Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 8 Jun 1995

Vol. 454 No. 2

Order of Business.

It is proposed to take Nos. 1, 2, 14 and 15.

It is also proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders, that: (1) No. 1 shall be decided without debate; (2) the amendments from the Seanad to the Occupiers' Liability Bill, 1994 shall be taken together and decided without debate by one question which shall be put from the Chair; and (3) the statements on No. 14, if not previously concluded, shall be brought to a conclusion today at 12 noon and the following arrangements shall apply: (i) the opening statement of the Tánaiste, of the main spokespersons for the Fianna Fáil party and the Progressive Democrats party, and of each other Member called upon, shall not exceed 15 minutes in each case; and (ii) a Minister or Minister of State shall be called upon not less than ten minutes before the statements are due to conclude to make a statement in reply.

Private Members' Business shall be No. 21.

Is the proposal that No. 1 be decided without debate satisfactory? Agreed. Is the proposal for dealing with the amendments from the Seanad to the Occupiers' Liability Bill, 1994 satisfactory? Agreed. Are the proposals for dealing with No. 14 satisfactory and agreed? Agreed.

Will the Taoiseach give the House a clear indication of when the compellibility of witnesses Bill, which was ready six months ago, will be circulated? In advance of that, will the Taoiseach give an assurance to the House that the Attorney General will appear before the Select Committee on Legislation and Security in the next few weeks?

The compellibility Bill is under active consideration by the Cabinet. As the House is well aware, there are many difficult legal and constitutional questions to be considered. We will be in a position to make the Bill available to the House as soon as our decisions have been taken on the issue. In regard to the second part of the Deputy's question, that is a matter for the committee in question.

The constitutional issues to which the Taoiseach refers were well thrashed out during 1994, as a number of the members of the Government know. It seems to those of us on this side of the House that the only possible issue that could hold up the legislation is the difference between the Attorney General and the Taoiseach on whether he can appear before the committee.

This matter should not give rise to argument now.

We have been waiting six months for this Bill.

That may be so but there are other ways of progressing these matters.

When will the Government bring forward the amending legislation to the Sanitary Services Act, 1963 to restrict the powers of local authorities to disconnect people who have not paid service charges?

Quite soon.

Will it be in this session?

I would remind the Taoiseach of what is contained in the programme A Government of Renewal. It states that the Government will ensure that all appointees to high office in the State, including the Attorney General, the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Comptroller and Auditor General——

I do not think this is in order now.

——shall appear before committees of the House. Will the Taoiseach confirm that he will allow the Attorney General to appear before the Select Committee on Legislation and Security?

I am calling Deputy McCreevy.

So much for openness.

Is it the Taoiseach's intention to bring forward some measures in view of the publication of the OECD report which is the first negative comment on the Irish economy for several years?

All they do is smile.

Deputy Quill had been offering.

If this is putting presure on the Government, we are safe for another while.

Deputy Flanagan is sufficiently distanced from the Government.

Deputy Flanagan has to be next in line.

Is it the intention of the Government to introduce legislation to regulate Sunday trading and if so, when?

That is a good question, Deputy. It should be put down in the ordinary way.

The Taoiseach was just about to answer, a Cheann Comhairle. You are cramping his style.

Not now, Deputy Quill.

On a similar issue to the one raised by Deputy Bertie Ahern in relation to a package of measures which could be termed Dáil reform — the compellibility Bill and a promised review of the Official Secrets Act — given that measures were passed last week to restrict the privilege of Members, will the Taoiseach give an indication here that he will bring forward measures to deal with offences against Parliament and the broader issue of Ministers misleading the House? It is all to do with Dáil reform which the Taoiseach has indicated he will bring forward in the House.

To what specific legislation is the Deputy referring?

It is in the Programme for Government.

The Deputy should pursue that matter in another way.

Deputy McCreevy's question elicited a smile from the Government but has the Government studied the major significance of the OECD report for the Irish economy? What action will it take on it?

That does not arise now.

It arises very much for the people who are unemployed.

(Donegal South-West): Sir, I am seeking your guidance——

After Guadeloupe.

(Donegal South-West): I take my business seriously whether in this or in any other House. May I seek your guidance on how I should raise the proposed closure of 22 ESB offices, three of which are in my county?

If the Deputy communicates with my office he will get advice.

In view of the serious situation resulting from farm pollution spillage in County Cork, when is it proposed to reintroduce farm pollution grants? Is the Taoiseach aware that many of his farming friends are in grave difficulty because of this serious crisis?

They are not, because they are well off.

If the Government ignores this crisis it will become the greatest "polluting Government" this country has ever seen.

The Deputy did not do too much about it when his party was in power.

You failed to build a pier.

I am afraid we will have to ignore it now, Deputy.

Will the Taoiseach furnish the House with a copy of the report on Government leaks?

Will it be leaked?

If the matter was considered serious enough to have it investigated, surely it is serious enough to be discussed in this House.

The Taoiseach is nodding.

I will send a personally autographed copy of the report to the Leader of the Opposition.

Barr
Roinn