Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Joint Committee on Key Issues affecting the Traveller Community (2023) díospóireacht -
Thursday, 7 Dec 2023

Traveller Accommodation: Discussion (Resumed)

Apologies have been received from Senator Joe O'Reilly.

I remind members that they must be physically present within Leinster House in order to take part in the public meeting. I will not allow members to take part in the meeting if they are not within Leinster House. The evidence of witnesses physically present in Leinster House is protected by absolute privilege. Witnesses should not criticise or make charges against any person or entity by name or in such a way as to make, her or it identifiable. I propose that we publish the opening statements on the committee website. Is that agreed? Agreed. I suggest that we invite witnesses speak for in or around five minutes and then we will open up the discussion to members. Is that agreed? Agreed.

The first item on the agenda is Traveller accommodation. I invite Ms Kelly of the National Traveller Women's Forum to begin her presentation. I thank the witnesses for coming in this morning.

Ms Bridget Kelly

On behalf of the National Traveller Women's Forum, I thank the committee for giving us the opportunity to speak here today. I am a community development worker with the National Traveller Women's Forum, which is a national organisation made up of Traveller women and Traveller women's organisations throughout Ireland. The National Traveller Women's Forum works from a human rights-based approach. Our aim is to strive for full equality for Traveller women and for all.

Accommodation has always been a key issue for Travellers. Poor accommodation impacts on every aspect of Traveller women's lives and the lives of our families, namely, our health, education, employment, mental health and opportunities for inclusion in society. Since the publication of the Final Report of the Joint Committee on Key Issues Affecting the Traveller Community in 2021 there has been very little progress in this area. Consistent failure to deliver targets for culturally appropriate accommodation under Traveller accommodation plans continues to be a serious issue, leading to serious overcrowding, hidden homelessness and families being left to live in Third World living conditions. Mirroring broader trends in the non-delivery of social housing, the increasing policy has been for the market to provide solutions to accommodation issues through the housing assistance payment for the private rented market. However, Travellers, particularly in smaller towns, face huge problems on the basis of their identity, including racism and discrimination by some landlords in trying to access private rented accommodation. Many Travellers are having to sublet and take substandard accommodation in desperation. All these factors contribute to the over-representation of Travellers in homelessness figures and increasing hidden homeless among the community. We also see Traveller families staying in homeless services a lot longer than settled people because of the difficulty in getting private rented accommodation and the lack of Traveller-specific accommodation available for families to exit homeless services.

In the programme board update published in April 2023, the expert group noted progress in relation to ethnic identifiers for Traveller households, increased engagement with the Central Statistics Office and changes to the social housing needs assessment process. Progress was also noted in communicating with directors of service in local authorities to use their emergency powers to bypass problems with decision-making by elected members regarding Traveller accommodation and the inclusion of Traveller accommodation in local development plans, as well as a review of funding allocations from the Department in respect of Traveller accommodation. These are all very welcome, however there are fundamental actions that have yet to be progressed.

The caravan loan scheme is a national pilot scheme that was initiated in 2021 and 2022 and rolled out in five different areas - Kildare, Cork, Limerick and in the south and east of Dublin. For some reason, Kildare has withdrawn from the pilot scheme. Some issues arose in that regard. There were four pilot areas then. The caravan loan pilot scheme was very much welcomed but as time went on issues emerged. The pilot scheme has now been rolled out nationally to 2024 with an allocation of 80 loans costing €3.2 million. The scheme discriminated against Travellers in its design. People are being asked to take out loans, who are already on local authority waiting lists. A rental scheme could have been a better option, not least as it allows for a higher specification of unit and longer term value, centralised purchase by the local authority, and funded by the Department, with a broader scope for Travellers.

Another issue that arose with the caravan loan scheme was the cost of mobile homes. The cost of mobile homes has increased. Another issue was the quality of mobile homes. Pro rata to the loan on offer, €40,000 was not enough to purchase a standard mobile home. Some suppliers increase the price when they discover that the State is paying for a mobile home. This is a big issue that we have noticed, and it is not helping the families who are trying to purchase mobile homes.

