Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 18 Feb 1998

Vol. 487 No. 4

Adjournment Debate. - Architectural Heritage.

I welcome the opportunity to raise this important and pressing matter. On Tuesday, 16 December I tabled a question to the Minister for Finance asking the proposals, if any, he had to refurbish and make safe the ruined church at Faithlegg, County Waterford. His reply indicated that this was a matter for his colleague, the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands. The reply went on to state that the ruined church was not in State ownership or guardianship and that, consequently, carrying out works there was not a matter for the national monuments and historic properties service of the Department of Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands.

I then tabled a question to the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands in which I asked her to take the ruined church at Faithlegg into State ownership or guardianship and to carry out the necessary refurbishment in view of the historical importance of the church as well as the safety of the public. The Minister replied that recognition and legal protection had been afforded to the ruins of the church and the adjoining graveyard pursuant to the provisions of section 12 of the National Monuments (Amendment) Act, 1994, and, as a consequence, any person proposing to carry out any work at or in relation to the monument must give notice of such intention and shall not commence the work for a period of two months after having given such notice. She went on to say that having regard to the current extensive level of commitments in the region in question, Dúchas, the heritage service of the Department, was unable to take the ruined church at Faithlegg into State care and that when resources permitted the matter would be carefully reconsidered.

Her response was totally unsatisfactory and inadequate. Apart from the historical and architectural importance of the ruined church, there is considerable concern regarding its safety given that it is situated adjacent to the Catholic church and within the local graveyard. Brother Laurence O'Toole described it as a well preserved ruin of a good sized architecturally satisfying old church, side by side with the parish church. All the evidence points to the late 14th and early 15th century as the date of construction of the ruined church. It is, therefore, pre-Reformation and would have been used for Catholic worship right up to the time of Cromwellian forfeiture of the Faithlegg property. After this it gradually fell into ruin.

The ruined Faithlegg church has been described by the Office of Public Works as follows:

The building warrants preservation and a conservation project should be undertaken before deterioration and masonry collapse, especially in the sacristy, make the task all the more difficult and expensive. Initially the structure should be liberally sprayed with a weed killer solution to kill the vegetation and the vegetation allowed to decay before removal so as not to destroy masonry.

The ivy has been removed from the ruin and it has been put strongly to me that this has caused the ruin to become unsafe. I put it to the Minister in the strongest terms that her decision to stand idly by in relation to this important national monument is not good enough from a safety or heritage point of view. She must take responsibility for the matter and have the necessary works carried out.

I thank the Deputy for raising this matter as it gives me an opportunity to clarify the position.

In reply to the Deputy's question on 28 January I referred to the many commitments of Dúchas, the heritage service of my Department, regarding the maintenance and conservation of national monuments within the south-eastern and southern national monument regions. I am pleased to have the opportunity to give details of some of the more significant commitments of the service.

Under the EU Operational Programme for Tourism 1994-99, funding has been provided for a number of projects in the regions. Work is under way on projects at Roscrea Castle, County Tipperary, Tintern Abbey, County Wexford, which will be opened this summer, the Rock of Dunamase, County Laois, Gowran Church, County Kilkenny, and the mainguard, Clonmel, County Tipperary. Further EU and Exchequer funds have been committed to projects at Dungarvan Castle, County Waterford and Charlesfort in Kinsale. It is expected that work on these projects will commence in the near future.

This work often involves an archaeological excavation of the site, followed by conservation works, presentation of the site and the provision of access to the public. When appropriate, restoration or partial restoration of the monument is undertaken. The integration of a visitor facility at the monument site, including an exhibition-display area, guide service, tea rooms and toilets, is undertaken at some sites. A fine example of such work is the project currently under way at Tintern Abbey. Following excavation, conservation of the cloister was undertaken. Conservation and partial restoration of the old coach buildings to provide a visitor facility is currently in progress. The conservation and restoration work being undertaken to the castle, round tower and friary in Roscrea is another testimony to the success of these projects.

As I am sure the Deputy is aware, such projects require, by their nature, to be methodically and painstakingly undertaken to do justice to the archaeological, historical and architectural significance of the monuments. They require a high degree of skilled workmanship and consequently take a longer time to complete. In order that maximum benefit is derived from the EU-Exchequer funds which have been allocated under the operational programme for tourism, it is essential that priority be given to the completion of projects which are so funded. Funding for these projects expires in 1999 and it is expected that the work will continue at least until the end of that year. In addition to the extensive programme of works funded under the operational programme, Dúchas has responsibility for the conservation and maintenance of approximately 150 national monuments in the two regions. Extensive conservation works require to be carried out at a number of sites.

I accept that Faithlegg church is of architectural and historical significance. The monument is in good structural condition, although conservation work will be required. However, given the resource constraints which I have outlined, I am unable at present to take the church into State care. The heritage service of my Department is prepared to give advice to a local organisation which is prepared to carry out the work required to ensure its preservation. I strongly recommend this course of action as it will be a number of years before the service is in a position to undertake the work.

Barr
Roinn