Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 5 Dec 2000

Vol. 527 No. 3

Adjournment Debate Matters.

I wish to advise the House of the following matters in respect of which notice has been given under Standing Order 21 and the name of the Member in each case: (1) Deputy Deasy – the need to distribute copies of the collection of the Folklore Commission to the various library committees throughout the country; (2) Deputy Shortall – the urgent need for a Government initiative to resolve the ASTI dispute so that the country's secondary school students will not be further denied their right to education; (3) Deputy Stanton – the need to allow secondary students back to school; (4) Deputy Michael P. Kitt – the question of funding for Tuam swimming pool and proposals by Galway County Council; (5) Deputy Fitzgerald – the urgent need to extend the breast cancer screening programme nationwide; (6) Deputy McGuinness – the increasing job losses at Muinebheag, County Carlow, and the urgent need for an action plan involving all State agencies; (7) Deputy Moynihan – the need to discuss the case of a person (details supplied) in relation to school transport to Meelin national school; (8) Deputy Clune – the need to extend the national breast screening programme on a nationwide basis; (9) Deputy Browne (Carlow-Kilkenny)– the closure of Independent Analytical Systems in Bagenalstown, County Carlow; (10) Deputy Coveney – the future of the Blood Transfusion Service in Cork; (11) Deputy Shatter – the need to sanction essential refurbishment works undertaken on existing classrooms in St. Colmcille's primary school, Knocklyon, during the Christmas break and to sanction the provision of additional permanent school classrooms; and (12) Deputy Power – the commitments given by the Royal Bank of Scotland to Ulster Bank Staff.

The matters raised by Deputies Browne (Carlow-Kilkenny), McGuinness, Fitzgerald and Clune have been selected for discussion.

On a point of order, can I ask you, Sir, if it would be in order to draw to the attention of the House the fact that the Taoiseach is now abdicating any responsibility for the conduct of his Ministers? I had tabled a private notice question to the Taoiseach—

Deputy, I am dealing with matters now.

—about the activities of the Minister of State, Deputy Ned O'Keeffe, and I am told this is the business of the Public Offices Commission, not the Taoiseach.

Deputy Dukes, you are out of order. I am moving on now to a request for the adjournment of the Dáil—

Is it the case, Sir, that the Taoiseach is not answerable to this House for the conduct of his Minister?

Deputy Howlin has a question down. Is the Deputy trying to pre-empt what Deputy Howlin has to say?

Has the Taoiseach completely abdicated responsibility for the acts of his Minister of State?

Before coming to the Order of Business—

A Leas-Cheann Comhairle, could you tell me why this House cannot hold the Taoiseach responsible for the actions of a member of his Government?

Deputy Dukes, the Chair is on his feet. I ask you to resume your seat. You are totally out of order. We have moved on to motions under Standing Order 31.

A Leas-Cheann Comhairle, on a point of order, Sir—

Deputy Dukes, I ask you to resume your seat. It is not a point of order.

—is the Taoiseach responsible to this House for the activities of the Government, or is he not? This Taoiseach is doing the same thing that he did with Deputy Fleming about money –"Don't tell me, tell the lawyers".

Deputy Dukes, the Chair is on his feet. Do you wish to leave the House because if you do, the opportunity will be afforded to you?

He is completely abdicating his responsibility.

Barr
Roinn