Why did the loan scheme, as a lesser alternative, supplant the rental scheme in some areas where it was operational, for example in Dublin and Limerick? There were also concerns at local level with the roll-out and mismatches between demand and supply. In some areas there was a high demand from applicants looking for the caravan loan scheme. For example, in some local authorities there were 25 applications but only two allocations of a loan. This is of huge concern. The national Traveller representatives on the Local Traveller Accommodation Consultative Committee, LTACC, have flagged this, along with all the local Traveller projects as well, so it is an issue, in addition to all the other concerns in relation to the caravan loan scheme.

The Traveller organisations have called for an independent review of the caravan loan scheme. The National Traveller Women's Forum believes that the following areas need to be prioritised nationally. Changes are needed in the area of planning and while those changes are put in place, the decision-making on the Part 8 function could switch to an executive function for a temporary period. It is conclusive in the expert review report and the experience of national Traveller organisations that the key component missing in the Government's approach to tackling the Traveller accommodation crisis is an independent authority to oversee delivery.

Repeal of the trespass legislation is needed to ensure the reversal of the erosion of Traveller nomadism. While awaiting the review of this legislation, we call for a moratorium on evictions until the accommodation needs of Travellers have been met.

Implementation of the expert review group's 32 recommendations with no objections or amendments is crucial to ensure adequate supply and standard of culturally appropriate accommodation for Travellers.

Clear timelines, a budget for implementation and tangible targets with corresponding accountability measures along with strong Traveller engagement at all levels will be essential for delivery. Racism, discrimination and bias among elected representatives must be challenged and sanctions imposed on local authorities who do not meet their targets.

I am happy to take questions and give answers later.

Ms Eileen O'Shea

John O'Sullivan and I will be presenting today.

The Traveller Visibility Group and Cork Traveller Women’s Network appreciate the opportunity to share the feedback and lived experience of Cork Travellers facing accommodation issues. We are aware that our national organisation, ITM, has already presented here. I echo all of its statements and comments, calling particularly for implementation along with the National Traveller Women's Forum.

For over three decades both Breda O’Donoghue and Brigid Carmody have been advocating for Traveller rights, including access to Traveller accommodation in Cork city. No additional Traveller accommodation has been built in Cork since 1989. John O'Sullivan has been a Traveller activist for over 15 years. He along with Brigid Carmody and Breda O’Donoghue represent Traveller families' and individuals’ issues and accommodation needs at the local Traveller accommodation consultative committee, LTACC, the Traveller accommodation unit, TAU, and homelessness services among other areas.

I will give some wider feedback on Traveller accommodation in light of this joint committee's recommendations. Due to many issues compounded by societal and systemic racism, Traveller accommodation is a politically sensitive issue that impacts and influences decision-makers at the top level who are trying to deliver Traveller accommodation. The circular detailing a temporary mandatory moratorium on the requirement of Part 8 planning for public projects is welcome but it is not being used with regard to Traveller accommodation in Cork and it is difficult to see how the mandatory aspect can be enforced. There have always been negative submissions against new Traveller accommodation developments at Part 8 stage. It was reported verbally by Cork City Council members and officials that the current Cork city Traveller accommodation plan, TAP, had over 1,000 submissions against the council’s adoption of the TAP, although the exact number of submissions against the TAP was not shared formally.

While we have an active Traveller interagency group, TIG, Traveller accommodation unit and the LTACC in Cork, Travellers are not seeing any improvements on the ground, no real positive change, even with the involvement of the local authorities in these Traveller-related working groups.

The previous five TAPs have not assisted in the delivery of Traveller accommodation. The current interventions and resources, along with ring-fenced funding in Traveller accommodation budgets are not delivering real homes for Traveller families in Cork or across the country. In the last 20 years or more, two sites were built in Cork. Both were replacement sites with the older sites being demolished, leading to significant improvement in living circumstances and a few additional units. Both replacement sites were driven by the old sites impacting the development of significant commercial interests, namely, Apple and the Mahon Point Shopping Centre. Incidentally, impacting commercial interests seems to be more of a real impetus in delivering Traveller accommodation than the Housing (Traveller Accommodation) Act or the last five TAPs.

