Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 20 Apr 2023

Vol. 1036 No. 7

Safe Deposit Boxes and Related Deposits Bill 2022: Second Stage [Private Members]

I move: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

Tá áthas orm gur roghnaíodh an Bille seo le plé agus tá súil agam go nglacfar inniu leis ar an Dara Céim. Bille cuimsitheach atá ann agus tá tairbhe mhór ag baint leis. Bunaíodh an chéad bhanc in Éirinn in 1782 agus ó shin tá daoine ag cur rudaí luachmhara i dtaiscí i mbainc. Tá chuid mhaith taiscí nó boscaí, deirtear liom, ag dul i bhfad siar nach bhfuil a fhios ag éinne cé leo iad. Is iarracht é seo le tabhairt faoi a fháil amach cé leis na boscaí, nó murar l'éinne iad, breathnú cad atá iontu agus iad a choinneáil ar mhaithe leis an Stát.

Céard iad na céimeanna atá sa bpróiseas? An chéad chéim ná clár do na boscaí a réiteach. An dara céim ná na boscaí a cheangail, chomh fada agus is féidir, le daoine gur leo iad. Murar féidir é sin a dhéanamh, cuirfear fógra poiblí amach agus beidh sé sin ar fáil go ceann sé mhí ar lorg úinéirí. Sa gcás gur dteipeann air sin uilig, ansin osclófar na boscaí, féachfar céard atá iontu, cuirfear Ard-Mhúsaem na hÉireann ar an eolas agus déanfaidh seisean cinneadh céard is ceart a dhéanamh leis na taiscí. Déanfaidh sé cinneadh an ceart iad a choinneáil nó gan iad a choinneáil agus más ceart iad a choinneáil don Stát déanfaidh sé cinneadh cén áit ar cheart iad a choinneáil. B'fhéidir go coinneofar iad i nDánlann Náisiúnta na hÉireann, in Ard-Mhúsaem na hÉireann, i Leabharlann Náisiúnta na hÉireann nó in aon áit eile.

Rud amháin go gcaithimid béim a chur air ná gurb é an socrú atá ann ná go n-osclófar na boscaí is sine i dtosach. Céard é "is sine"? Ciallaíonn "is sine" an bosca is faide siar ná fosclaíodh. Má bhí bosca ann agus é á oscailt de réir a chéile agus á dhúnadh agus tuilleadh rudaí gur cuireadh ann, gan bhaint as sin. Is é an dáta deiridh gur fosclaíodh é an dáta a chomhaireann. Tá soláthar sa mBille nach n-osclófar aon bhosca riamh nach bhfuil dúnta le níos lú ná 80 bliain.

Tá mé ag tnúth leis an díospóireacht inniu agus go dtiocfar céim eile leis an bpróiseas atá ar bun le cúig bliana cheana féin.

I am delighted this Bill has been selected for Second Stage debate tonight and I hope that it will be passed on Second Stage and proceed to Committee Stage. It is a comprehensive Bill with six parts and 30 sections and has been five years in gestation.

I thank my colleagues on the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection, Community and Rural Development and the Islands for their interest in this Bill and for their support in the work I was doing. I particularly thank the staff in the Office of Parliamentary Legal Advisers, Ms Niamh McKenna and Mr. Owen Garvey, for all the detailed work they have done in looking at the legislation that exists already and in assisting in drafting this Bill. That said, I take full responsibility for any errors or omissions. I also thank the person, who does not wish to be named, who suggested to me first that this Bill be developed.

It is worthwhile looking exactly at how long the banks, and boxes going into them, have existed. The first bank, the Bank of Ireland, was established by Act of Parliament in 1782. AIB, in its original form, dates back to the founding of the Provincial Bank in 1825. I understand that both have had safekeeping facilities for their clients from the outset and today both institutions and other banks retain all the property that has been abandoned over the years.

It is important to stress repeatedly the property is not the banks' property. They are only safekeepers of the property. The property rightfully belongs to the people who put it there. Obviously, there is nobody alive now who put it there in 1784.

The vast majority of this property was deposited in a sealed state. In other words, people came in with trunks, envelopes, chests, safes and every kind of thing. Some people have a vision of neat rows of boxes with keys in them but in many cases, they brought in, as I said, a sealed receptacle that these deposits are in and, as a result, the contents are unknown.

