The first proposal is COM (2009) 582. It is proposed to note this adopted measure. Is that agreed? Agreed. It is also proposed to note the adopted measures COM (2009) 583, COM (2009) 608, COM (2009) 641 and COM (2009) 668. Is that agreed? Agreed.
In light of the information given, it is proposed that the committee notes adopted measure, COM (2010) 48 — FON. In light of the information given, it is also proposed that the committee notes adopted measures COM (2010) 50 and COM (2009) 629.
Based on the information available, it is proposed that COM (2010) 20, COM (2010) 21, COM (2010) 54, COM (2010) 12 and COM (2010) 49 do not require further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Based on the information available, it is proposed that COM (2009) 672 does not warrant further detailed scrutiny. It is also proposed that the committee write to the Department of Finance to seek clarification on the amendments it is currently seeking to the draft proposal. It is also proposed that it be forwarded to the Joint Committee on Finance and the Public Service. Is that agreed? Agreed. It is proposed to note adopted measure COM (2010) 26. However, it also proposed to forward the Council recommendation made public by the adoption of this decision, together with the related Council decision and opinion, to the Joint Committee on European Affairs and the Joint Committee on Finance and the Public Service for information. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Based on the information available, it is proposed that COM (2009) 701 does not warrant further scrutiny. It is further proposed that this proposal be sent for information to the Joint Committee on Transport and the Joint Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Based on the information available, it is proposed that COM (2009) 702 does not warrant further scrutiny. It is further proposed that this proposal be sent for information to the Joint Committee on Transport and the Joint Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights. Is that agreed? Agreed.
In light of the information available, it is proposed that COM (2010) 7, COM (2010) 8, COM (2010) 9, COM (2010) 56 and COM (2010) 58 do not warrant further scrutiny. It is further proposed that these proposals be sent to the Joint Committee on Enterprise, Trade and Employment. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Given the information provided by the Department it is proposed to note adopted measure, CFSP (2010) 106. Is that agreed? Agreed. Given the information provided by the Department it is proposed to note adopted measure, CFSP (2010) 107. Is that agreed? Agreed. Given the information provided by the Department it is proposed to note adopted measure, CFSP (2010) 108. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Given the information provided by the Department it is proposed to note adopted measure, CFSP (2010) 109. Is that agreed? Agreed. Given the information provided by the Department it is proposed to note adopted measure, CFSP (2010) 110. Is that agreed? Agreed. Given the information provided by the Department it is proposed to note adopted measure, CFSP (2010) 111. Is that agreed? Agreed. Given the information provided by the Department it is proposed to note adopted measure, CFSP (2010) 112. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Given the information provided by the Department it is proposed to note adopted measure, CFSP (2010) 113. Is that agreed? Agreed. Given the information provided by the Department it is proposed to note adopted measure, CFSP (2010) 118. Is that agreed? Agreed. Given the information provided by the Department it is proposed to note adopted measure, CFSP (2010) 119. Is that agreed? Agreed. Given the information provided by the Department it is proposed to note adopted measure, CFSP (2010) 120. Is that agreed?