We need to overcome the real barriers impacting Traveller accommodation which are rooted in systemic and societal anti-Traveller racism. We respectfully ask for an independent body responsible for the delivery of additional Traveller accommodation to meet the needs of Travellers currently in need of homes, namely, a national Traveller accommodation authority or agency. The need for this has been evidenced during each of the last five TAPs. The Government-appointed expert group on Traveller accommodation recommended the establishment of such a body several years ago. We do not believe that it is in the local authority’s gift to deliver on Traveller accommodation when the barriers to delivering Traveller accommodation are political in nature.

The application of the public sector equality and human rights duty, PSEHRD, needs to move from the aspirational to the real. Provision of Traveller accommodation needs to be PSEHRD proofed both at a national and local authority level. This needs to include access to caravans and mobile homes, the caravan loan scheme, funding streams to provide culturally appropriate accommodation, transient halting sites, etc. For example, there is currently no funding stream available to local authorities to provide a caravan or a mobile home. We only have the caravan loan scheme, where an approved social housing applicant has to take out a loan, or the emergency replacement scheme solely in the case of destruction by fire, storm or flooding where the local authority can access 50% of the funding from the Department leaving the local authority to resource the remaining 50%. This is clearly not sustainable nor does it take into account the needs of the Traveller community.

John O'Sullivan will now discuss the caravan loan scheme.

Mr. John O'Sullivan

The Traveller Visibility Group and the Cork Traveller Women's Network, along with Traveller families and local authority officials, have been told that the caravan loan scheme is the only show in town in terms of new Traveller accommodation at present and for the foreseeable future. Since the scheme was launched in Cork city there have been 37 applicants and only five allocated loans, leaving 32 applicants on the waiting list. As it stands, it will take a minimum of seven years for this waiting list to be cleared, not allowing for new applicants who may seek the loan in the future.

If this is the only Traveller accommodation available at present and there has been no additional Traveller accommodation built in Cork over the past 30 years, the caravan loan scheme will not be able to address the urgent housing crisis that Travellers have faced in Cork for decades. Most Travellers, who are eligible for social housing wait a minimum of ten years to be allocated a house.

The distribution of caravan loans available across the country was based on population of Travellers in an area rather than being based on demand and need, which has caused issues. While local authorities, Traveller organisations and the wider Traveller community have all expressed their concerns and dissatisfaction with the caravan loan scheme being the only available option for Traveller accommodation, the Department of housing has offered no alternatives.

Travellers should not be asked to take out a €40,000 loan for a temporary accommodation solution while they await long-term accommodation. They are the only ethnic group being asked to take out a loan for a social housing option. We feel this practice is discriminatory and not fit for purpose.

I thank the witnesses for their attendance and presentations. The committee has already done a fair bit of work on the accommodation issue and a number of things are emerging. One is that the loan scheme is not fit for purpose at all; I fully agree with Mr. O'Sullivan on that. When we make our recommendations, I will be suggesting that Travellers have a rental scheme like anyone else going for social housing who are not asked to take on a loan for a social house. They pay rent and the house is allocated, and the same should apply here. I agree with the witnesses that it is discriminatory. I do not see why it is done like this; it does not make any sense. Maybe we could ask the Department for the rationale as to why it is doing it like this and why it does not have an actual social provision as with the overall social housing scheme.

I have been asking parliamentary questions on the Spring Lane halting site. The reply that I got yesterday or the day before indicated that on 4 August this year, the Department granted stage 1 approval for the redevelopment of the site with a budget of €12.69 million. On 27 September, a stage 2 application was submitted by the local authority, including a revised estimated amount of €20.49 million, so it has gone up. The Department is considering the application regarding the increased funding sought and the additional information provided by the local authority. I would like to keep the pressure on because if we can get this funding released, the council can move on. It will not have any excuse but to move on to the next step. Part 8 is also an issue and I understand it is going down the Part 8 route which brings me to my first question.

