Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

JOINT COMMITTEE ON ENTERPRISE AND SMALL BUSINESS díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 18 Feb 2004

Insurance Reform: Ministerial Presentation.

I welcome the Minister of State at the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, with special responsibility for labour affairs, Deputy Frank Fahey. The Minister of State is here to discuss insurance reform from the point of view of health and safety, which is his area of responsibility. I also want to welcome Mr. John Walsh, Assistant Secretary at the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment.

Perhaps the Minister of State could address us briefly before we commence with a question and answer session.

I thank you, Chairman, and the other members of the committee for having invited me to attend this meeting. I have watched the committee's work on insurance matters with great interest. I congratulate you, Chairman, on bringing to the fore many pertinent issues that in the past were not addressed as adequately as all of us would have wished. Great credit is due to your committee for bringing forward many of the issues that are now being addressed. The committee has created a great awareness in people's minds of the need for radical change. I am glad to see that is happening through a range of measures.

I will deal with the insurance question from the perspective of health and safety in the workplace. Significant efforts are being made by everybody to improve health and safety, promote greater awareness of risks and prevent accidents in the workplace. However, one of the most significant issues that has been raised by me with employers, proprietors and the unions is that companies that perform well have not been rewarded in the past through reductions in their insurance premia. Even companies that perform well are literally being fleeced as a result of fraudulent, exaggerated and spurious claims. I welcome the legislation that was passed last week but, on an operational basis, there is a need for further initiatives on which we are involved in discussions. I wish to tell the committee something about them.

Following discussions with the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, the insurance industry is now putting in place ways of linking compliance by employers on health and safety standards with reduced premia. The Health and Safety Authority is in discussion with the insurance industry to establish standards and protocols whereby companies that achieve the standards set by the HSA will automatically receive reductions in premia. Those discussions are ongoing and I expect to see progress being made in that respect. I have had discussions with the four semi-State agencies involved in health and safety: the motor and road safety sector, the water safety sector, the marine safety sector, and our own health and safety sector. I have suggested to them that it would make eminently good sense to have greater co-ordination between the four agencies in getting across the safety awareness message. Discussions are ongoing between my Department and the other Departments involved in order to bring this about.

We all applaud the "Pay attention" slogan that is used in the current road safety campaign. I would like that to be extended so that we could pool our resources and put across a much more effective "Think safety, pay attention" message.

The most heart-rending aspect of my job in the past 18 months is that fact that, almost every week, I receive accident investigation reports relating to people who have died in the workplace. The one thing that strikes me time and again is that particular accidents could have been averted had the people and companies involved been more aware of or thinking about safety. This applies, in particular, in the two black spot areas of agriculture and construction. There is no doubt that most of the accidents in those two sectors in the past 12 months could have been averted if people had been aware. The preventative message is the one which we must get across. I welcome the recommendations the committee has made in that respect.

I wish to comment on two points. There is a National Irish Safety Organisation award scheme which has a number of categories. The scheme has been in operation for 13 years and I would like to see it expanded and become much more prestigious. I make an annual award for safety innovation which is open to all companies and organisations, small and large. It is aimed at encouraging innovation in business. My Department is looking at ways and means to raise the prestige of the awards and make their presentation a much more important event in the safety calendar.

The HSA has issued extensive guidelines on compliance. The track records of companies in terms of good health and safety practices and preventative and awareness programmes should form the basis of a scheme of premia reductions. The insurance industry is proactive in bringing forward proposals. We are involved in ongoing discussions with the insurance companies in terms of bringing such reductions about. The HSA is involved in formal discussions with the insurance companies aimed at achieving a much more proactive approach to premia reductions.

There are two other areas of significance. As stated at the outset, fraud, exaggeration and spurious claims are, in my opinion, the biggest contributors to insurance costs. The new Bill addresses this issue in a major way. As the Insurance Federation stated, there is a need for a much better database on claims in order that they can be tracked in a much more effective and transparent way. We are involved in discussions with the insurance industry, employers, the Attorney General and the courts in terms of establishing how we can put in place a more effective transparent database that will take account of the data protection legislation, etc., so that we can "out" those involved in fraud. The committee's efforts in that regard have been very effective. The "Prime Time" programme that was shown some time ago was also effective. However, action in this area must be ongoing.

