Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 7 Jul 2010

Vol. 715 No. 1

Leaders’ Questions

I rise today to speak for those who have no voice for themselves. Last week I raised with the Taoiseach the consequence of Government action in not controlling costs. We now have a situation in which thousands of people — members of families — are forced today to march on this House to protest at the cutting of respite care for the disabled and mentally challenged. Last week the Taoiseach defended his decision. I have considered his reply and I fundamentally reject it.

Last year the National Federation of Voluntary Bodies, an association of organisations providing health care services in the voluntary sector, sat down with the Health Service Executive. It faced up to its responsibility in this time of national crisis and agreed on a range of cuts amounting to €15 million, plus all the reductions in public sector pay and so on. The federation said to its constituent members around the country that because this was a time of national crisis, it was prepared to face up to its responsibility and take its fair share of cuts. Then, because the HSE was unable to control its costs in other areas in which there were overruns, it came back and took another €11 million from the voluntary sector. This is what is causing the problem. It is causing thousands of families to march today for their loved ones who have no voice and cannot speak for themselves.

The Taoiseach defended this position last week. The report of the special group on public service numbers and expenditure programmes outlines so many ways in which the Government could have taken different decisions, thus ensuring that the services provided to those with disabilities, particularly respite care, could continue. For example, the report points out a possible saving of €154 million through rationalisation of State agencies. In the Vote of the Department of Health and Children alone, savings of €1.2 billion could have been made by choosing from a menu of options. However, the Government has allowed a situation to develop in which an extra €11 million has been savagely cut from these organisations by the HSE, with the consequence——

Do we have a question, Deputy?

——that people who look after adults with a mental age of three or four are now under serious pressure. The House goes off tomorrow for the summer recess, leaving this absolute mess behind. In the interest of the thousands of families involved in this on a 24-hour basis, is the Taoiseach prepared to take executive action on this and to put a stop to the madness? Is he prepared to allow the voluntary organisations, which are prepared to take their share of responsibility, to be able to continue to provide services in Caherdavin, Swinford, Cabra and other places around the country where closures are having to take place? Will he put a stop to this madness today?

Deputies

Hear, hear.

There is no such decision.

There is. Already €2.5 million has been cut and they are looking for another €2 million. There is such a decision.

The Taoiseach, without interruption.

There is such a decision.

There is no such decision.

Deputy McCormack woke up very cranky this morning.

I want to make it very clear. It is not acceptable to me or the Government that respite services will be cut and as far as I am concerned, that will not happen.

It has happened in Limerick already.

The Minister, Deputy Mary Harney, and the Minister of State, Deputy John Moloney, are meeting the Brothers of Charity today. I have indicated that there are other savings to be found in terms of management, layers of management, HR systems and purchasing and procurement. There is no such decision and this is not a time to scare people who are vulnerable. There are 25,000 people in receipt of services——

It is the Taoiseach's actions that have scared people.

The Taoiseach, without interruption please.

The Government has increased spending in this area by 400% and I am proud of what we have done in this area. I was a sponsor of that work myself when I was Minister of Health and Minister for Finance. I remind Deputy Kenny that he was a member of a Government that would not even provide €1 million for emergency services for people. That is his record.

Shame on the Taoiseach.

I assure Deputy Kenny that the discussions that are taking place will ensure that those people will not be affected, and I will not take any nonsense from the Deputy on that.

The Taoiseach should be ashamed of himself.

(Interruptions).

Can we have Deputy Kenny, without interruption? I call on Deputy McCormack to allow his party leader speak.

The first time I asked the Taoiseach a question on Leader's Questions, I asked about a woman in hospital. The Taoiseach's response was that it was too facile to raise such a case. I reject the charge the Taoiseach has made today. Shame on him and his Government for allowing what is happening to happen. The Taoiseach has said that no such decision has been made. If not, why are thousands of people marching to the House today? I will tell him why. This is their cry for help. Who speaks for these people? The Taoiseach certainly does not these days.

Deputy Kenny does not anyway.

The Taoiseach has chosen to increase the entertainment budget in Departments, which is up by 66% this year or €1.2 million. This money is being spent for entertainment and clinking of glasses and €289,000 of it is being spent in the Taoiseach's Department. The travel budget for Departments is up by €2.4 million this year. Would that money not provide these services and allow these places remain open? The Taoiseach has chosen not to make any redundancies in the HSE corporate body, despite the fact that the chief executive told my party there were at least 2,500 people in the system who did not know what their jobs were or know where they fitted into the system, but yet they had jobs for life. The Taoiseach has chosen not to implement any of the rationalisation options mentioned by McCarthy, which would save €150 million. He has chosen not to do that, but has allowed another soft touch, and allowed the HSE savage the budget for these voluntary organisations.

I reject what the Taoiseach is saying here. It is fine for him to talk about governments of 13, 15 or 20 years ago. When the Government of 1994-1997 handed over the economy, it was in surplus for the first time in 27 years. It now looks as if we will have to sort it out again. The Taoiseach has come in here time after time and said he will always accept responsibility for his actions and that he stands over all his decisions. Yes, he does that, but he does not accept their consequences. He does not understand or seem to understand——

——what is happening in thousands of households around this country. He may well smile about it.