Ms O'Shea said there were 1,000 submissions against the council's adoption of the TAP. Has anyone had sight of any of those submissions?

Ms Eileen O'Shea

No. This was said to us verbally by Cork City Council members. We have not seen that those submissions and we have not seen formal documentation of the submissions.

If we are to get to the root of this whole issue, we need to find out what these submissions are saying, who has put them in and what their concerns are. We need to acknowledge that they have some concerns otherwise they would not have gone to the trouble of making a submission.

If we know what the concerns are and can address those concerns, we may go some way down the road to dealing with this. Perhaps we can ask for those submissions to made available to the committee in order that we can examine them to see if there is a common thread running through them. That would be important. Everything else has been said.

This is extremely difficult politically and I know councillors all over the country come under terrible pressure from constituents. The issue does not just concern councillors but goes beyond that when there is a proposal to put in place accommodation for Travellers or whatever. The issue is bigger than just councillors who are representing what people say to them. It is a societal one. Do the witnesses have any proposals as to how we might deal with the inherent bias of society, which seems to me to be the issue?

Ms Breda O'Donoghue

Deputy Stanton asked how many submissions were submitted to the local authority. The issue is very close to my heart in the sense that both Mr. O'Sullivan and I were sitting in the council chamber watching the local councillors in that area vote for that particular TAP. At the time there was a lot of very negative media coverage around the Traveller accommodation on Spring Lane. I am not sure if everybody is familiar with Spring Lane. It is probably one of the oldest, most traditional campsites for Travellers in the Cork area. I lived on the site when it opened originally and I lived adjacent to the site on what was called an unofficial site at the time. My parents reared all my family on that site and my grandparents lived on the site. Some of the most popular objections to Traveller accommodation on that site came from the community that was built up around the Spring Lane area. The word on the ground is that people there feel there should not be a caravan site there in the first place. It was originally Spring Lane. Some people now like to call it Ballyvolane, so there is a bit of social status around the site.

There have been some objections to the site concerning antisocial behaviour. We accept that but it is a Garda issue. One thing has nothing to do with the other. There are over 100 children on the site who have no bedrooms, no access to a shower and, in some cases, no access to electricity. We welcome the allocation of funds to progress the accommodation issue.

To look at the bigger picture, the issue for us is that there has been no addition to the Traveller accommodation in over 30 years. We have a large surplus of families who have never been housed. Some have been forced into social housing simply because they had nowhere else to go. Even if we do resolve Spring Lane, and I hope we do and that the work is done this year, we will still be dealing with a very large number of families who have seen no improvement in the dilapidated sites they are living in right now. We also have a huge number of homeless Traveller families who are not even included in the TAP. It is a very big picture.

While we welcome the additional accommodation on Spring Lane, it is not an addition to Traveller accommodation but another replacement site, as were the two previous sites. We are still dealing with a huge number of people who have nowhere to go, are not included in the current TAP and probably will not be included in the next one either.

As we said at our last meeting, I realise that it is extraordinarily difficult for children to try to do their homework in very overcrowded and unsuitable conditions.

Ms Breda O'Donoghue

Yes.

Earlier, I passed on to the clerk the text of another parliamentary question I tabled in respect of homework clubs and the Supporting Travellers and Roma, STAR, education pilot project, which is under way. While I recognise that the Department of Education is doing a lot with that pilot project, I contend that in addition to housing, we need to start providing homework clubs and premises where children can go after school to get support and help. The Department is doing a lot of work in that area but we should be working on that in tandem with the housing issue.

There are four STAR pilot areas, Galway, Wexford, Dublin and Cork. Additional resources are provided, including an additional educational welfare officer, an additional home-school community liaison co-ordinator and two Traveller-Roma community education workers from the local communities employed by local Traveller-Roma support groups. Based on identified local needs, the STAR teams run a wide range of initiatives. The pilot project is very positive but I would like to see it expanded, as needed. There is a lot more in my parliamentary question and I ask that it be circulated at some stage.

