Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 1 Jul 2004

Vol. 588 No. 4

Adjournment Debate.

Vandalism of School Property.

I thank the Leas-Cheann Comhairle and his office for permitting me to raise the urgent matter of the vandalism at St. Anne's primary school at Fettercairn in my constituency where local parents and teachers fear for the scale of damage that may be caused to the school over the summer months if it is not secured against the depredations of local youths.

Damage costing €32,000 has already been incurred in the year so far and the school has been broken into on three separate occasions even since a public meeting to address the issue was held on 21 June. Valuable school property is at risk and the capacity of local gardaí to protect the school is very limited. Windows and doors have been broken, rooms trashed, classrooms flooded and there has been damage to the inadequate perimeter fencing. For whatever reason, the school has become the target of a small number of local youths who are out of control.

The campus also accommodates an Obair office, two community pre-schools, one VEC office for adult education and a computer room. A report prepared by the local Garda has led to a proposal put to the Department of Education and Science for the installation of steel shuttering on the inside of windows at a cost of €80,000.

Unfortunately, the Minister, Deputy Noel Dempsey, responded to me on 25 June stating, "As the funding available under the 2004 summer works scheme has now been allocated, it is not possible to consider this application in the current year." Teachers and parents fear that this leaves the school very vulnerable. Given the three break-ins since 21 June, the likelihood is that significant damage will be done to the school in the interim. Accordingly, I am pleading with the Minister of State to authorise the works recommended by the board of management.

I accept that this phenomenon of anti-social activity is a complex one and that there is a role for other agencies, especially the Garda Síochána. However, the failure of this Government over seven years to implement the 1997 decision to afford divisional status to Tallaght Garda station, which would have brought additional manpower, vehicles and extra resources, means that Fettercairn cannot be adequately policed.

The destruction of classrooms is regrettably a phenomenon not restricted to Fettercairn. For example, Scoil Santáin in my constituency has endured similar destruction while awaiting refurbishment. A roof has been repeatedly damaged, windows kicked in, a boiler damaged and most recently, an electric cable ripped down and recklessly left lying around as a hazard to schoolchildren. Such wanton destruction is costing the taxpayer a lot of money. These schools must be secured through adequate perimeter fencing, shuttered windows and, where feasible, contract security to be hired in for the most critical hours. Where, as in the case of Scoil Santáin, refurbishment has been approved in principle, it should be authorised to be carried out without further delay.

I sincerely hope the Minister of State will not reiterate the sentiments in the letter sent to me last week. Parents and teachers are generally fearful that serious damage costing tens of thousands of euro will be the result if the school is not secured. It gives an indication of how grave the situation is that neither the teachers nor the parents think the employment of a local man in some kind of community employment scheme to provide security is acceptable. They believe he would be at risk from those local youths.

I suggest it would be possible for the Department to authorise the contracting in for the critical hours of a contract security service. Otherwise, the cost of the damage which will ultimately be charged to the taxpayer, will greatly exceed what is proposed by the school principal in a submission to the Department. I ask the Minister of State to give us some hope this evening.

I thank the Deputy for raising the matter as it affords me an opportunity to outline to the House the position regarding the severe difficulties the school community of St. Anne's primary school in Fettercairn is experiencing as a result of wanton vandalism.

The Minister for Education and Science is fully aware of the circumstances at St. Anne's primary school in Fettercairn, Tallaght, following representations he received from his colleagues, Deputies O'Connor and Conor Lenihan. He can well appreciate the concerns of the school community in question at the wanton vandalism of school property. There can be no place in a civilised society for the wanton destruction of property. It is of the utmost importance that the perpetrators of such destruction are apprehended and face the full rigours of the law.

The normal procedure is for management authorities to report the matter to the local Garda, which is best placed to provide practical advice and support to the school authorities and to make recommendations as to how best to mitigate the potential risk to the school.

They have done that.

I am aware of that. It is the understanding of the Department that the Garda Síochána in Tallaght has a crime prevention officer on the staff who works with the management authorities in this matter. If the Garda recommends equipment which cannot be procured from normal funding sources, an application for contingency funding can be made to the school building section of the Department.

