Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 17 Jun 2003

Vol. 568 No. 5

Written Answers. - EU Directives.

Pat Rabbitte

Ceist:

124 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for the Environment Heritage and Local Government the number of cases in which the European Commission has initiated legal action or announced that it intends to take legal action, arising from the failure by the Government to implement EU directives for which his Department has responsibility; the steps he is taking to ensure that all of these directives are implemented in full; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16523/03]

There are currently six cases in respect of which the European Commission has initiated legal action, or announced that it intends to take legal action, in areas for which my Department has responsibility.

The first case concerns the Dangerous Substances Directive (1976/464/EEC). This directive has been substantially implemented by the Local Government (Water Pollution) Acts 1977 and 1990 and by related Acts and regulations, that is, the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992 and the Waste Management Act 1996. Water quality standards for phosphorus were made in July 1998 and water quality standards for a range of other dangerous substances were made in January 2001. Monitoring by the EPA indicates that the main threat to water quality in Ireland is eutrophication due to excess inputs of phosphorus and, to a lesser extent, nitrates and that dangerous substances are generally not a problem in Irish waters. It is envisaged that the directive will be further implemented in the context of implementation of the Water Framework Directive (60/2000/EEC).

The second case concerns the Nitrates Directive (1991/676/EEC) and the designation of areas as vulnerable zones and the development of action programmes to protect water quality in these areas. Regulations have recently been made which identify on a statutory basis the whole territory of Ireland as the area to which the action programme will be applied. The detailed provisions of the action programme and related research and monitoring programmes will be developed as a matter of urgency, in consultation with the main farming organisations and other interests, with a view to completion this year.

The third case concerns the adoption of programmes for the protection of designated shellfish in waters in accordance with Article 5 of Council Directive 79/923/EEC. The directive has been fully transposed into Irish law, and action programmes have recently been made by the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources and notified to the Commission. The need for any additional measures is being considered in the Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources.

The fourth case relates to a number of waste issues, including progress in the licensing by the EPA of municipal waste landfills, and the regulatory control of waste activities by local authorities and the EPA. Ireland's defence, which has been submitted, is based in part on the fact that relevant requirements of Council Directive 75/442/EEC have been fully transposed under the Waste Management Act 1996 and subordinate regulations, and that the process of licensing municipal landfills is virtually completed.

The fifth case concerns the stated intention by the Commission to refer Ireland to the European Court of Justice, and seek the application of a daily fire, in order to enforce a previous judgment of the court issued in September 1999 in relation to Council Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, particularly in relation to peat extraction. Environmental impact assessment and planning regulations of December 2001 have addressed the legal implications of the ECJ ruling. My Department announced proposals for the protection of over 100 raised bogs on 18 December 2002. The Commission press release also acknowledged that this was an important step towards making Ireland's new system of protection fully operational. Public consultation on the designations is well advanced.
The sixth case refers to the Zoos Directive 1999/22/EC which concerns the keeping of wild animals in zoos. The European Commission announced in a press release of 8 April 2003 that Ireland was to be referred to the European Court of Justice for failing to meet the deadline for transposing the directive into national law. My Department is proceeding to do so by way of regulations under existing primary legislation – the European Communities Act 1972. Relevant consultations with existing operators of zoos as defined in Article 2 of the directive, as well as with the relevant State agencies and interest groups, have largely been concluded and the new regulations will be made this year and followed up immediately with the new licensing regime. Given the relatively low number of zoo operators in this State, my Department is confident that all zoos will be licensed soon thereafter.
Barr
Roinn