I understand that for a variety of reasons over the years some boxes had to be opened and that a sample of the items that were found were cash, weapons and other war memorabilia, antiques, paintings, jewellery, title deeds, wills and other papers.

I even heard it suggested that there could be €1 billion worth in the boxes, but this is not about money. This is about artefacts. This is about history. This is about items being made available. That is what we are talking about. It is not so much the monetary value but it has been suggested to me that the monetary value alone would be quite significant.

We have to be very careful - this is what the Bill is about - about how we would do this. The first step is to create a register of property deposits in banks. The second step is to identify the safekeeping of property deposits where the records are sufficient to identify a living or beneficial owner, in other words, the inheritor, starting with the oldest deposits first, and obviously you would expect they would be the hardest ones to link with a living person. Failing that, we would have to advertise with the information available. That information is comprehensive. Effectively, it is everything the banks know. In that way, it is possible to see if an owner comes forward.

In the event of no owner coming forward, the boxes are opened to see what is inside. The director of the National Museum will then examine any unclaimed property and he or she can designate somebody on his or her behalf and decide whether it should be retained by it or by certain other bodies, for example, the National Gallery or the National Library, and put on display. In the event of something going on display and somebody finding out it was theirs, they could claim it back.

The Bill also provides for the transfer of unclaimed funds to the Dormant Accounts Fund. All safe deposits will be recorded in chronological order from the beginning of the banks in the 18th century and no safe deposit held by a bank for less than 80 years will be opened.

When you put a number in a Bill, you have to have justification and a rationale. At the same time, it is always slightly arbitrary. Eighty years was decided to be appropriate as few people under 20 years of age lodge safe deposit boxes in banks; therefore, if 80 years is your cut-off point and you add 20 years to that, the minimum age people would be before they would open them would be 100 years.

The Bill is broken into six parts. Part 1, preliminary and general, includes the purpose of the Bill, the Short Title, interpretation section, expenses and regulations and offences under the Bill. Part 2 provides for the registration, notification and examination of historical property deposits.

This Part imposes certain obligations on institutions with regard to the registration of information relating to deposited property, the identification and notification of depositors of unclaimed property, and the examination of unclaimed property.

Part 3 provides for retention by the State of unclaimed property. This Part provides for the notification of the director of the National Museum that unclaimed property is held by an institution, for the examination of unclaimed property by the director, and for the retention by the State of certain items of property that are of historical, archaeological or artistic importance. This Part also provides for claims for return of property that is retained by the State. In certain circumstances, it also allows for the acquisition by the State of certain property in respect of which such a claim for return is made.

Part 4 provides for the notification of other persons for the performance of statutory functions. This would be the various agencies and so on.

Part 5 provides for the disposal of unclaimed property, the transfer of unclaimed moneys to the Dormant Accounts Fund, and claims for the repayment of unclaimed moneys.

Part 6 provides for miscellaneous matters, including compliance with the provisions of the Bill and the powers of the Central Bank for the purposes of supervising compliance with the provisions of the Bill.

The Schedule to the Bill provides for the phased period during which certain historic, unclaimed property must be examined for the purposes of section 9. That is useful. We have put in inner limits and outer limits. One problem we often find is that things run for much longer than we as legislators had intended they would. I will be interested to get feedback from the House. I hope the fact there are very few of us here is a sign that everybody agrees with this and there is no contest or anybody objecting to any aspect of it. I hope this Bill can now go to Committee Stage, where all of the hard work can be examined in detail and where the Minister will be able to go through it line by line.

Tá mé an-bhuíoch don Aire Stáit as ucht teacht anseo. Tá súil agam go mbeidh dea-scéal aige agus go mbeidh sé ag rá nach mbeidh an Rialtas ag cur ina choinne agus go dtiocfaidh sé ar aghaidh go dtí an chéad Chéim eile agus ansin go mbeidh deis againn dianstaidéar a dhéanamh air seo. Tá go leor buntáistí ag baint leis seo, agus tá mé ag ceapadh go bhfuil go leor den phobal ar mhaith leo fáil amach céard atá sna boscaí taisce seo.

