I propose to take Questions Nos. 233 and 234 together.
Batasuna, together with the related organisations Herri Batasuna and Euskal Herritarrok, were proscribed as aliases of the terrorist organisation ETA, following a vote of the Spanish Parliament on 26 August 2002 and a decision of the Spanish Supreme Court on 17 March 2003.
In addition, I understand that there is a separate investigation by Judge Baltasar Garzón into the activities of Batasuna and other organisations related to ETA.
Under the terms of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP, EU member states shall, through police and judicial co-operation in criminal matters within the framework of Title VI of the Treaty on European Union, afford each other the widest possible assistance in preventing and combating terrorist acts. In this context, the EU as a whole decided on 5 June 2003 to add Batasuna, and the related organisations, to the list established by Common Position 2001/931/CFSP.
As I understand the situation, ETA has not abandoned the use of force. Nor have ETA or the political party associated with it, Batasuna, committed themselves to exclusively peaceful and democratic means of pursuing their aims. Regrettably, as recently as 30 May two policemen were killed in a car bomb attack attributed to ETA. There can be no place in our democracies for the use or threat of the use of force. The interest of all the people of the Basque country would be best served by a decision by ETA to desist from violence and, together with their associates in Batasuna, commit themselves exclusively to peaceful and democratic means of pursuing their aims.