Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 8 May 2003

Vol. 566 No. 2

Adjournment Debate. - Strategic Development Zone.

I thank the Minister for taking this matter today. Yesterday, the Adamstown plan was passed in a cynical, rubber stamp exercise, by the Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Progressive Democrats alliance on South Dublin County Council, aided by some well-meaning but misinformed members of the Labour Party. The vote was meant to be held on 12 May but due to incompetence, or deliberate misinformation by council planners, it was put through yesterday. This took everyone in Lucan by surprise, including some of the local representatives who had clearly been informed otherwise.

The Minister is no doubt aware that Adamstown is the most ambitious project undertaken of its kind in the country. We are talking about a new town the size of Drogheda, adjacent to Lucan, which is the fastest growing town in the country. With a projected population of more than 20,000, the impact of Adamstown needs to be considered carefully or it will create the largest traffic jam this country has ever seen. Its impact will spread into north Kildare and will affect south Meath, Clondalkin, Newcastle, Palmerstown and Blanchardstown. God knows how many towns will be affected if it is not managed carefully.

Lucan is already suffering in terms of a major problem with infrastructure. There is a severe shortage of school places. It has one of the poorest public transport services in any urban area and a chronically congested road network. Added to this the Government has now sanctioned the new town of Adamstown by means of a strategic development zone designation. This has to be grotesque, unprecedented, bizarre and unbelievable.

Residents and community groups in Lucan tried to adopt a positive outlook. They did not say "No" to housing or "Not in our backyard". They just asked that it be delivered correctly. The Government, and Fine Gael and Labour to their shame, have delivered it but delivered it wrongly. It is interesting that yesterday when 50 motions were tabled to try to make Adamstown sustainable not one amending motion with which the manager disagreed was passed. Some 25 of the most far-reaching motions tabled by my Green Party colleague, Councillor Fintan McCarthy, were grouped into one debate.

There were no guarantees in this debate regarding operational capacity for roads, rail or schools. We may have a railway station but can Iarnród Éireann guarantee capacity down the line? We may have a QBC but will Dublin Bus provide the buses? We may have school buildings but will the Department of Education and Science sanction them? We may have a road leaving Adamstown, incidentally going down the so-called outer ring road through a residential area of Lucan, a folly which I will not discuss now, but this road goes straight onto the N4, yet there are no guarantees regarding the widening of the N4.

There have been no guarantees either about the widening of the M50, the provision of a much needed interchange at the M50 to allow free-flowing traffic or an overpass at Palmerstown which would have a knock-on effect. There have been no guarantees of funding for any of these. Will the Government give this funding?

The checks and balances in the Adamstown plan, which is well put together in some ways, are all internal. They do not go an inch beyond its narrow borders. This plan is in line with a plan which was designed, apparently, before the transport framework plan was published. This plan was supposed to be published before the manager's report to give people a chance to make submissions based on its findings. However, the transport usage plan was published afterwards. Were the planners planning in a vacuum?

I am offering the Minister a chance to redeem himself this evening after his interview with The Irish Times in which he hummed and hawed about taking direct action. Groups such as LTQL, the Finnstown input group etc. have acknowledged the detail that goes into the internal workings of the plan. However, Adamstown will fail unless the required infrastructure is provided. I call on the Minister to use his powers to suspend or freeze Adamstown's designation as an SDZ and to put a halt to any other processes until such time as the planning legislation is strengthened considerably or until he can give a copperfastened guarantee that the money will be provided to Iarnród Éireann for railway carriages for Adamstown, fore tracking and electrification work, schools and the M50. The Minister's colleague, Deputy Curran, has said this will be provided, but I have no reason to believe him given that he betrayed people locally previously. The Minister should say whether this is the case.

I ask the Minister to heed these words lest they come back to haunt him in five or ten years when we may have another Ballymun-type structure. We want a sustainable town with the operational capacity in place to ensure it works. The least we need is an environmental impact statement. Ms Patricia McKenna, MEP, has passed the matter on to the EU as an EIS may be needed under EU law.

I ask the Minister to show leadership and to tackle the issue of Adamstown. He must make sure it works or freeze the plan until he has the money to do so.

I thank Deputy Gogarty for raising this important issue. He mentioned my colleague, Deputy Curran, whom I compliment on his involvement in this project. He spoke to me and other Ministers today about the different elements important in the context of this development. Deputy Curran is well up to speed and keeps his colleagues equally informed.

South Dublin County Council yesterday voted to adopt the planning scheme for the Adamstown strategic development zone. Adamstown is an important residential site, with a potential housing yield of 8,000 dwelling units. These will be close to Dublin city, within the metropolitan area, thereby avoiding the generation of urban sprawl or long-distance commuting.

The scheme that the council has adopted sets out clearly how the area will be developed into a new community over the next few years. I am pleased the council followed my suggestion of setting up a steering group comprising local stakeholders, including residents and providers of transport services, to oversee the implementation of the SDZ over its lifetime.

I will outline for the House the reasons Adamstown has been designated by the Government as a strategic development zone. The fundamental goal of Government housing policy since we took office has been to put in place a range of measures that would create the conditions to increase the supply of housing to meet demand. One of the many initiatives taken by the Government to increase supply was the designation of large residential sites as strategic development zones to fast-track them through the planning system.

Three sites were designated by Government order as SDZs for residential development on 19 June 2001. This followed an evaluation by my Department of proposals submitted by the relevant local authorities in conformity with certain criteria. These included not only the numbers of houses that would be delivered, but also the potential for comprehensive planning offered by the nature and scale of the site and the location of lands proximate to existing or proposed public transport corridors. The Adamstown SDZ site, for which a local area plan has already been adopted, delivered on all these points.

Not only will Adamstown deliver 8,000 housing units but the planning scheme also provides for schools, community and child care facilities, shopping and parks, all important components to ensure a high quality living environment. It is also important that the phasing of the development has been carefully thought out so as not to impact adversely on the existing community. The SDZ site will contribute to an improved level of amenities which will benefit the wider area as well as the site itself.

Adamstown is strategically located, adjacent to a rail line, is in close proximity to the outer ring road and is served by two quality bus corridors. I am advised that it is intended to enhance this infrastructure. Development of new bus services in the greater Dublin area is currently under consideration in the context of the statement made by my colleague, the Minister for Transport, to the public transport partnership forum. Bus priority will be considered by the quality bus network office which is now responsible for the delivery of on-street bus priority measures as set out in the DTO's strategy document Platform for Change. On the rail side, planned upgrading of the Kildare line will significantly increase passenger capacity and benefit commuters to and from Adamstown. larnród Éireann is in discussion with the developers of Adamstown about the provision of a railway station at the site. I understand that the developers have agreed in principle to fund the cost of the station.

The Deputy has asked for the Adamstown designation to be suspended. Under Part 9 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as Minister for the Environment and Local Government, I have no powers to suspend the operation of the designation. I remind the Deputy that the Oireachtas passed the relevant provisions of the Planning and Development Act 2000 without division and without opposition from the Green Party. The designation and implementation of SDZs has been clearly contemplated by the Oireachtas and it is not now consistent for the Deputy to seek to suspend it. I urge now that parties get behind the implementation of the SDZ for the good of the community that will be created there.

The Dáil adjourned at 5.30 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 13 May 2003.

Barr
Roinn