The first item is COM (2009) 484. Given the information provided by the Department, it is proposed to note the adopted proposal. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Re COM (2009) 485, we have received the same note from the Department. It is proposed to note the adopted proposal. Is that agreed? Agreed. On COM (2009) 492, it is proposed to note this adopted measure. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Based on the information available, it is proposed that COM (2009) 411 and COM (2009) 412 do not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
In regard to COM (2009) 462, given the information provided by the Department, it is proposed to note the proposal. Is that agreed? Agreed.
In respect of COM (2009) 508 and COM (2009) 509, based on the information available, it is proposed that these proposals do not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Regarding COM (2009) 513, based on the information available, it is proposed that this proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed. Re COM (2009) 516, given the information provided by the Department, it is proposed to note this technical proposal. Is that agreed? Agreed.
In regard to COM (2009) 517, based on the information available, it is proposed that this proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed. On COM (2009) 530, given the information provided by the Department, it is proposed to note this codification proposal. Is that agreed? Agreed. Regarding COM (2009) 535, given the information provided by the Department, it is proposed to note this codification proposal. Is that agreed? Agreed.
I will deal with proposals that require no further scrutiny that are sent to sectoral committees for information. Regarding COM (2009) 505 and COM (2009) 506, based on the information available, it is proposed that these proposals do not warrant further scrutiny by this committee. However, given its interest in the Common Fisheries Policy, it is proposed to forward the proposals to the Joint Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food for information. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Re SEC (2009) 1133, it is proposed that this proposal does not warrant further detailed scrutiny. However, it is also proposed to write to the Department of Finance seeking an update on the consideration of this proposal and, in particular, the outcome of the Council's Second Reading of 2010 budget in regard to the climate change element of the proposal. It is also proposed to forward the proposal for information to the Joint Committee on Finance and the Public Service, given the possible implications of this proposal to the Exchequer and to the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Joint Committee on European Affairs given the mobilisation of funds for the Palestinian Authority and the reconstruction of Gaza as well as the proposal to mobilise funds to assist developing countries in mitigating the effects of climate change. Is that agreed? Agreed.
It is proposed to note CFSP (2009) 706. Is that agreed? Agreed. With regard to Title IV and Title VI measures, let us consider COM (2009) 322. As it is not clear whether an opt-in motion by the Oireachtas will be required on foot of this proposal, it is proposed that it be forwarded to the Joint Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights for its information in advance of possible consideration of an opt-in motion by the Oireachtas. It is further proposed that the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform be asked to inform that committee as soon as possible whether such a motion will be required with respect to this proposal or the underlying regulation. Is that agreed? Agreed.