Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 17 Feb 1999

Vol. 500 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - National Lottery Funding.

Last Friday was the closing date for completed applications from sports, social and youth clubs under the sports capital programme. Unfortunately, since the Government came to power 20 months ago, minimal grants have been made under this programme. For example, just a few clubs in my constituency received the paltry sum of about £4,000 between them last year.

The Minister, Deputy McDaid, constantly repeated the mantra that he was reviewing the programme and I, like other Deputies, had many lengthy discussions with him in the lobbies of this House about how he wanted to redesign and refocus it towards major projects. There was a time when the applications for this programme were often made in an informal way. When I was a member of the Committee of Public Accounts there was a famous application the record of which was written on the back of a cigarette box by the former Minister, John O'Connell, but over recent years regulations and the guidelines for applications have been considerably tightened. It seems to me that there are aspects of present guidelines, particularly in relation to funding for projects in deprived areas, which we should look at again.

The guidelines, terms and conditions for the new sports capital programme have significantly increased the onus on local bodies to come up with finance from their own resources. Applicant clubs will now have to meet at least 50 per cent of the cost of regional projects and 30 per cent of the cost of local facilities. While section 3.1 of these guidelines states that the highest priority will be given to projects in disadvantaged areas, section 2.7 states that those areas must still find at least 20 per cent of the cost of new facilities unless those districts can access EU or other national funding, where the minimal local contribution will still be 10 per cent in the main. In gravely disadvantaged areas, such as those I represent in Dublin North-East, a club might, therefore, have to raise up to £50,000 for a clubhouse or dressing rooms costing perhaps £250,000. In those areas where there is continuing significant long-term unemployment the raising of even £5,000 is a major achievement. Under these guidelines there is a requirement that applications for larger club projects must be accompanied by a costly in-depth feasibility study. There is also provision for technical advice and consultation. Clubs sponsoring projects must have long leases or own their own grounds.

As has been the case throughout most of the lottery's history since 1987, it looks as if disadvantaged areas may be callously ignored. Ironically, many studies have shown that such deprived urban and rural areas are among the biggest supporters of the lottery competitions. When the price of the ticket for the twice weekly lottery draws was increased by 50 per cent from 50p to 75p per panel some months ago, the national lottery trumpeted its contribution to the types of projects in deprived areas to which I refer.

We must remember the nature of social deprivation in areas such as those in the Northside Partnership area which I represent, and which is spread over a number of constituencies, where there is up to 40 per cent unemployment in some parishes despite the Celtic tiger. The net total amount allocated this year for the sports capital programme is £10 million. Some £14.5 million has been allocated but the other £4.5 million was committed for last year. It is a ludicrously small amount. In Dublin North-East alone, there are at least ten significant projects which would greatly enhance the lives and recreation of my constituents in deprived areas. They would also be a great bulwark against crime and anti-social behaviour by young people. Between £2 million and £3 million could easily be spent on Dublin North-East alone. If we were to have a credible national programme and similar sums of money available for Wicklow or Cavan-Monaghan, for example, the national programme should involve at least £50 million.

The Minister, Deputy McDaid, whom I respect greatly, advised me over the past year and a half about what he intended to do. I want him to ask the Minister for Finance, Deputy McCreevy, for more money to reward those wonderful people in so many social, GAA and soccer clubs. These people have given of their spare time and money to keep young kids off the streets and to facilitate senior citizens. I ask that he give them the kind of reward which we should be giving as we head into the millennium year, in which it is expected that the level of growth will be 10 per cent and when the level over the next ten years is expected to be 6 per cent. In that context, he should reinterpret the guidelines on behalf of the people of disadvantaged areas who deserve better consideration.

I thank Deputy Broughan for raising this important matter. I apologise to the House for the unavoidable absence of my colleague, the Minister for Tourism, Sport and Recreation, Deputy McDaid and want to make the following statement on his behalf.

In making Deputy McDaid the first Minister for Sport, the Taoiseach, in his Dáil speech on the appointment of the Government, specifically referred to the role of sport in the fight against social disadvantage. The needs of deprived communities were uppermost in Minister McDaid's mind when he undertook to review the terms of the sports capital programme. He is conscious of the role sport and leisure play in the life of communities or individuals, especially in disadvantaged communities.