I am not smiling.

The Taoiseach may say it is not happening, but he should go and ask the sisters, the Daughters of Charity and the Brothers of Charity and those who are providing voluntary services. These organisations faced up to their responsibility. They agreed to take cuts across the board, including pay cuts, and to do the same work for less. However, because the Government has not been able to either govern or manage the sector, the HSE, with its overruns in other sections, has imposed these extra cutbacks on the voluntary sector that provides the best service and value for money of any department under the HSE. The Taoiseach's response last week and this week is indicative of a Taoiseach and Government who have lost compassion and do not understand the difficulties, stress and pressure these people now face. The Taoiseach will go down in history as the one who presided over the failure to listen to the call of these people on the Government to help them. They are crying out for help.

Can the Deputy please put his question?

The Taoiseach is going down the wrong road. There are other options he could have chosen. He will go away for the summer and leave this 24-hour a day situation for thousands of families in his wake. Shame on him and his Government.

I would rather put the facts than get involved in rhetoric with the Deputy. He should just explain his record in this area. With regard to our record, I am making it clear——

(Interruptions).

The Taoiseach, without interruption please.

I wish to make the point again that no decision has been made.

It is already done.

The Deputy made two assertions that decisions have been made to cut services. That is not the case.

On a point of information, the respite centre in Limerick has been closed for the past three weeks.

We cannot discuss this matter. The Deputy should resume her seat.

Discussions are taking place today and tomorrow——

The Taoiseach should go down to Limerick and see the place that has been closed.

On a point of information, the Taoiseach is misleading the House.

We must proceed on the basis that the person in possession be allowed speak. The same protection will be extended to the Deputy. I ask Deputy McCormack to resume his seat. One speaker at a time.

I want to make it clear to Deputy Kenny that discussions are taking place today and tomorrow with Ministers and the providers of these services to find the efficiencies and savings that can be found without affecting front line services in the way that has been suggested. Officials from the HSE stated on radio this morning it is not the intention to affect front line services.

It is already done.

It is already done.

On a point of information——

Deputy McCormack should resume his seat or I will ask him to leave the House.

The Taoiseach is misleading the House.

The Deputy should resume his seat.

He is misleading the House.

The Deputy is tempting fate. He will be out until the autumn if he does not resume his seat.

The decision is already made in Limerick.

The Deputy should resume her seat. Can we have one speaker at a time? The Taoiseach, without interruption.

The centre in Limerick is closed.

What I find appalling is Deputy Kenny's failure to recognise that no such decision has been taken——

——and that discussions are taking place with a view to ensuring that front line services are protected to the greatest extent possible.

The respite centre in Limerick is closed.

Does the Taoiseach not remember meeting the people he met three weeks ago in Limerick?

One speaker at a time. The Taoiseach is in possession.

We, as a Government, have provided 400% more for disability services than when Fine Gael was in office. Our record in this area——

It is not going where it should go.

When I came into office there had been people from Fine Gael and the Labour Party in Government before me who had not been able to provide €1 million for emergency services. My commitment in this area has been proven and there are discussions taking place to ensure that the most vulnerable are not affected and that they find other savings than what may have been suggested by anybody else. That is my statement to the people today. That is the commitment on which I intend to achieve an outcome. With all due respect, despite the Deputy's continued efforts to suggest otherwise, decisions have not been taken in respect of what we want to see taking place as a result of the ongoing discussions.

That is not true. Decisions have been taken and there have been cutbacks of 4%.

There have been cuts in services.

The Taoiseach needs a couple of weeks over the summer to come back to the real world.

The Taoiseach is deceiving the House.

Will Deputy McCormack resume his seat?

The Taoiseach is deceiving the House and I will not let anybody away with that.

The Deputy must resume his seat or I will have to ask him to leave the House.

It is very hard to listen to what is being said.

(Interruptions).

I have called Deputy Gilmore.

The people who will be on the streets of Dublin and other cities today have not dreamed this up, they are not imagining it. There have been cuts: Bawnmore in Limerick is closed; the facility on the Navan Road is closed; and Galway is threatened with closure or cutbacks in the services being provided. Last Friday all the service providers got letters informing them of the cutbacks that are taking place. Parents and carers of people with disabilities are understandably very agitated to the point that they are out on the streets because of their fear that they will lose their respite care which in some cases is one day a week or one weekend in every six. This care enables them, as they would put it themselves, to have a life for those couple of days on which care is provided.

It is fair to say that the people who are on the streets today felt that the days of having to protest, of having to walk on the streets in order to bring attention to the needs and difficulties they have in providing care for members of their family who suffer with disabilities were over. They also thought the days of having to publicise the circumstances, difficulties and personal cases of their loved ones in order to embarrass the Government into providing the necessary care were over. I have two questions for the Taoiseach. First, will he give a guarantee today to every parent and carer of persons with disabilities that they will not lose their respite care? Second, will he give an assurance that there will be no cutbacks in the services provided to people with disabilities?

