Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 26 Sep 1996

Vol. 469 No. 2

Céisteanna—Questions. Oral Questions. - Drug Treatment Services.

Liz O'Donnell

Ceist:

3 Ms O'Donnell asked the Minister for Health the number of registered drug addicts receiving treatment in each health board area; the number and duration of waiting lists for such treatment, where appropriate; the type of treatment available; the estimated number of addicts who have not yet registered; the budget for such drug treatment services per health board; the national initiative, if any, his Department proposes in respect of the demand side of the drugs crisis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17137/96]

(Limerick East): The provision of treatment and rehabilitation services for drug misusers is a matter for health boards in the first instance.

Drug misuse in this country takes two forms, the misuse of so-called "soft" drugs such as cannabis and ecstasy, which is prevalent throughout the country, and the misuse of heroin, which is confined mainly to certain parts of Dublin. The most recent report of the Health Research Board on treated drug misuse in the greater Dublin Area noted that in 1994, 2,702 persons received treatment for drug misuse in that year. The 1995 report, which will be published before the end of the year will have details of treatment from all over the country.

The Government decided in February of this year to implement a range of measures aimed at reducing the demand for drugs. These measures include strengthening existing school-based substance abuse programmes in conjunction with the Department of Education; boosting locally-based initiatives on education and prevention, in conjunction with education personnel, the Garda and other agencies; running national and locally-based drug awareness campaigns aimed at young people and their parents; and targeting specific education programmes at high risk areas such as the inner city.

They also recommend improving the service provision for drug misusers, particularly in Dublin city, where the problem is most acute. This is being done by extending locally-based drug treatment facilities in Dublin; giving general practitioners a wider role in the provision of treatment to stabilised drug misusers; co-ordination of detoxification facilities and improving rehabilitation. Since the Government decisions, all health boards have established regional co-ordinating committees to monitor the problem in their area and to make recommendations on the appropriate response.

Treatment for cannabis or ecstasy misuse generally takes the form of counselling and support while, for those misusing heroin, treatment involves a number of other therapies including drug substitution therapy, i.e. methadone.

A register of drug addicts receiving methadone treatment is maintained in the Eastern Health Board area. The total number of persons on this register at present is 1,552. There are in excess of 500 persons awaiting treatment for drug misuse in the Dublin area at present. The Eastern Health Board hopes to have cleared this waiting list by the end of the year. The nature of the problem is such, however, that as services develop more people come for treatment. It is not possible at this stage to put a definite figure on the number of heroin addicts in the city. The Eastern Health Board has concentrated on putting in place a comprehensive range of services as provided for in the decisions. These include the extension of locally based drug treatment facilities in Dublin, in consultation with local communities. Supports for community-based initiatives have been put in place in areas such as Kilbarrack, Clondalkin, Killinarden, Fettercairn and Ballyfermot; general practitioners will play a wider role in the ongoing maintenance on methadone of persons who have been stabilised in the treatment centres. Over 50 general practitioners are now involved; rehabilitation and support services have been further developed; special attention is being given to the problems of persons who smoke heroin. Detoxification programmes for young heroin smokers have been established in a number of centres; there has been an external evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of services in the Eastern Health Board area; the nuisance which drug misusers can cause in the vicinity of treatment centres and other locations is being alleviated by arrangements agreed between the Eastern Health Board and the Garda; the co-ordination of detoxification facilities has been improved. In addition, the number of detoxification beds has been increased and a downstream facility is in planning; a total of 1,552 people are now in receipt of methadone maintenance; crisis intervention programmes are being put in place in each of the health board's treatment centres; a mobile methadone service has been introduced; a treatment service has commenced in Ballymun; education officers are being recruited to work with "at risk" young people; an information database is being set up; and the board's management has been restructured. The Eastern Health Board is confident that the implementation of the measures outlined above will result in the provision of services for about 2,500 drug misusers by the end of this year. This will be a significant contribution to addressing the drug misuse problem.

The total amount of money allocated annually to health boards for HIV/AIDS and drug treatment and prevention services has increased steadily since 1992. For example, the allocation to health boards for these programmes in 1995 was approximately £13 million. This figure will increase by £4 million in 1996. It is not possible to put a specific figure on the allocation for drug treatment services by each health board because such services would range over a number of programmes, including psychiatric care and acute hospital care.

I assure the Deputy that services will continue to be developed and expanded to meet the threat posed by this scourge to society.

The Minister's response was very vague. What I had requested were specific targets and budgets reflecting a focus on and response to the urgency felt among many communities, particularly those in the greater Dublin area.

In relation to the methadone maintenance treatment services, which are being increased to include 2,500 addicts by the end of this year, in the week in which the methadone maintenance van was launched in this city what plans and safeguards have been put in place in the dispensing of methadone by this mobile unit? What safeguards exist to ensure a proper medical decision will be taken on the appropriateness of methadone maintenance in the case of individual recipients, given the danger experienced in other countries that the dispensing of methadone in this manner could well become part of the problem?

In regard to treatment by methadone maintenance, has there been a corresponding increase in resources to residential drug-free therapeutic programmes in this city?