The new sports capital programme, which the Minister announced in December last following a comprehensive review of the existing programme, has a clear focus on disadvantaged areas. This programme provides national lottery funding towards the provision of sports and recreational facilities and is the primary vehicle for promoting the development of such facilities in Ireland. The Government has committed over £50 million from the national lottery to the new programme over the next three years to assist in the provision of high quality, well designed sport and recreational facilities throughout the country.

The £50 million being spent by this Government over the next three years compares with £17 million spent over the past three years. This increased spending on sport is mirrored across the board. This Government is spending £39 million per year on sport compared with £13 million per year when the rainbow Government left office in June 1997.

The emphasis on disadvantaged communities is reflected across all areas of sports spending under this Government. This concentration of dramatically increased sports spending in disadvantaged communities contrasts with the untargeted splurge of £9 million on the eve of the last election by the rainbow Government. The needs of disadvantaged communities were not considered then.

Under this Government, special priority is being given to the development of facilities in disadvantaged areas. In terms of developing facili ties, the Minister is aware that a persistent problem in disadvantaged areas is the difficulty many clubs and local groups have in raising local funding to which the Deputy referred. To help address this issue, the maximum percentage of grant-aid available where facilities are located in disadvantaged areas can be as high as 80 per cent in cases of real need, as opposed to 70 per cent in non-disadvantaged areas. Where it is possible for clubs and community organisations in such areas to access other sources of State or EU funding to make up the balance of the overall cost of the project, they will only be required to raise 5 per cent of funding locally – as opposed to 10 per cent in non-disadvantaged areas – if deemed appropriate in the context of projects contributing to overall policy priorities.

The Minister believes that there is a need for local communities to contribute some funding towards the cost of sports facilities for their areas, so that they can identify with the projects in question. He feels strongly that a club or community group is more likely to maintain and get the most out of a facility if it has contributed financially to it rather than having it all paid for by others. A local contribution also provides some assurance that the club or group can generate funds that will enable it to maintain and manage the facility once it is built.

Overall capital commitments outstanding under the programme at the end of 1998 amounted to approximately £16 million. These commitments must be met in 1999 and subsequent years on satisfactory completion of projects, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the programme. In addition, almost 1,900 new applications were received under the programme by last Friday's deadline for receipt of such applications. While the overall amount of funding being sought in these applications has yet to be quantified, the Minister expects it to be very substantial.

The provision of facilities does not in itself, however, ensure increased participation by local communities from disadvantaged areas. Experience to date would suggest that clubs and community groups who operate facilities in their areas need to employ a range of strategies to ensure that local communities have access to facilities, to encourage local people to make use of them and to ensure that they are attracted by what is on offer in the facilities.

The young people's facilities and services fund has been established for the purpose of developing youth facilities, including sport and recreational facilities, and services in disadvantaged areas where a significant drug problem exists or has the potential to develop, with a view to attracting young people in those areas, at risk of becoming involved in drugs, into more healthy and productive pursuits. A sum of £30 million has been provided to this fund and decisions on the allocation of a major portion of this funding are likely to be taken in the very near future.

There are also other initiatives under way aimed at increasing participation in sport and recreation in disadvantaged areas. The most recent of these is based on using the organisational skills and experience of three of our largest national governing bodies of sport. The Department of Tourism, Sport and Recreation has recently agreed a pilot project with the Gaelic Athletic Association for the development of, and increased participation in hurling and football in disadvantaged areas in major urban centres. An amount of £40,000 was paid in 1998 to the GAA towards the development of the project. A proposal from the FAI is also currently under consideration in relation to initiatives for the development of its sport in disadvantaged areas while the IRFU is also contemplating involvement in this initiative specifically designed for governing bodies.

Meanwhile, in conjunction with the Irish Sports Council, consideration is currently being given to piloting further new approaches to increasing participation in sport and recreation at local level. Before finalising proposals, including the designation of any area for possible pilot projects, the Department will be consulting with the appropriate vocational education committees, local authorities and sporting organisations.

Previous administrations talked about social disadvantage. This Government is delivering. There is a Minister with responsibility for sport at the Cabinet table and in 18 months the amount of money spent on sport has been trebled. The new revised sports capital scheme will ensure that these significant extra resources will be targeted to disadvantaged communities.

Taking all these initiatives into account, the Minister for Tourism, Sport and Recreation, Deputy McDaid considers that the needs of people in disadvantaged areas in relation to the provision of sport and recreational facilities are being catered for.

The Dáil adjourned at 11.15 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 18 February 1999.

Barr
Roinn