I am aware that members of the legal profession appeared before the committee. It is time this profession faced the fact that a small number of solicitors and lawyers have been involved in aiding and abetting insurance fraud and, in particular, spurious and exaggerated claims. The director general of the Law Society yesterday defended its members and stated that anybody who has evidence should produce it. I put it to the Law Society that it is time it outed some of the small number of those involved in the profession who are bringing it into disrepute. Until such time as this is done, I will not be satisfied that it is serious about stamping out the levels of fraud and exaggeration that are to be found.

When one considers some of the case studies that have come across my desk from small employers throughout the country in terms of the way in which they have been treated and the payments made, there is no question in their opinion that spurious, fraudulent and exaggerated claims were made against them. It must be noted that, largely on the steps of our courts, deals are made by solicitors and lawyers which should never be made. The legislation will go a long way towards dealing with that.

Until such time as we deal with the claims compensation culture that is endemic in this country, however, small and large companies will continue to be ripped off. That is my most important message this morning. We must change the culture. We are working hard with the Health and Safety Authority to do that and we welcome the initiatives the committee is taking to highlight this matter. I wish it luck in its efforts. We will continue to co-operate with it in highlighting those issues and bringing an end to the kind of regime that has existed for far too long in this country.

I thank the Minister of State for his contribution and his forthright views. He stated in the Dáil that the health and safety legislation will be coming before the House in a few months. Can he be more specific about the date of publication for the Bill? The heads to the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Bill and the Civil Liability and Courts Bill were published in advance. The committee was the first public forum before which the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Deputy McDowell, came with the heads of those Bills. The committee found its a useful exercise and we would appreciate it if the Minister of State could consider publishing the heads of the health and safety Bill and coming before the committee with them. We would make time available to allow him to do that.

The Bill will be published in April. I will be happy to come before the committee either prior to its publication or immediately afterward. It is a large and complex Bill and I will be open to amendments and to considering, in a methodical way, the various aspects it involves. It has been quite a task to put the Bill together. There are many areas in respect of which I will be open to suggestions for improvements. We will also be involved in discussions with the social partners on aspects of the Bill. It is a critically important item of legislation and it takes the area of health and safety on to a totally new plane.

We made a request in our first interim report that the Government should prioritise four Bills in order to have them passed. The Bill sponsored by the Minister of State is the third of these and is critical in nature.

I welcome the Minister of State, Deputy Fahey, and I compliment him on the great work his Department is doing in the area of health and safety. One leading insurance company referred to Ireland as a dangerous place to work. What would the Minister of State say in response to that assertion, which was refuted by the representatives of many of the other companies which came before the committee?

The Minister of State indicated that companies which perform well are not being given credit for their efforts. I could not agree more. At least in motor insurance there is a no-claims bonus, whereas in industry one is charged the same whether one puts safety measures in place or not. Until something is done people have no incentive to introduce the necessary safety measures.

The construction and farming sectors were described as the most dangerous and as a farmer I admit that the nature of the work means it can be dangerous, particularly with children around. There are slurry pits, tractors and so on and it can be hard to control safety on a farm. Insurers could do more by giving an incentive and reduced costs. We have new safety legislation being introduced, including the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Bill, and we need a huge reduction in insurance costs, particularly for small companies. Otherwise those companies will not be able to continue operation.

I have not seen the report which stated that Ireland is a dangerous place to work.

It was sent in by a leading insurance company and we were taken aback by it.

I do not think Ireland is any more dangerous a place to work than most other places. Our health and safety record is better than most but what may be wrong is that one could read statistics on the level of insurance claims in a certain way. We have been negligent in the past and it is only in the last few years that stringent action in a range of areas has been taken. Legislation has been introduced but that alone will not solve the problem. A safety culture must be introduced and the current culture eradicated. The Deputy mentioned agriculture and we have a major health and safety initiative in schools, with companies like FBD involved in very good work on a national competition on health and safety in the workplace.

