functions in relation to the planning, building, commissioning or operation of industrial or nuclear plants such as THORP on territories of individual states.
As in the past, I and my officials will maintain unremitting international and diplomatic pressure in every appropriate forum and at every possible opportunity to highlight our concerns and to request the cessation of Sellafield's reprocessing facilities. Our opposition to Sellafield has already been raised at EC level, in the International Atomic Energy Agency, at the OECD-Nuclear Energy Agency meetings and at the Paris Commission and the London Dumping Convention. In addition, at Energy and Environmental Councils of the EU, responsible Ministers have persistently raised Ireland's concerns about the dangers arising from Sellafield's discharges and operations.