The problems at St. Anne's must be resolved and advice from the Garda on all security issues presenting at the campus will be considered in the Department. It is open to the school's management authorities to apply under the 2005 summer works scheme, details of which will be announced later this year, for funding to implement any costly measures the Garda may recommend to address long-term security measures which may be required at the school.

The damage will be done by then. The Garda has already made its report.

Has it been furnished to the school principal?

Health Board Services.

Thank you, a Leas-Cheann Comhairle, for allowing me to raise this important matter, namely, the orthodontic service in the Mid-Western Health Board, in particular the recent report on the service submitted to a meeting of the health board on 4 June 2004. The orthodontic service in the mid-west region has been in difficulty for some time, while the orthodontic service generally, which has been discussed on numerous occasions by the Joint Committee on Health and Children, is a disgrace and a scandal as a result of developments since 1999. Prior to that date, an excellent service had been developing but was destroyed by politicking in the dental community.

In a report by Dr. David Spary, consultant orthodontist at the Burton Hospitals NHS Trust, Burton-on-Trent, the orthodontic service in the mid-west region was described as being of an excellent standard until 1999. Since then, access to the service has declined due to staff retention difficulties and patients are experiencing long delays for assessment and treatment. The report recommends a range of measures needed to address this, including a revised grading system, the restoration of the training system linked to the dental hospital and the appointment of another specialist post. The Mid-Western Health Board sought a meeting with the Department of Health and Children to discuss the report and I ask the Minister of State to clarify whether it will take place.

Mr. Ted McNamara, the orthodontic consultant in the mid-west region, set up a treatment facility in 1985. Non-consultant grade dentists were appointed and trained to carry out orthodontic procedures. Three dentists completed higher specialist training leading to a higher qualification in orthodontics in the department. Following an application to the specialist advisory committee, SAC, in orthodontics of the Royal College of Surgeons in England, the department was visited in 1987 and the post was passed as suitable for training.

Dr. Spary stated he had good reason to conclude that the quality of treatment provided during the period prior to 1999 was excellent. He noted that he had seen a large number of study casts taken during this period of patients who had treatment within the department. In addition, one trainee was awarded the gold medal by the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh, and her cases were published in the British Journal of Orthodontics. The award of this medal, according to Dr. Spary, reflects highly not only upon the trainee in question but also on the standard of teaching she received. He also had an opportunity to discuss the situation with the president of the Irish Dental Association, who described the work done in the department during that time as a ‘blue ribbon service'. Dr. Spary also notes that he had an opportunity to discuss the service with the general manager of the acute hospital services who confirmed that no complaints were made about the service at that time.

In 1999, the Department of Health and Children stopped training orthodontic specialists in the mid-west and did not replace the service. Since then, waiting lists in the region have increased. A dispute has arisen concerning who should be on the waiting list. The Department has stated that people should not be on a waiting list if no service is available to treat them. It is a disgrace that people in need of treatment are being removed from a waiting list for this reason.

The continuation of orthodontic services at a level equivalent to that in 1998 is being prevented by a reduction in the number of personnel working in the orthodontic department in Limerick. This appears to have been caused by a withdrawal of approval of training posts, which in turn makes it much less attractive for dentists to work in the department because they have no chance of receiving training to the level of master of orthodontics. The position may, however, have been improved recently by recognition of the grade of orthodontic specialist.

There is no doubt that the model for the provision of orthodontic treatment established in Limerick was highly successful. It produced a high number of well trained specialists and a good quality training programme for some trainees who progressed to achieve a registrable qualification. It may have been perceived as a problem by the SAC that clinics were being filled with unqualified, poorly trained personnel. Dr. Spary is convinced, however, that this is not the case.

Dr. Ian Dowling stated that the national orthodontic service is in crisis. This crisis has been created by the incompetence and dishonesty of the Department of Health and Children and the greed of the dental health schools in Cork and Dublin. In March, the Joint Committee on Health and Children invited the Minister for Health and Children to discuss the orthodontic service, specifically the recommendations of the previous joint committee on orthodontics. The Minister has refused to meet the joint committee.

