Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 25 Feb 1998

Vol. 487 No. 7

Written Answers. - Performance Appraisal Ratings.

John Perry

Ceist:

45 Mr. Perry asked the Minister for Defence further to Parliamentary Question No. 370 of 28 January 1998, the reason that almost 30 per cent of officers of the PDF were not rated under the formal performance appraisal system in both 1995 and 1996; the implications, if any, of this non rating for the careers of the officers concerned in view of the fact that the formal performance appraisals are the primary material used by promotion boards in selecting officers for promotion; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4860/98]

Frances Fitzgerald

Ceist:

191 Ms Fitzgerald asked the Minister for Defence further to Parliamentary Question No. 370 of 28 January 1998, the reason that almost 30 per cent of officers of the PDF were not rated under the formal performance appraisal system in both 1995 and 1996; the implications, if any, of this non-rating for the careers of the officers concerned in view of the fact that the formal performance appraisals are the primary material used by promotion boards in selecting officers for promotion; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5226/98]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 45 and 191 together.

While not all officers may receive a rating on an annual basis under the formal appraisal system all officers are subject to some form of annual appraisal under the annual confidential reporting system. For example, where an officer has served under a number of different commanding officers for periods of less than four months in each period or where an officer changes appointment the officer would be appraised under the annual confidential reporting system but would not be given an overall rating. Likewise where an officer has served overseas during the year there would not be a formal appraisal rating but instead an overseas report would be completed. Where an officer is being considered for promotion by an interview board and where the candidate has been under the command of a number of different commanding officers in a given year and has, therefore, not been given a rating, the interview board has available to it the reports of the various commanding officers to whom the candidate reported in the reporting year. Such officers would not, therefore, be disadvantaged by the absence of an overall rating.

Barr
Roinn