The two saddest accident investigation reports I dealt with recently involved two children being killed in agricultural accidents. A simple lesson must be learnt by the agricultural sector - children cannot be allowed near tractors. That would have saved the lives of the children involved in the two saddest accidents I have read about as Minister. Those children should not have been in a farmyard. One can have all the legislation one likes but until such time as farmers and the agricultural sector get prevention into their heads we will still have accidents. That is my main message today. These accidents can be prevented through awareness.

My first question relates to the new legislation which has been promised for a long time. I accept what the Tánaiste and the Minister have said, that that legislation has grown much bigger than was originally anticipated, but I agree with the Chairman that it would be useful for us to have the heads of the Bill as soon as possible. It is important we have some input before the legislation is finalised. The social partners are very important but they seem to have more input than the Oireachtas in framing legislation and that should be addressed. I agree with the Minister of State that legislation alone will not solve this problem.

Will the heads of the Bill include the Law Reform Commission recommendation on corporate manslaughter as a crime? Are there resourcing implications for the Health and Safety Authority to ensure there are adequate inspectors to monitor and enforce the legislation? If the resources are not in place the Bill is useless.

On models of risk reduction, Hibernian has a sophisticated risk management system and if a small or medium-sized business agrees to operate that risk management system, with ongoing evaluations, Hibernian offers a 15% reduction of the insurance premium. How can that be generalised to ensure all companies run such a system to reduce risks?

The Minister of State's comments extended beyond his own Department. The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform recently published legislation we sought which deals with the rogue applicant for compensation who wants to chance his or her arm. The Minister touched today on a fundamental flaw in that legislation when he referred to the focus of the legislation being kept on the rogue applicant. However, it does not deal with the rogue flag-carrier, or solicitor, who knowingly pursues and sometimes advises a rogue claim to be brought to court. There seems to be no sanction against such people. A certificate should have to be submitted by a solicitor stating that from a professional perspective he or she believes a stateable case in law is being brought by the applicant. I am interested in the views of the Minister of State on whether we can focus not just on the rogue applicant but the rogue solicitor also.

On the new legislation, when the parliamentary counsel has completed his work I am happy to make information available, including the heads of the Bill.

Will that be the draft Bill?

Obviously we have to have a Bill agreed by Government.

I refer to the heads before it is agreed.

We will certainly try to come back to the Deputy as quickly as possible. I am anxious to have the Deputy involved in a positive way in this exercise.

Yes, there will be a new section on corporate manslaughter. The Tánaiste and I have accepted the report of the Law Reform Commission and that provision is being written into the Bill. This is a complex issue and the Attorney General is dealing with it.

On adequate inspector numbers, we have 160 staff in the Health and Safety Authority, 100 of whom are active inspectors in the field.

There are 100 members of staff in the field all the time.

We have 100 people on inspections on a full-time basis. I have said before we would like more inspectors but our resources dictate their numbers. They are doing a very effective job in dealing with the main problem areas. We respond as adequately as we can to reported breaches in the legislation. I am satisfied that the work being done by the Health and Safety Authority and its inspectors is effective. One cannot police every situation but we review the performance of the HSA and its inspectors on an ongoing basis and we are entirely satisfied that a good job is being done.

Good models of risk reduction are now being put in place. We welcome the fact that, for the first time in recent years, insurance companies are employing new systems and have appointed fraud officers. We have been in discussions with the industry on establishing a formalised model of risk management. I agree with the Deputy that the development of such a model on a national basis and across all industries would be worthwhile. I have asked the HSA to put together a structure by which we might put such a model in place. The authority is in discussion with the insurance companies on how a standard risk management model could operate. Such a standard given by the HSA to a particular company would automatically be accepted by an insurance company for a reduction in premium.

I will bring the Deputy's comments on sanctions on rogue solicitors to the attention of the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform. He is acutely aware of this issue. Legislation alone will not solve this problem. Until the legal profession addresses this issue - and I am satisfied the issue is being addressed - we will not see the impact we all desire.

