Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 28 Mar 1996

Vol. 463 No. 5

Written Answers. - High Court Decision.

Michael P. Kitt

Ceist:

21 Mr. M. Kitt asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6711/96]

Tom Kitt

Ceist:

23 Mr. T. Kitt asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6709/96]

Seán Power

Ceist:

24 Mr. Power asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6708/96]

John O'Leary

Ceist:

25 Mr. O'Leary asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6712/96]

Micheál Martin

Ceist:

36 Mr. Martin asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6704/96]

M. J. Nolan

Ceist:

44 Mr. Nolan asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6706/96]

Donal Moynihan

Ceist:

51 Mr. Moynihan asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6705/96]

Denis Foley

Ceist:

56 Mr. Foley asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6714/96]

David Andrews

Ceist:

59 Mr. Andrews asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6720/96]

Matt Brennan

Ceist:

63 Mr. M. Brennan asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6719/96]

Joe Walsh

Ceist:

66 Mr. J. Walsh asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6717/96]

Seán Doherty

Ceist:

78 Mr. Doherty asked the Minister for Education the reason the Government is continuing to appeal the High Court decision regarding the O'Donoghue case concerning the rights of people with disabilities to an education in this country to the Supreme Court. [6715/96]

Minister for Education (Ms Bhreathnach)

I propose to take Questions Nos. 21, 23, 24, 25, 36, 44, 51, 56, 59, 63, 66 and 78 together.

In appealing the decision of the High Court in the case of Paul O'Donoghue the State is not appealing the central element in the High Court judgment — that a profoundly handicapped child is educable. Neither will the appeal, however it is resolved, in any way diminish the services made available, after this judgement, to the child involved or to children with similar disabilities. The appeal is being pursued entirely without prejudice to the present or future level of education services to such children.

The judgment, however, raises issues of more general concern, primarily to do with the separation of the powers and duties of the Executive and judicial arms of Government and the appropriate relationship between the two. These are constitutional matters of the utmost importance, having a relevance across the entire spectrum of State activities. The Government has been advised by counsel and the Attorney General that the Supreme Court, which has a special role in interpreting the Constitution, should, in the public interest, be asked to consider these aspects of the judgement. It is on this basis that an appeal has been lodged.