Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 13 Oct 1998

Vol. 495 No. 1

Priority Questions. - Fourth Pan-European Ministerial Conference.

Alan M. Dukes

Ceist:

36 Mr. Dukes asked the Minister for the Environment and Local Government the steps, if any, he proposes to take to give effect to the conclusions of the Fourth Pan-European Ministerial Conference, An Environment for Europe, held in Aarhus, Denmark in June 1998; if his attention has been drawn to the conclusions adopted by 84 parliamentarians from 36 European countries and Japan at that time; if so, his views on those conclusions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17690/98]

The Fourth Pan-European Ministerial Conference in Aarhus covered a wide range of issues relating to the environment of Europe as a whole. In so far as my Department is concerned, the main items for decision were the Convention on Access to Environmental Information and Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making, the protocols on the control of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants, and a programme for the phase-out of leaded petrol. On behalf of Ireland, I signed the convention and the two protocols at Aarhus. My Department is carrying out a detailed examination of the terms and implications of the ratification of the convention. It is my intention to ensure Ireland is in a position to ratify it as quickly as possible.

In relation to the protocols on heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants, I am satisfied that current and planned measures under Community and Irish law, including integrated pollution control licensing and control of products, are adequate to ensure compliance with both protocols.

As Ireland is committed to phasing out leaded petrol by 2000, the 2005 deadline endorsed at Aarhus will not pose a problem.

Other aspects of the conclusions relating to, for example, climate change, energy efficiency and participation in improved environmental monitoring at European level, will be taken into account in ongoing environmental management and protection measures.

The conclusions adopted by the European and Japanese parliamentarians at their conference in Aarhus constitute a valuable contribution to the debate on environmental policy and I will have regard to them in the future formulation of relevant policy initiatives.

I am glad the Minister regards the conclusions of the parliamentarians as an interesting contribution to the debate but does he intend to do more than that, particularly bearing in mind that in 1977, the Minister is listed as a member of GLOBE, which organised the conference? Will he pay particular attention to the conclusions of the parliamentarians regarding the integration of sustainable development into policy in all economic sectors, the use of sustainable development audits, measures to tackle endocrine disrupting chemicals, and preparation for the forthcoming COP4 conference in Buenos Aires? Does the Minister intend to bring proposals before the House in view of those conclusions? Does he intend to take action to deal with the fact that, in spite of the conclusions of the Ministers at the Aarhus conference, few countries have put measures in place to control emissions, as they agreed to do at Kyoto, and that none of the major polluting countries has ratified the Kyoto protocol? Will the Minister indicate what he intends to do about those areas as a result of the conference he attended in Aarhus?

The Deputy will appreciate there is little I can do about another sovereign country's decision on the signing of the Kyoto protocol. In relation to the conclusions of the parliamentarians, they also welcomed the ministerial decisions on access to information and protocols on heavy metals and stressed the importance of parliamentarians' involvement in the environment for Europe process. That is a process which I readily endorse.

The other matters are already in hand, started in some cases by my predecessor through the sustainable development policy document which he launched, and in some cases since I came into office, particularly in the important area which the Deputy highlighted of integrating environmental policies across areas such as agriculture, energy and so on. As part of that process we have set up the green network in Government Departments where, on an interdepartmental basis at Assistant Secretary level, group meetings and meetings on a bilateral basis are held on matters of policy which cut across those various areas.

The Deputy rightly emphasises the importance of integration, not just at home. It is an active and important issue being pursued at European level as well. There has been a number of joint councils, particularly in relation to transport and energy. I assure him these conclusions are welcome and are being implemented by me as part of the overall process of putting sustainable development at the centre of Government policy.

We must now move to Question No. 37.

Before we move on, could I ask——

The six minutes allocated for the question are up. The Deputy knows the rules, he should abide by them.

I know the rules but perhaps we might fortify those rules which allocate the time between the Minister and the questioner.

The Minister must reply to Question No. 37.

Barr
Roinn