I think an awful lot of people would be curious to find out what people were hiding back in 1784, 1785 or even 1800 or 1825. Members might remember that in the year of the millennium, there was a habit of putting a time capsule in the ground, with many things relevant to the year 2000, and saying that in 50 or 100 years, people could dig these up and find out what the time capsules were holding. In my view, these safe deposit boxes are likely to be an absolutely fascinating time capsule into a world we do not inhabit but which was the real world for the people who lived at that time. I recommend this Bill to the House and hope the Minister of State will be equally positive.

Well done to an Teachta Ó Cuív on very interesting legislation. It is certainly one of the most interesting things I have come across in the short time I have been a Member of the House.

I thank Deputy Ó Cuív for bringing forward this Private Member's Bill entitled the Safe Deposit Boxes and Related Deposits Bill 2022. I am pleased to inform the House that the Government is not opposing the Bill. It is a detailed Bill which covers a wide-ranging and complex area. In the first instance, it is important to understand what it sets out to achieve.

Part 2 seeks to enable the establishment of a register of property deposited in safe deposit boxes in relevant financial institutions, which would mainly be the commercial banks. This includes, for example, the name and contact details of the depositor, the date on which the property concerned was deposited with the institution, and the date on which the property was last accessed by or on behalf of the depositor. The proposed register would also detail information relating to the provisions outlined in the Bill itself, such as details relating to the examination of unclaimed property by relevant institutions and the possible retention of unclaimed property by the director of the National Museum of Ireland. These initial provisions are key to the proposed Bill, with the register forming the basis on which property would be defined as unclaimed.

The draft Bill states that deposited property shall be considered to be unclaimed property where:

(a) the property is deposited in an institution for a period of not less than 80 years,

and

(b) (i) the property has not been accessed by the depositor since the date on which it was deposited in the institution concerned, or

(ii) a period of not less than 80 years has passed since the date on which the property was most recently accessed by the depositor.

As such, the Bill relates to safe deposit boxes which have not been accessed for a very long time indeed and which, in all likelihood, the rightful owners or their heirs are unaware of. I accept it is not all in boxes, as the Deputy outlined at the opening.

Where safe deposit boxes have been identified as unclaimed, the Bill states that institutions should notify persons who appear to be the holders of unclaimed property and effectively seek to reunite the property with its rightful owner. This includes through publication of notices which detail unclaimed property held by the institution and which notify the public of the steps that will be taken once the safe deposit box is deemed unclaimed.

Part 2 also provides for the examination of unclaimed property by the relevant institutions for the purpose of ascertaining or otherwise confirming the identity of the depositor. The timeframe for that inspection relates to the time since the safe deposit box was last accessed, and the inspection involves at least two persons not associated with one another. Relevant information ascertained from the inspection would then be included in the aforementioned register.

All of the above provisions in Part 2 very much relate to the regulation of financial institutions and place significant responsibilities on the relevant institutions. Given this fact, it is important to note the provisions would need detailed consideration by the Minister for Finance and the Central Bank with regard to the processes, regulation of the process and enforcement of the regulations proposed.

Part 3 builds on this regulation of safe deposit boxes and covers the proposed retention by the State of unclaimed property. The provisions would require institutions to give notice to the director of the National Museum of Ireland of the details of property deposited and inspected as a result of being deemed as unclaimed property. The director, or a person authorised by the director, would then be obliged to make a determination as to whether the unclaimed property concerned is of historical, archaeological or artistic importance. Where the unclaimed property is deemed to be of due importance, the director is empowered to retain such property on behalf of the State. Importantly, such property can be reclaimed by the rightful owner or heirs, with the director to be satisfied that the claimant is the relevant depositor.

As with Part 2, the substantive issues of Part 3 are not within my remit or the remit of the Department of Rural and Community Development. It is important to note the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media would need to consider these provisions carefully. Significant resources would appear to be required for areas under her remit. There are issues around the expertise and proposed role of the director of the National Museum, particularly when assessing items such as items of artistic merit and decision-making on reuniting property with rightful owners.