There is a lot we can do in tandem with housing. While it is crucial, we must not wait for housing to be resolved because there are other problems that need to be dealt with. Otherwise, another generation of young people will be failed by the system.

Regarding actions, as we have seen from Deputy Stanton's input and his parliamentary question, it is important that we write to the council and get the information needed. It is great that committee members care so much about the issues. Education is an issue that the committee must focus on in January.

Ms Eileen O'Shea

The Traveller Visibility Group hosts the STAR projects in Cork city and we have enjoyed hosting them over the last three years.

Deputy Stanton referred to doing things in tandem and he is dead right. During the Covid-19 pandemic, we saw the digital divide but we also saw that for those living on a halting site or in overcrowded living conditions, it was extremely challenging to do schoolwork online. The role of the STAR education workers and home-school liaison officer was crucial in breaking down barriers. Accommodation is integral to the delivery and development of education outcomes for Travellers. Both aspects very much go hand in hand. Ms O'Donoghue is right that it is a larger picture and we need inter-agency and interdepartmental help to overcome this.

In terms of societal racism, I call for a national campaign to tackle anti-Traveller racism and build bridges in communities. The State has a responsibility to work on that.

I have to leave shortly to attend a function. I apologise in advance.

I thank the witnesses. I sat on Cork County Council's Traveller consultative forum many years ago. There was a very powerful group of Traveller women on the group. We are now approaching the end of 2023. As Ms O'Donoghue said, the Government stated it would deal specifically with Spring Lane but we are 30 years behind when it comes to providing accommodation. I reiterate Deputy Stanton's comment that education is the key but you need appropriate settings to get that education.

Mr. O'Sullivan said that 32 applicants are still waiting for a loan. We have spoken in the committee numerous times about providing alternative accommodation such as pods, which could last longer and be better value for money. The solution requires people to think outside the box.

I was very interested in what Ms O'Shea said about the submissions. We have to take at face value Cork City Council's statement that it received over 1,000 submissions but I find it very strange that the witnesses were told that verbally. When Deputies table parliamentary questions asking about, say, a blue biro there may be no mention of blue biros in the response but at least there will be a response in writing.

I thank the witnesses for being here. I understand the work that goes into this.

I would love to be in Spring Lane working face to face with people and thrashing out the issues. There is such a mixture of families there. We know there are issues, but there are issues in every place. At least if you can go in and consult face to face, you can thrash it out and say what the craic is. If there are, for example, 32 of them, you can ask why they are not getting it. What has been done or not done wrong? What can be done to fix what was wrong and work to progress it? This committee is committed. There are no politics on this committee, which is brilliant. Ms O'Donoghue mentioned there could be more than 100 children on that site alone who are not getting basic education, never mind washing, electricity, showers or whatever. Without singling out one in particular, I cannot understand how any council in 2023 can hide behind excuses. That is how I feel about the so-called submissions. People object for various reasons. However, as Deputy Stanton said, you should find out what they are, have that conversation and try to thrash it out.

