I thank the Minister for coming into the House to reply to this matter. He is committed to the development of schools and it is disappointing that I have to raise a matter such as this on the Adjournment.
In June 1996 the then Minister, Niamh Bhreathnach, sanctioned a new school with four classrooms to replace the existing schools of Carrowreagh and Doocastle and allocated £250,000 for the project. Since then numerous verbal promises have been given to the chairman and there was a visit from Dermot McCormack who met a number of the parents of the pupils. To date the parents have not seen any progress. I have received a letter from the chairman of the board of management asking when the school will be completed and ready for occupation.
Last week's Sligo Champion carried the headline “South Sligo parents threaten boycott at rat-infested school” and that is the main reason I raised this matter tonight. It is very bad that such a headline should have been carried in a provincial newspaper in this technological age, having regard to what the Department is doing to promote education. What is stated in that headline should not have to happen. I am concerned about the condition of that school. I am sure the Minister will give me assurances tonight and that we will be able to resolve the problem.
Furious parents, whose children are being taught in a rat-infested school, issued an ultimatum to the Minister, "give us our new school or our children stay at home". Those parents will withdraw up to 50 children unless they receive an assurance that work will commence on the long promised school next year. This is the second time the parents have threatened to boycott the school, which has a leaking roof, plaster peeling off the walls and no indoor toilet facilities. Conditions at the two teacher school are so cramped that when a remedial teacher visits she has to hold her class in a damp corridor.
A start up date has been promised on four occasions, but each time the Department of Education and Science has employed delaying tactics. I am not saying those tactics were employed at the Minister's instigation. The board of management and parents had hoped that work would start on the new school this year after planning permission was granted last July, but the latest news is that the project will not go to tender until the end of January. They have been given so many promises that they have issued a letter which asks the Minister to prevent this boycott on 11 January by providing written confirmation of the timescale involved, the commencement date of the school building and the likely opening date of the new school. That is why I consider it important to raise this matter before the Christmas recess.
This issue has been ongoing for some time, but the Minister has been in office for more than 18 months. The parents of the pupils of Carrowreagh school and the board of management want the Minister to categorically state in the House that work on the school building will commence next January. I hope the Minister will give that assurance tonight.
Another factor in the delay in commencing work on the building of the new school is the increased amount required in respect of the local contribution which has been collected over a number of years. More local funding is required now than was required three to four years ago, another outcome of the delay in commencing work on the building of the new school. Will the Minister provide written confirmation of the timescale involved, the commencement date for building and a likely opening date for the school? This would prevent an unnecessary boycott on 11 January. It is important that clarification is provided tonight and that this issue is settled before Christmas.