The issue of the Dormant Accounts Fund, which is within my remit, arises with regard to Part 5. This Part provides for the sale by the institutions of unclaimed property not retained by the State in a manner that would obtain the best price reasonably attainable. These funds would then be transferred to the Dormant Accounts Fund net of reasonable costs incurred by the institution. In addition, cash deposits would be transferred to the Dormant Accounts Fund directly. Again, the rightful owners can reclaim such funds from the relevant institution, with the funds then recouped from the Dormant Accounts Fund.

There are a number of interesting considerations here, for example, the role of financial institutions in selling such property, the issue of rightful owners seeking to reclaim items which have been sold, and indeed the current value of cash deposits left in safe deposit boxes more than 80 years ago. A sum such as £500 would have been a very large amount of money 80 years ago, but today would perhaps not even cover the costs associated with getting the funds legally transferred into the Dormant Accounts Fund, but the Deputy has made the point that this is not necessarily about the monetary value of what may be uncovered.

The objective of the Bill may relate more to the possibility there are items of historical or cultural value within some safe deposit boxes that the State could take into its care for the public good as opposed to a source of revenue for the Dormant Accounts Fund.

As I said, this is a detailed Bill covering a complex area that cuts across a number of Departments and agencies. I have noted throughout that many items need further careful consideration across a number of Departments on how best to achieve the desired objective. It will be necessary to consult widely across government on this issue. It is also important to clearly understand the scale of what is proposed and the potential cost to the Exchequer.

I again thank the Deputy for bringing this Private Members' Bill forward. It represents a valuable contribution in helping to address a challenge that has been raised for many years, albeit one that raises a number of issues that require careful further consideration.

For 250 years, or two and a half centuries if we go back to the earliest deposit box referred to by Deputy Ó Cuív, these boxes have lain undiscovered, unmoved and untouched, by and large, possibly along with other items, including works of art, maps, documents or larger items. The Bill proposes, in a very sensitive, legitimate and legally safeguarded way, to enable this generation to go back not earlier than 80 years to open them to see what they hold.

Every so often, to echo what the Chair said, someone has a brainstorm in this House and comes up with particularly creative and innovative legislation that will surely catch the imagination of the public. This is one such Bill, which the Chair gestured to. To set a child's imagination at work on this, never mind the imagination of an adult, an awful lot of fun could be had with the topic, but it is very serious. Why would someone have a safe deposit box in the first place? Why would people put items in a vault or a secure place? In earlier centuries, it might have made sense. When I was only a few years younger than I am now, I discovered that in Dublin there are one or two quite elaborate private vault- and safe deposit box-holding companies, which I did not realise or appreciate existed.

One of the other items of real interest is why these boxes remained untouched, unopened, and largely forgotten about, particularly the earlier ones. Was it because of debt or secrecy that only the holder of the box or items knew they were safeguarding them and did not pass on the information, either to family members or friends, that they held what we assume to be valuables? Certainly, if we go back to more recent times, a little more than 80 years or the past 100 years, why would people put these items away if they were not valuable? They could have been valuable as a treasured item, holding particular memorial or treasured value, having some cash value, or an item, such as deeds, that needed to be protected in a safe place where they were out of harm's way.

I hope there are some writers and creative-minded people out there who are observing this, who will now set their minds to work and will watch every little piece of this story unfold. This is chapter one. It is a little like the man in the ice. Obviously, that was much more profound historically as regards where the beginning of humanity can be dated to but Deputy Ó Cuív put it very well. Each of these deposit boxes and each of the items preserved or kept is a time capsule of its own, with a story of its own and possibly identifying details of its own, so that we get a picture of people, never mind the items they held on to. That is without reflecting for very long on what is proposed in the Bill. I would be interested to know whether this has been attempted in any other jurisdiction and what the outcomes were. I am not familiar with that but Deputy Ó Cuív will be. The officials who assisted him in researching and drafting the Bill have probably come across it at this stage but perhaps it is a first. If it is, that only adds to the significance of the legislation he has brought before us for consideration.

Of course, if we spend a little more time thinking of the possibilities of the Bill, great sensitivity is required because who knows what these boxes contain and what secrets they might hold? The holder of those secrets might never have intended that they be discovered and opened by strangers. That kind of sensitivity is required too. What I like about the Bill and how the Deputy has outlined it is that all those safeguarding elements have been carefully considered. Knowing the Deputy as I do, he will be open to any intelligent amendments or suggestions as the Bill passes through Committee Stage and both Houses for consideration.

