The problem is that the premise upon which Deputy Higgins pursues his argument is contended by those who are engaged in the military action. The Deputy suggests that this action is illegal and lacks a sufficient mandate but that argument is not accepted by the coalition forces which say they are acting on the basis of existing UN mandates. That is precisely the point. This is an argument that will continue to run. I am sure there will be plenty of interesting academic literature on this point as far as international legal experts and students are concerned in the immediate future and thereafter. What we must concern ourselves with is the reality on the ground as this situation evolves.
I assure the Deputy that the question of humanitarian aid was raised by the Taoiseach with the United States President and with the British Prime Minister. It has been a consistent theme of this Government's approach and it is entirely consistent with our foreign policy traditions.
As regards what we will do for the Iraqi people, their concerns are that the demise of this regime is completed as quickly as possible and that it should be replaced by a democratic, representative and properly constituted government for the people for Iraq where the resources of Iraq can be used for the benefit of Iraq. That is what the people of Iraq want. I will work with others to deal with that.
As I said in my initial reply, I question whether debates in the UN, which by their nature would be divisive, would enhance a more meaningful role for the UN, which we all seek. We must make sure in our political debate, dialogue and discussions at EU, UN and every other level and by way of bilateral contracts that the objective, with which we all agree, is brought about as quickly as possible and that the role of the UN is brought to bear on that situation in as effective and meaningful a way as is possible.