The tribunal found that yields in excess of 68 per cent — this was admitted by the Goodman organisation — were not made known to the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry. I have been advised that the evidence given at the tribunal would not be accepted as court evidence. On 5 May a senior official of my Department wrote to the Attorney General's office. The procedure followed is that we get legal advice and if it is decided to institute proceedings the matter is referred to the Chief State Solicitor's office. In this case, information has been sent to and fro based on the advice of the senior counsel that a certain type of evidence is required. I cannot give too many details as I might prejudice the case. I spoke to senior law officers of the State this morning and have arranged to submit a letter stating that having regard to the statute of limitations consideration I want all possible legal redress put in place. The secretary of the Department is not reluctant to assist me on this matter, he dispatched letters and so on. I am advised the amount of money involved may be small. However, the Department is committed to addressing the matter.
In regard to the number of years that may elapse, I have been advised that actions could not be taken while the tribunal was in session but that a legal process has been in train since it ended. I am concerned that the time limit under the statute of limitations will expire shortly and, if the legal advice is such, I will do everything possible to expedite proceedings.