Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 29 May 2003

Vol. 567 No. 7

Written Answers. - Overseas Missions.

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

13 Mr. J. O'Keeffe asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on whether there is a case for allowing the Defence Forces to participate in EU-led operations approved, if not specifically authorised by, the UN Security Council. [14776/03]

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

18 Mr. J. O'Keeffe asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs in view of the fact that UN reliance on organisations such as the EU is likely to increase rather than diminish, his views on the implications of the current position arising when a contingent from the Army is requested to serve overseas in an operation which is approved or supported, but not necessarily established by the UN, and on the way in which to overcome the problems. [14777/03]

Mary Upton

Ceist:

46 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if there have been or are proposed to be changes in the procedures for Irish participation in international peacekeeping forces in circumstances where such participation is in bodies that were not established by the UN; the legislative changes the Government may be considering to such procedures; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14775/03]

Joan Burton

Ceist:

90 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if the triple lock on Ireland's participation in international peacekeeping operations remains Government policy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14743/03]

Trevor Sargent

Ceist:

101 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he envisages policy changes being made in regard to the necessity of UN mandates for Irish troops serving abroad; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14947/03]

Gay Mitchell

Ceist:

136 Mr. G. Mitchell asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if, especially in view of the inability of Ireland to take part in peacekeeping operations in Macedonia, he considers that the triple lock policy is no longer a viable policy in matters of peace keeping or peace enforcing; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14986/03]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 13, 18, 46, 90, 101 and 136 together.

The so-called "triple lock" on Ireland's participation in overseas operations, including those carried out under the European security and defence policy, was set out in the National Declaration made at Seville in June 2002. This declaration made clear that Ireland would participate only in such operations that received the "authorisation" of the UN Security Council or General Assembly. This means that the Government will not consider Ireland's participation in an operation, unless that operation has been officially authorised by the UN.

The Government has not given any consideration to modifying this triple lock on Ireland's participation in EU-led missions, nor has any proposal to amend the Defence Acts been brought before the Government.

This general issue arose recently in relation to the possibility of Ireland's participation in an EU-led operation which was sanctioned but not established by the UN Security Council. This was the EU military-monitoring mission in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, known as Operation Concordia.

While UN Security Council Resolution 1371 of September 2001 strongly supports the establishment of a multinational security presence in that country, the Attorney-General advised the Government that this endorsement did not satisfy the requirement that the UN had either established, or authorised the establishment of the EU-led force. In the circumstances, and given that, under the Defence Acts, the Defence Forces can only serve overseas in an operation "established" by the UN Security Council or the General Assembly, Ireland was not in a position to participate in this force.
In a broader context, there has been a significant rise in n recent years in the number of peacekeeping and peace-enforcement operations carried out by regional organisations orad hoc coalitions, with the sanction or approval of the UN. This is partly due to the considerable increase in the number of peacekeeping operations, but also to the specialised nature of particular operations, the need for rapid deployment, or simply the availability of local resources and expertise.
The provisions of the Defence Acts date from a period in which it was not envisaged that the UN would become increasingly reliant upon regional organisations to provide assistance with such operations. In view of the fact that UN reliance on organisations such as the EU is likely to increase rather than diminish, we will continue to monitor and assess the developing situation. I would emphasise, however, that it will be the Government's priority at all times to ensure public confidence in the arrangements for the deployment of Defence Forces personnel overseas and I believe that this position reflects the will of the majority of the Irish people.
Barr
Roinn