We have a number of new proposals before the committee for consideration. No. 1.1 is COM (2010)15, page 31, brief 2, a proposal for a Council regulation amending Decision 2008/839/JHA on migration from the Schengen information system. In light of information provided by the Department and the committee's previous decision that the pre-Lisbon proposal did not require further scrutiny, it is proposed again that the measure does not require further scrutiny by the committee. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 1.2 is COM (2010) 220, a proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an agreement between the European Union and South Africa, amending the existing agreement on trade, development and co-operation. Based on the information available, it is proposed that the proposal does not warrant scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 1.3, COM (2010) 316, and No. 1.4, COM (2010) 317, are proposals on the terrorist finance tracking programme. Based on the information available, it is proposed to note these adopted justice measures. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 1.5, COM (2010) 328, and No. 1.6, COM (2010) 483, are proposals on an agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco. Based on the available information, it is proposed that the proposals do not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 1.7 is COM (2010) 466, a proposal on Article 19 of the agreement on the European Economic Area. Based on the information available, it is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 1.8 is COM (2010) 470, a proposal on fishing opportunities applicable in the Baltic Sea. Based on the information available, it is proposed that this proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 1.9 is COM (2010) 473, a proposal on the security of explosives. In light of the information provided by the Department, it is proposed that the measure does not require further scrutiny by the committee. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 1.10 is COM (2010) 498, a proposal for a regulation laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the European Union. Based on the information available, it is proposed that this proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Has the Joint Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food dealt with this proposal?