Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 12 Dec 1995

Vol. 459 No. 6

Written Answers. - Requests from Representative Organisations.

Ivor Callely

Ceist:

22 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for the Environment the normal procedures that apply for interested bodies/ approved authorities seeking to meet with him to discuss matters relating to his Department; if he will meet all such requests; if he has received a request from the Automobile Association; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18503/95]

It is my policy, as far as is practicable, to accede to requests from representative organisations to discuss matters for which my Department is responsible. It would not, of course, be possible to accede to all such requests; each is considered on its merits.

As regards the Automobile Association, I received a letter dated 1 November 1995 from the managing director seeking a meeting to explain the association's position on tolling and to present the results of market research commissioned by it. A detailed response issued to the association on 24 November pointing out, among other things:—

—that the statutory power to levy tolls on national roads, to make toll by-laws and to enter into toll agreements with private investors is vested in the National Roads Authority under Part V of the Roads Act, 1993;

—that before a toll can be imposed on any road, there are comprehensive procedures which must be complied with including the making of a toll scheme, the giving of public notice, consultation with local authorities and the submission of the scheme for the approval of the Minister;

—that where there are objections, a public local inquiry must be held before a decision is taken on the scheme, and that the AA and any other interested person or group would then have an opportunity to make its views known on the particular proposal.

The letter to the association went on to say that, as I have a quasi-judicial function in relation to toll schemes, it would not be appropriate for me to discuss or comment on possible tolling proposals for individual roads or categories of road, or to offer any other comments which might be regarded as prejudicing the future exercise of this function. It concluded by indicating, that for the reasons outlined, I could not accede to the request for a meeting to discuss the NRA's tolling proposals but that if the association wished to present the results of its research, a meeting for that purpose with my special adviser could be arranged. I understand that such a meeting is to take place later this week.
I believe that the response to the association's request for a meeting with me was the correct one, in the particular circumstances.
Barr
Roinn