I am replying on behalf the Minister for Health and Children, Deputy Martin. The provision of orthodontic treatment to eligible persons in the Mid-Western Health Board is the statutory responsibility of that board in the first instance. The Minister is aware of the waiting list for orthodontic treatment in the Mid-Western Health Board. He notes that some improvements have been made in the service. For example, between December 2001 and March 2004, the assessment and treatment waiting lists in the board have been reduced by 999 and 404, respectively.

The Department and the Mid-Western Health Board have worked hard to get more children into orthodontic treatment and their efforts have been rewarded. In December 2001, the chief executive officer of the Mid-Western Health Board informed the Department that 1,593 children were receiving treatment in the board. At the end of March 2004, the chief executive officer informed my Department that 1,827 children were receiving treatment. This means an additional 234 children are obtaining treatment in the board's orthodontic service.

The Minister has taken a range of measures to improve the orthodontic services both nationally and in the Mid-Western Health Board. The grade of specialist in orthodontics has been created in the health board orthodontic service. The creation of this new grade will attract orthodontists to work in the health service on a long-term basis.

In 2003, the Department and the health boards funded 13 dentists from various health boards for specialist in orthodontics qualifications at training programmes here and at three separate universities in the United Kingdom. These 13 trainees for the public orthodontic service are additional to the six dentists who commenced training in 2001. There is, therefore, an aggregate of 19 dentists in specialist training for orthodontics.

Furthermore, the commitment of the Department to training development is manifested in the funding provided to both the training of specialist clinical staff and the recruitment of a professor in orthodontics for the Cork Dental School. This appointment at the school will facilitate the development of an approved training programme leading to specialist qualification in orthodontics. The chief executive officer of the Southern Health Board has reported that the professor commenced duty on 1 December 2003. In recognition of the importance of this post at Cork Dental School the Department has given approval in principle to a proposal from the school to further substantially improve the training facilities there for orthodontics. This project should see the construction of a large orthodontic unit and support facilities and will ultimately support an enhanced teaching and treatment service to the wider region under the leadership of the professor of orthodontics.

If the excellent regime in place in 1999 had been left alone, we would not have a waiting list.

Deputy Neville is out of order.

The Deputy will have heard the statistics on the waiting lists in the health board.

We know what has happened to Triona McNamara since 1999.

Orthodontic initiative funding of €4.698 million was provided to the health boards in 2001. This has enabled health boards to recruit additional staff, engage the services of private specialist orthodontic practitioners to treat patients and build additional orthodontic facilities. Under this initiative, the Mid-Western Health Board received an additional €513,000 in funding.

In June 2002, my Department provided additional funding of €5 million from the national treatment purchase fund to health boards specifically for the provision of orthodontic treatment.

Would the Minister of State like to put money on that?

The treatment purchase fund provides the best of value for money.

Does the Minister of State maintain that?

Yes. I wish Oppositions Members would wake up, realise how the health service can be reformed and stop chasing the last trolley.

I am referring specifically to orthodontics.

The Deputy is out of order.

This funding is enabling boards to provide both additional sessions for existing staff and purchase treatment from private specialist orthodontic practitioners. The Mid-Western Health Board was allocated an additional €451,000 from this fund for the treatment of cases in this way.

A total of 1,827 patients were obtaining treatment in the board at the end of March 2004. Orthodontics is unique in that the treatment period for a child is between 18 and 24 months, and each year thousands of children with varying needs are placed on assessment waiting lists. This presents challenges for services delivery and will continue to do so.

However, the Minister's aim is to continue to make progress and to develop a high quality, reliable and sustainable service in the Mid-Western Health Board and all the other boards for children and their parents.

Will the Minister of State respond to the committee? He will have been promoted before that happens.

Water and Sewerage Schemes.

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for giving me the opportunity to raise this issue. We are all aware of the difficulties encountered by people as they try to secure planning permission to build houses in rural villages and towns and we are all conscious of raw sewage entering our rivers and seas. It is in our interest that our seas are protected for future generations.

The Quilty, Scarriff and Feakle sewerage schemes have been grouped and are located in sensitive areas in County Clare. Quilty, which includes the village of Mullagh, is an excellent fishing and tourist spot on the Atlantic coastline. Many tourists visit each year. The Minister of State will be familiar with the area as he has many relations there. It is a shame that both local people and tourists must deal with the sight and smell of raw sewage.