I welcome the statement of the Minister of State on corporate manslaughter, which was a recommendation of the Law Reform Commission. The statement sends a strong signal to businesses which contribute to a safety culture which results in accidents.

The Irish Congress of Trade Unions discussed this matter with the committee. One of congress's suggestions was that trade union safety officers should be given an element of statutory backing in policing safety. There will never be a sufficient number of inspectors to achieve a proper regime of enforcement on the ground. One cannot expect complete enforcement from 100 inspectors, neither can we expect a huge increase in the number of inspectors. Would the ICTU's suggestion be a practical way of enforcing safety in the workplace? I believe it could be a positive move and the Minister of State has said he intends to work with the social partners on this matter.

I welcome the Minister of State and his official, Mr. Walsh. I am impressed by Deputy Fahey's practical approach and down-to-earth statements on this issue.

With increased mechanisation in agriculture, construction and industry, noise levels have increased and it is easy to have an accident. While legislative moves are welcome and necessary there is no substitute for getting people to think and be aware of safety. The issue of safety must be continually brought to people's attention. In many walks of life people are not thinking enough. One would be amazed to see the carelessness on building sites and farms. I come from a farm myself and I know that many accidents could be avoided. We must have a campaign to make people aware of safety. One can enforce rules, regulations and laws but if people do not think of safety we will go nowhere.

I thank the Minister of State. I am impressed by his down-to-earth approach.

Farmyard accidents usually involve children and are the most horrendous of all. Would it be possible to set up a separate unit for the agricultural industry? The Irish Farmers' Association does a very good job in protecting the interests of its members and might participate in such an initiative. Farm safety is a specialised area.

I agree with the Minister of State that no matter what legislation one introduces, enforcement on the ground will always be vital. People who work in the building industry are very conscious of the fact that they work in a dangerous industry. People who work on rigs at sea receive excellent safety training and their employers reward them in that respect. The only way to ensure that one has an inspector on every building site is to give workers protection if they decide to inform on their employer about a blatant breach of safety regulations. In that respect, would the Minister of State consider introducing a whistle blowers' charter or including such an element in the legislation he is preparing? People are conscious of safety. If building workers are not given safety training on one job they will have received it on another. In the building industry people move from one site to another. Some employers are very good at safety instruction and employees carry that with them to other jobs. When employees see blatant breaches of safety codes we must be prepared to give them protection if they decide to protect their fellow workers by informing on their employer.

The new legislation provides, for the first time, for safety representatives in company situations. These will be representatives of the workforce and will have a statutory basis. It will be their task to represent the interests of the workforce to management. They will often be union people, as the Deputy has suggested, but this will not necessarily be the case. Their role will be to ensure that a good partnership exists between managers and workers in the implementation of a safety regime and culture. That will provide for the workers in a company who see bad practice and want to expose it but who may be afraid to do so. This is a significant part of the legislation. It recognises the problem identified by Deputies Conor Lenihan and Kathleen Lynch. It will have a significant impact on the management of health and safety within companies.

I do not feel a new agency for safety in the farming sector would benefit the situation to a greater extent than is happening at present. A farm safety partnership is in place. The IFA, to its credit, is very much involved in farm safety partnership. There is a significant drive in the agriculture sector between Teagasc, the IFA and the other farm organisations to drive new initiatives on safety. I have worked closely with the IFA in the preparation by farmers of their health and safety statement. It is not necessary to spend a great deal of money on the preparation of such statements. We are now putting in place a number of initiatives to assist farmers in the preparation of a health and safety statement without it costing a great deal of money. The partnership is central to that process. I believe that addresses the issue identified as being a problem in the past.

I thank the Minister of State for meeting with us this morning and for his forthright views. I am sure I speak for all members when I say we would like an opportunity to discuss with him the heads of the Bill as we did with the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Deputy McDowell, in regard to the Civil Liabilities Bill. Perhaps we could assist the Minister and his officials on what will be extremely important legislation to tackle the problem of high insurance premiums which are, as he said, unsustainable.

The joint committee adjourned at 10.22 a.m. sine die.
Barr
Roinn