Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 31 Jan 1996

Vol. 460 No. 7

Written Answers - Baldonnel (Dublin) Airport.

Austin Deasy

Ceist:

25 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for Transport, Energy and Communications if he has examined the feasibility of using the Baldonnel Airport, County Dublin on a joint military and commercial basis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [1905/96]

Mary Harney

Ceist:

48 Miss Harney asked the Minister for Transport, Energy and Communications if he has finalised his consideration of the proposal by Ryanair for a commercial airport at Baldonnel, County Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [2039/96]

Mary Harney

Ceist:

53 Miss Harney asked the Minister for Transport, Energy and Communications the plans, if any, he has for the future use of Baldonnel as an airport. [2038/96]

Ceist:

111 Mr. Ryan asked the Minister for Transport, Energy and Communications the general attitude to the proposal for a second commercial airport for Dublin at Baldonnel; and the effects, if any, this would have on the future of Dublin Airport and employment in north Dublin. [2125/96]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 25, 48, 53 and 111 together.

I considered very carefully the proposal for adapting Baldonnel military aerodrome as a second commercial airport for Dublin. The conclusion I reached, having consulted with my Cabinet colleagues, was that the project would not be in the interests of the aviation sector and the economy generally.

I made an extensive public statement on this issue last week and I have arranged for a copy of that statement to be placed in the Dáil Library for the convenience of Deputies. In summary, I pointed out that: Dublin airport has the capacity to cater for traffic growth for the foreseeable future; independent studies have shown that Aer Rianta's cost base is not excessive and that its landing charges are competitive; two airports for Dublin would duplicate infrastructure and facilities leading to increased costs as economies of scale would be lost. Airlines would be reluctant to transfer to a secondary location because of the loss of hubbing opportunities and integrated services that such a move would entail. The coming on stream of the Baldonnel proposal would coincide with the planned abolition of the intra-EC duty free sales from 1999 which will have adverse implications for all airports and airlines. In other words, the economics of Baldonnel would be problematic from the outset; a commercial airport at Baldonnel would impact not only on Dublin airport but on the catchment areas of Galway, Shannon, Cork and Waterford airports putting further pressure on some of these airports to survive or grow; the Baldonnel project would not come on stream until the end of the century, in the meantime the Dublin airport development programme cannot be put on hold. It would make no sense to enhance capacity at Dublin airport and at the same time provide capacity at another location.
Baldonnel aerodrome will continue to be used by the Air Corps. The Department of Defence will now pursue further the possible use of the facilities at Baldonnel for private executive air travel. But the Minister for Defence and I believe that there may be scope for making greater use of Baldonnel in this area of aviation.
Barr
Roinn