For most of us, our experience of safe deposit boxes probably originated in James Bond movies as the preserve of the rich and very secretive. I wonder whether there will be gold bars. Will we find any gold ingots in any of these boxes? As the Deputy said, they will provide a window, at the very least, into so many different aspects of life and what people considered worth stowing away in secure places and why, the kind of people who did it, the kind of things that were stowed away and saved, and the multiple reasons they remained there. We all forget things sometimes.

The Minister of State used a word of caution at the end of his contribution. I welcome the support of the Government for this and encourage it, but this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to do something quite profound in respect of a nation's history and its individual stories. It is going back two and a half centuries and opening up countless time capsules and windows into the past. I urge the Government, while respecting and having regard to the boundaries of the public purse, that every effort be made to facilitate this. I am sure the financial institutions concerned will be more than willing to assist. This will reflect well. We will have to wait and see what comes out of it but, potentially, it will reflect very well. I am sure there will be big surprises and shocks too. There may be things we did not think were held in these places and did not want to know were held there. Undoubtedly, shocking discoveries that may affront the public may be counted among those things that have been spirited away into secure boxes over the centuries.

I thank the Chair for the opportunity to make a contribution on this, the Minister of State for his presence and Deputy Ó Cuív for inspired legislation, which is no surprise coming from him. The fact is he had the idea, developed the concept and has brought it very close to fruition. It is now up to both Houses to ensure it is brought to fruition. I wish the Deputy the very best with it.

I am sure Steven Spielberg is taking notes somewhere for a plot for a good movie.

I again welcome the debate. I again thank Deputy Ó Cuív for bringing the Bill forward and for tonight's discussion. It is the start of a much more detailed and interesting discussion where we will get to pull it apart a little more on Committee Stage.

As I said, this is a very complicated area cutting across at least three Departments, including the Departments of Finance and Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media, and my Department.

The provisions concern a large number of agencies, including the Central Bank, the National Treasury Management Agency, the National Museum of Ireland and the Property Registration Authority, each with specific and significant roles that could add considerably to their work. The provisions also place significant responsibility on the financial institutions in developing the register, seeking to notify rightful owners, inspecting unclaimed safe deposit boxes, cataloguing property and ultimately seeking to dispose of items in a manner that is consistent with obtaining the best reasonable price.

I recognise this is an issue that has been raised over a number of years and which has not yet been addressed. Going forward further consideration and consultation is needed around how the key objective of the proposed Bill can best be achieved, as regards fully understanding and addressing any possible legal issues and minimising costs to achieve the objectives in as effective a way as possible.

Finally, I thank Deputy Ó Cuív for the significant work that has gone into the Bill. I welcome the opportunity we have had this evening to discuss the issue so as to better understand how we can address the challenge of unclaimed property in safe deposit boxes going forward. I want to end on a upbeat note by thanking the Deputy for being creative and imaginative. It will be a windy road to find a path through this because of the number of agencies and Departments involved, but the treasure at the end of it will be worth the wait and effort.

Ba mhaith liom buíochas a ghlacadh leis an Aire agus leis an Teachta a tháinig anseo inniu. As I said, I do not know whether the lack of participation by the whole Opposition is a sign of agreement but I will take it as such.

The Minister of State raised a number of valid issues. On the other hand, we must be cautious because the system will always state the problems but not the solutions. My belief is that there are two different roles, one for public servants and one for politicians. The public servant's role is to warn and be cautious and the politician's role is to drive things forward and one without the other does not work. On the face of it, this proposals involves many agencies but some of the agencies have very specific roles. It was mentioned, for example, that the director of the National Museum would not have any expertise in art. That is why it is possible under this Bill to consult with the National Gallery. That is where the art expertise come from. When it comes to historical documentation, the National Library has a place. The Bill uses the whole panoply of national institutions but my feeling is that what would happen is that a committee would be formed comprising all the national institutions which mainly come under the remit of one Minister, the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media. I expect that is how it would be pulled together.

The second matter we must watch is that the system is always concerned about innovative things, rocking the status quo and moving away from the things it is familiar with. We need to get a much greater sense of adventure and be brave. There is an absolute obligation to start with the earliest safe deposit boxes in order that the risk of litigation or of people coming forward is lowest and we will learn as we go along. Laws can always be changed.