The Quilty scheme has been approved for some time and the only reason it is being delayed is Clare County Council is awaiting a foreshore licence which was applied for on 18 November 2003. It is unfortunate that the application is also delaying the Scarriff and Feakle schemes. These two schemes were in the part A process for a considerable time but were approved by the county council last December. An application relating to the schemes is before the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and approval is being sought to go to tender.

The current situation regarding the Scarriff scheme, which includes the village of Tuamgraney, is unacceptable. The present facility is located at Druidsboro in Scarriff, adjacent to the docks, which is the site of construction works for the upgrade and extension of the marina by Waterways Ireland Limited which has responsibility for inland waterways. It is proposed that the treatment effluent will be discharged into the Scarriff river.

The schemes, when implemented, will remove septic tanks and private waste water treatment systems from a substantial number of houses and this will have a significant environmental benefit for all three towns. Many applications for schemes are being held up by the planning process. Even where lands are zoned for the purpose, they cannot be built on because planners regard the applications as premature. A sewerage scheme was undertaken at Sixmilebridge some time ago and it has benefited the town greatly. Significant building is taking place, which is a boost to the local economy.

Unfortunately, in recent times the number of schemes being undertaken has slowed. It is unacceptable that, because a foreshore licence is awaited for the Quilty scheme, the other schemes are also delayed. I am delighted that my colleagues from Clare, Senators Daly and Dooley, are present to give me support on this issue.

The delay in these schemes is, in turn, delaying other schemes, particularly the Labasheeda, Cooraclare and Carrigaholt group scheme. I hope the Minister of State will respond regarding the foreshore licence, which is creating the problem, and that the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government will fast-track the schemes. Perhaps the Minister of State will have good news given that his colleagues are present.

I am replying on behalf of the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government.

I thank the Deputy for raising this issue. I note the substantial interest of Senators Daly and Dooley in it. I will first outline the major investment being made by my colleague, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, in improving water services infrastructure throughout the country and, particularly in Clare, under the national development plan. Last May, the Minister published the water services investment programme 2004 — 2006, which comprises 869 schemes at different stages of development, with a total investment of €5 billion. Almost 150 new projects worth €556 million have been added to the programme since last year. It is the most significant milestone yet in the push to bring our water services infrastructure up to world standard.

The total allocated to County Clare under the latest phase of the programme is €194 million, a substantial investment that extends to 44 individual schemes. It includes major sewerage projects for Ennis-Clarecastle as well as Ballyvaughan, Corofin, Doolin, Kilkee, Kilrush, Carrigaholt, Labasheeda, Cooraclare, Shannon town, Broadford, Ennistymon, Liscannor, Miltown Malbay and Spanish Point. It also includes major water supply schemes for Ennis, Newmarket-on-Fergus and the Lisdoonvarna extension to Ballyvaughan and Fanore and the west Clare regional water supply scheme.

Funding has also been provided under the serviced land initiative to bring additional residential sites on stream as rapidly as possible to meet housing needs at a number of locations throughout the county, including Gillogue, Clarecastle, Clonlara and Tulla. A large number of towns and villages in Clare are benefiting from the drive to bring our water and sewerage infrastructure up to a modern standard.

With regard to the Quilty, Scarriff and Feakle schemes, they are included in the investment programme and have been approved to go to construction. Tender documents for the schemes, which are being advanced as a grouped design-build-operate project, are awaited in the Department.

The council says the Department is holding up the schemes.

Once these are received from Clare County Council and approved, the council will be able to invite tenders for the schemes. Our function in Government is to provide funding for the schemes and that has been done. I assure the Deputy I have listened carefully to what he has said and I will advise the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government to take account of the issues raised by him. I will also ensure the examination of the tender documents takes place as quickly as possible, once they are received in the Department to advance these schemes.

Industrial Accidents.

My matter relates to a fire in an empty Shell depot at Dublin Port last Sunday. The fire lasted three hours and the Dublin fire brigade had to use specialist equipment to quench it. Local people heard an explosion prior to the fire. The depot had been used to store tar and bitumen for road surfacing. It is located near oil and petrol storage tanks and the Irish Ferries dock. It is fortunate the fire took place when the dock was quiet, as normally many people and cars travel to and from the ferries while a small number of people work in the vicinity.