It is not a question of embarrassment for the Government. This Government has committed itself with money and with resources to extending these services, which were in an appalling state before we came into office. The facts speak for themselves and Deputy Gilmore was a member of that Government. He should not suggest to me that I have any cause for embarrassment in that respect.

The Taoiseach was also in government at that time.

Deputy Howlin was Minister for Health.

The Taoiseach was my Cabinet colleague and Deputy Bertie Ahern was Minister for Finance.

The Taoiseach must be allowed to speak without interruption.

Deputy Quinn gave me the extra €1 million for emergency services. Then there was the era when Fergus Finlay was the second most powerful man in the Government.

That was 1994 to 1997 — does Deputy Howlin remember that?

However, let us leave that aside because we are talking about now.

Yes, let us talk about now.

Exactly. I want to make it clear that this Government has a record of improvement and increase of services for these people, and rightly so, which I will stand over against any predecessor in any office. I am looking at Deputy Quinn in that respect.

Will the Taoiseach answer the question?

At least we did not bankrupt the country.

The second point I want to make is that I have indicated both to the Ministers and to those providing the services that there is a need for them to change whatever arrangements they have — and they have allocated a lot of money — to make sure the people who require the services obtain the services. However, there will have to be changes made in non-front-line services.

There have already been cutbacks of €2.5 million.

What I would expect from responsible Deputies in this House is to indicate that they agree that those non-front line services should be changed so that those who require them get them.

That is ridiculous, service providers are at the pin of their collar.

Whatever is required within those organisations or between those organisations will happen.

The Taoiseach does not have a clue. It is very vexing, a Cheann Comhairle.

That is precisely what is going on at the moment with Ministers meeting those providers of services. Given the moneys that are being provided — of a total of €1.2 billion, €900 million will go to intellectual disability, which is an awful lot more than when Deputy Gilmore was in office, and some €300 million to those with physical and sensory disability — I am confident that those people who require the services on the front line will obtain them. However, it will require change. Perhaps if Deputy Gilmore were to stand up in the House and explain, as I will, that it is those people who are not in the front line who have to take the efficiencies and not those in the front line, then we have a way of going forward in this situation.

Will the Taoiseach abolish the HSE?

Will the HSE withdraw its threat to services?

I asked the Taoiseach two simple questions, neither of which he answered. What he has given me in reply is an Ard-Fheis speech. I have no problem with that; I will engage with him any time and anywhere in political back and forth and we can each give as good as we get. That is not the issue today.

If the Deputy had any policies we could engage with him.

When we rise tomorrow for whatever length of time, whatever number of months the Taoiseach chooses to close down Dáil Éireann, parents and carers of people with disabilities will have to see how they are fixed over that two or three-month period in terms of providing care. They do not want to know what this Government or that Government did or what the Taoiseach did as Minister for Health. They have simple requirements and I want the Taoiseach to answer their questions. First, will they have the respite care or not? Second, are there going to be cuts in the services they are getting?

The Taoiseach can have any arguments he wants with the HSE, and the HSE can have whatever arguments it needs to have with the service providers. Perhaps that should be done. The line Ministers need to take a hands-on approach if that is what must be done. However, the bottom line must be the point of view of persons who have a family member with disabilities for whom they are providing care in the home. Those people are at their wit's end and are stretched and strained trying to provide that care. They want to know whether they will still have their respite care or if it will be taken away from them as has already happened in some cases.

I have asked two questions. Will these people retain their respite care and are there going to be cuts in services? The Taoiseach must do whatever he has to do, with the HSE and with service providers, in order to make it happen. The Taoiseach is Head of Government; it is he who makes things happen.

That is precisely what the meetings today, tomorrow and during the course of this week are about. That is in stark contrast to the suggestion by a Deputy opposite that decisions have already been taken.

Will the Taoiseach give us a commitment?

I am not interested in the politics of it; that is the point. I am making the situation clear to the House, as I am making it clear to the most vulnerable people in our society. I stand over the record of this Government in regard to that. Whatever is required to make sure the most vulnerable people are not affected, that is my requirement and that is what I am saying.

That is exactly what the Government is not doing.

Regardless of what I hear from Deputy McCormack, that is the purpose of the discussions that are ongoing.

I will not take that from the Taoiseach.

Will the Taoiseach answer the questions?

That is the commitment I am giving. It is in stark contrast to when Deputy McCormack's party was in office — when it had the opportunity to act its commitment was nil.

There have been cutbacks of €2.5 million.

Deputy McCormack must resume his seat. Leaders' Questions are concluded.

If the Ceann Comhairle had permitted me to raise this matter on the Adjournment there would be no argument now.

I ask the Deputy to resume his seat, he is disrupting the business of the House. We are moving on to Questions to the Taoiseach.

When will the respite centre in Limerick reopen?

Leaders' Questions are concluded.

Barr
Roinn