(Limerick East): Underlying the Deputy's supplementary is a suggestion that there are better types of programme available than methadone maintenance, that perhaps this is not the route we should follow. There has been international debate on this over many years but it is now accepted international practice to run methadone or other analogous programmes as representing the only way forward. Of course, the ideal would be to have a drug-free society but we are a long way from that. As I understand it, the same Protocols will apply to those being dispensed methadone from the mobile clinic as apply at present in the case of fixed centres. Our biggest problem is that the supply of methadone provided through the health services is not sufficient to meet the demand. Even on the official waiting list, which is not a true reflection of the real position, there are 500 people awaiting methadone. In the Eastern Health Board area we are moving very rapidly, under the guidance of a new programme manager, to implement this programme with all due speed. We are playing catch-up.

I was amused to hear the Leader of the Opposition this morning lecture the Taoiseach about the evils of heroin, asking what services should be provided, when his constituency was the place first visited by this problem, which has obtained there for many a long year. The Deputy was a Minister for seven years from 1987 and must have been a Minister for 12 of his 20 years in the Dáil. When he had the wherewithal to do something about this problem — which is a huge one in his constituency — as Minister for Finance the resources were meagre. When I looked for extra money in 1996 for the methadone programmes and drug treatment programmes in Dublin — this is not meant to be a criticism of civil servants — there was no real awareness of the problem in the Department of Finance at official level. It seems to me that whatever way we deal with this, it will not be dealt with on a party political basis.

There is a crisis in Dublin both on the supply and treatment side. I am the first to admit that, even though I moved very rapidly when I became aware of the magnitude of the problem. We are still trying to catch up, in the face of great resistance from some communities. Everybody says heroin is causing frightful problems in Dublin, but if Deputies just try to negotiate a location for a clinic they will see the kind of pressures that will come on the methadone programmes.

A range of initiatives have been put in place and we are achieving results. We have made improvements but the services we are now providing through the Eastern Health Board have not yet reached the stage which I would consider adequate to meet the need. We are moving rapidly on this issue and it is a priority.

I agree this is an issue which in terms of urgency and political commitment transcends any party political boundaries and the Minister has my support in his efforts in this matter. I asked the Minister about a cross referenced list of registered addicts. There is some uncertainty as to whether persons are showing up a couple of times on the same lists in the methadone clinics. Does the Minister not accept it is very important to have an up to date data base so that we know what we are dealing with in terms of the methadone maintenance facility?

In July the Government promised that rehabilitation places would be increased from 60 to 250. Has that happened in the light of the ongoing crisis? In response to the Minister's comment that I was criticising the increase in the methadone maintenance programme, I accept, as does the Minister, that it is not a perfect solution. It is only suitable in the short-term for chronic drug abusers. It should not be the main plank of any Government's response to our drugs crisis.

(Limerick East): I stand over the methadone maintenance programme because it can prove very effective. Methadone is a drug but both from a health and a social point of view, there are enormous advantages to having people on a drug which is not destructive rather than them being on a drug, such as heroin, which is very destructive to their health, to their family and to their associates. On the question of rehabilitation and detoxification, I will send the Deputy the Eastern Health Board programme which is very detailed and I will also send a copy of the latest progress report I received on implementation of the plan.

According to that progress report, a four step rehabilitation programme is being initiated in each treatment centre. Together with this, extra rehabilitation is being provided at Soilse, in Henrietta Place. Voluntary services are being funded to provide extra places so that an overall target of 250 places can be provided in 1996. They are confident they will have 250 places by the end of this calendar year, although I cannot say exactly how many places are available at the moment. In the past six months a total of 64 patients have been admitted to the in-patient detoxification unit in Cherry Orchard Hospital. Mechanisms are being put in place to evaluate and streamline this programme. Negotiations have taken place with a voluntary agency to provide after care to enable the throughput of the expensive in-patient unit to be increased. An extra five beds are scheduled to be opened shortly.

There is a great deal of very specific detail in both the Eastern Health Board programme and the progress reports. I will put a suitable pack of information together for the Deputy so she will have all the information she requests on the specifics.

The Minister indicated that up to 2,500 people will receive methadone by the end of this year. Will the Minister guarantee that all of those people will receive accompanying counselling and therapeutic services as well as methadone maintenance? Does the programme rely on methadone maintenance simpliciter?

(Limerick East): I cannot give such a guarantee. The programme is that as soon as addicts who are put on methadone are stabilised in the clinics, they will be moved out to a GP. As many of the addicts are GMS patients, it would be appropriate if they could be moved to their own GPs where they are listed. The GPs provide counselling. Where the programme is working properly, it is working very well, but there are areas of unevenness in it. Our policy is to move addicts towards the GPs. I thank the GPs who have participated. Sometimes it is difficult for a GP to participate but we are getting very good co-operation now.

It seems to me that rather than having clinics with large populations of methadone users calling twice a week, it would be much better if stabilised patients in very small numbers attended a very large number of GPs in different parts of the city so that the geographic intensity of addicts going to a clinic would be reduced. Through that system we would get a greater community acceptance of what we are doing and less community resistance. It is difficult enough to deal with addicts, but when local communities are pitched against trying to provide health services, it becomes extremely difficult.

Barr
Roinn