However, extensive damage was caused and a pall of thick, black, acrid smoke stretched across Dublin Bay and the docklands. This is a serious matter. Irish Shell indicated it would conduct an investigation, but that is not adequate. We must have an independent, external body conducting the investigation. We cannot simply have the people in whose depot the fire started being wholly responsible for the investigation.

That is why I put down this motion — to call on the Minister to ensure that an investigation is conducted by him or under his auspices. Then we can be sure of finding out the cause of and threat from the fire in order to put the proper health and security provisions in place to prevent such a fire happening again. We can then be sure that those working, travelling or living in the area can be safe. The residential areas of Dublin are encroaching upon the port area and while there may be nobody living in the port there are people living near it. Large numbers of people also work in and travel through the port.

There is a huge amount of petrol and oil, very inflammable fuel, stored in the docks and if a fire catches in one empty depot and travels to one of those massive tanks of fuel a huge disaster could take place. Such a disaster would not just threaten the local environment but the livelihoods of many people in the area and the city of Dublin. We have a potentially serious problem on our doorstep and we need to be cognisant of this warning, which shows what might happen if there were a serious explosion or fire here.

What steps does the Minister intend to take to ensure there is a proper, full, thorough, comprehensive and independent investigation into this? What steps will he take to ensure something like this does not happen again?

I thank Deputy Costello for raising this matter. I am replying on behalf of my colleague, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. Like Deputy Costello and other citizens of Dublin I was very concerned by the incident. I express my appreciation of the professional and efficient response of Dublin Fire Brigade to this incident, which ensured that the fire came under control quickly and the possibility of a major incident was averted. That is a tremendous tribute to the professionalism of the fire service in Dublin.

The initial call to the fire brigade was received at 15.19 and the brigade immediately mobilised two water tenders, one foam tender, one turntable ladder, an ambulance and a district officer. An additional two water tenders were mobilised, with a further water tender and the foam support unit being mobilised shortly afterwards. The first fire brigade appliance arrived at the incident at 15.23, within four minutes, and on arrival found they were facing an oil-bitumen fire extending approximately 1,000 m2 and engulfing three bitumen tanks. The fire produced large amounts of black smoke with flames about 60 feet high.

Dublin Fire Brigade initiated the pre-determined response for this type of incident, which involved setting up water and foam monitors. With these monitors in place the foam attack commenced and the fire was quickly contained and brought under control. Damping down and cooling operations continued until the area was made safe. Dublin Fire Brigade personnel have been trained to deal with this type of incident in a safe manner and at no time during the incident were any of the fire fighters in danger. There was no injury to anyone at the fire ground nor at any stage was there a danger to the public. That is a tremendous tribute to the professionalism and efficiency of the fire service in Dublin.

Dublin City Council, including Dublin Fire Brigade, have regular meetings with Irish Petroleum Importers Association and the Dublin Port Company to review fire safety in Dublin Port and to ensure there are sufficient measures available in terms of procedures, fixed and mobile equipment, and other resources to deal with incidents in the port. The fire brigade, in conjunction with the IPIA and the Dublin Port Company, carries out detailed pre-planning for foreseeable incidents as well as regular exercises. The incident in question will be discussed and debriefed in the near future between the parties, and any lessons learned, whether in terms of a need for improved procedures, equipment, or any other matter, will be promptly acted upon. I reassure the Deputy that those procedures are already in place.

Regarding health and safety requirements at Dublin Port, it is a matter for the companies involved, in the first instance, as well as the Dublin Port Authority as licensing authority, to ensure that all health and safety requirements are in place and the Minister of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government has no strict statutory function in the matter.

However, the Health and Safety Authority, Shell and the Dublin Port Authority initiated a joint investigation into the incident on the day it occurred, which is currently ongoing. I can confirm that international consultants have also been brought into the investigation at the company's expense. Following this investigation and the debriefing with the fire brigade, the co-operation of all concerned will be sought to consider the lessons learnt from this incident and to endeavour to ensure, as far as possible, that a similar incident will not occur again.

The Dáil adjourned at 7.30 p.m. until 2.30 p.m on Tuesday, 6 July 2004.
Barr
Roinn