Resources are often used as an argument for not doing things. This country has become more wealthy. The interesting thing in this Bill is that the resources are minor for the wealth that would be achieved. Imagine the museums that could be filled. Property and staff resources would be needed. The artefacts would not have to be bought. Look at what we could get. If someone said they would give you the Louvre and asked if you were willing to staff it, that they would give all the paintings for free, would you take it? I hope Ireland would.

I often think about how averse we have become to spending money on culture, history, legacy and art. I think about the fact that the Coimisiún Béaloideasa was set up in 1933. It is the Folklore Commission. Money was put aside in the budget in 1933 to set up the Folklore Commission at a time when Ireland was very poor and was involved in the land annuities dispute. As a result we have one of the best collections of folklore anywhere in the world. It is now a priceless treasure that belongs to the nation and it would have been lost forever if we had not done this.

We have just come to the end of a decade of commemoration. At this stage, the vast majority of people have access to military archives in big communities and small ones. It was in 1947 when the world was just coming together after the Second World War when a decision was made to put human resources in. There were no computers or other modern facilities to put those archives together while the people were still alive. It was a long-term project because a commitment was given that none of them would be opened as long as any person who had been involved was alive. As we all know, these were only made available to the public in recent times.

In its early years, the State made some brave decisions on long-term projects that benefited the nation. This treasure trove is a potential resource that other nations will look at and say, "Wow, that was clever, that was innovative". We would probably wind up with a museum building dedicated to bank deposits.

I was interested in one point the Minister of State raised. I was in two minds about dormant accounts for this reason. I presume that it is not bank balances in the safe deposit boxes. It is more likely to be notes. In that event, as we will need to wait a minimum of 80 years and maybe 100 or 150 years, the notes will be worth more as museum pieces than as money, perhaps a lot more. I have collected a few old notes and ha'pennies and all sorts of things. I guarantee I am not cashing them in with the Central Bank. I think the amount of money that will be got from this will be small because in many cases, the intrinsic value of the historic artefact, even if it is currency of the time, would be worth more than the amount the State would get from putting it into dormant accounts. I suggest the State would be more than willing to forgo the monetary value and leave it where it should be in some institution.

I agree with careful consideration of things. A lot of time has already gone into this Bill and much preliminary work was done. We looked at all the legislation, including European and Irish legislation. A thorough job was done on it. I thank the two officials from the Office of Parliamentary Legal Advisers, who worked with me on it. On the other hand, it would be a big tragedy if the system were to close a thing down because it means work, hassle or making decisions. I ask that we proceed with reasonable speed, giving time for the various Departments to have their input, but the Government should put forward a finite time - it cannot be done by me or the Oireachtas - for each Department to come back with the issues it is concerned about in the Bill. We would then be able to have detailed, line by line, forensic examination of this Bill.

Due to a shortage of resources in the Oireachtas, many Members have brought forward small Bills. They have not had the resources that were luckily given to me by the Oireachtas to prepare this Bill. A huge amount of professional drafting work has gone into this Bill.

Anybody who looks at the Bill will see how detailed that work was. It reminded me of drafting a Bill when I was a Minister. I had my own staff drafting the heads and then the parliamentary drafts people came in and there was an over and back and meeting after meeting. This Bill was put together in the same Lego way that any Bill is put together, by people who knew what they were at. Therefore, I hope a process will immediately be put in place to start those discussions with other Departments to get clarification on the issues of concern in relation to the legislation. Resources and mechanics only follow when legislation becomes law. If Departments put it in the black hole, that would be a tragedy. If somebody suddenly found a pit that not only had a gold hoard in it - we have some fantastic things in the National Museum - but also had such a variation as is possible here, one would say, if it is only about money and the law, put the effort and human resources in and make it happen. I believe if this Bill passes, it will, in time, be seen as really positive for Ireland.

Question put and agreed to.
Cuireadh an Dáil ar athló ar 6.12 p.m. go dtí 2 p.m., Dé Máirt, an 25 Aibreán 2023.
The Dáil adjourned at 6.12 p.m. until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, 25 April 2023.
Barr
Roinn