It is proposed to take Questions Nos. 313, 316 and 322 together.
The issues raised by the Deputies arise from the introduction of class A PRSI for community employment, CE, workers which was provided for in the Social Welfare Act, 1996, and which was designed to enhance the PRSI status of CE workers and to put them on a par with other class A workers.
Class A PRSI provides cover for the full range of benefits and pensions available under the social insurance system including, for example, unemployment benefit, disability benefit, maternity benefit, retirement pension, old age (contributory) pension, widow's (contributory) pension, treatment (dental and optical) benefits and occupational injuries benefit.
One of the consequences of the measure is that CE workers who return to the live register may qualify or requalify for unemployment benefit as a result of having paid class A PRSI contributions. In such cases, their earnings in the relevant tax year will determine whether or not they receive a graduated rate or the full rate of unemployment benefit. Persons entitled to a reduced or graduated rate of unemployment benefit are entitled to claim unemployment assistance if it is more beneficial to them. However, long-term unemployment assistance is not payable where the claimant is entitled to full rate unemployment benefit.
The social welfare secondary benefits, which comprise the Christmas bonus, the free fuel allowance and butter vouchers, are payable only with long-term social welfare payments.
Unemployment benefit claimants do not, therefore, have an entitlement to these benefits. It should be noted that secondary benefits can, however, be retained if the person transfers from a CE scheme to a back-to-work allowance scheme or Jobstart, etc.
It is important to note also that, as regards income-related secondary benefits such as rent allowance or mortgage supplements and the back to school clothing and footwear allowance available under the supplementary welfare allowance scheme, medical cards and differential rents, the position is that, in the normal course, former CE workers who are solely dependent on a social welfare payment should continue, where appropriate, to receive these benefits.