A national campaign on racism was mentioned. I think we need a national campaign informing people of the Traveller tradition is, and why it seems different. If the normal Joe Soap is not willing to look outside the box they are not willing to change. If you are not willing to change, your normal reactive mode is defence. You defend yourself against whoever the opposition is, for example, the Traveller people. You do not want to sit and learn what their beliefs or traditions are. The Traveller mental health group was outside Leinster House during the week. I spoke to someone who is one of only two tinsmiths left. I told him that I worked in construction years ago, and our building site was beside a halting site in County Kildare. We had to bring specific timber up from County Cork, which was the only place you could get it. We arrived in the building site, parked the van and trailer, went for tea, came back and the timber was gone. I decided we needed a cunning plan. We went into the halting site and asked for who was in charge. We met them, and said we would need security for the following six months and they would get paid. We had that conversation, and it lasted less than one hour. We offered a deal. We would go for dinner and when we returned the timber would be back. We returned from dinner and the timber was back. That site did very well, and we benefited because we had the security. Why? We went in and talked to them face to face. We dealt with them in their own language, and respected their culture. I think that is one thing society is now missing; the culture associated with the Travelling community. I was proud to have a conversation with that man and told him I even sourced my own copper cylinder that time. A coal bucket was made for me, and I still have it. It is an amazing trade. The key is to get that information and understanding out to people. It will first take down the barriers so the conversation can be had. As Deputy Stanton also knows, there are a lot of Traveller families on the outskirts of Midleton.. It is absolutely brilliant and amazing. I could not say how many years they have been there but they all are integrated into society. One of the lads used to cut my hair, and the whole lot. They were given a chance and a listening ear.

I told the Chair a while back that I did not want this to be a talking shop. If we have to, we will bring in Cork City Council, Cork County Council, or any county council, and ask its representatives what is their immediate plan, their five-year plan and their ten-year plan. We do not want to be asking them for their 30-year plan. We know there are issues. We have spoken about going to Spring Lane and other places to say we need to get to the crux of this. We will not be there to judge anybody. We want to go in to assist councils and associations like those of our guests to do this as fast as we can but as appropriately as we can. We also want to get value for money. We will ask each and every family what their plan is and what they genuinely need. It might sound like massive work. Each family is very different, even though they might all be living in the same place. Some may not want to change and some might be open to change. However, if we are to get anything done through this committee, education and accommodation are the two key things. There will also be employment, but you cannot get into employment unless you have education. You will not have a chance at anything unless you have accommodation, because you need a postal address. It will have to go back to brass tacks very fast. I would love to see this committee have the ability to deliver what Ms O'Donoghue and others are saying should have been delivered 30 years ago. From Deputy Stanton's parliamentary question there is surely a justification for a jump from €12 million to €20 million in a short period. Why is it so expensive? Why is it taking so long?

This is not really a question to the witnesses. If they were on any other housing list, not part of a Traveller organisation, and were told as an applicant that they needed to put €40,000 down before applying for housing - I could not repeat the words here, but you know what you would be told. That is the beauty of this committee. People need to hear this. It is possibly discriminatory, because I cannot see it anywhere else in the country. If somebody came into my office and told me they wanted to go on the social housing list, and I told them I wanted €40,000 it would seem ludicrous. We will assist in any way we can. The witnesses should never be afraid to ask a stupid question. The stupid response is the problem we have to deal with. However, on this side of the room I guarantee the witnesses my full support in whatever they want to do. This needs to be done. The days of talking are over. If there are more than 100 children on that site alone, God knows how many families there are. The conditions are substandard. We know there are issues, but you can deal with them as well. The reason is that where there is an action, there is an instant reaction. We need to get that action removed, that is, the antisocial side of it, but you cannot have that unless you have harmony, and people happy and comfortable and so on. I will not take up any more time, but the witnesses should keep doing what they are doing. If we can help in any way, we certainly will.

Mr. John O'Sullivan

The Deputy asked a question relating to Ms Kelly's earlier point about the formation of an independent body to oversee the delivery of Traveller accommodation. Where does this committee feel that suggestion or recommendation is? I am a community development worker and have sat on consultative committees on accommodation for the past 15 years. I have seen accommodation plan after accommodation plan come and go. There is little accountability around whether the targets set out in those plans are met, to the frustration of all involved. We see the need. We are out on the ground, in and out of the sites and we see where people are at, their living conditions, and the basic rights being denied to children in terms of warmth and electricity. I remember working with a Traveller family and the father told me his children sometimes had to do their homework under a candle because the generator that powered their mobile home would work some days but not others. He told me it was an immense struggle for the children to have their homework done, or to have uniforms washed to go to school. As a community worker, I attend a consultative committee that I sometimes feel is a talking shop, with few outcomes. You get frustrated as a worker and a Traveller, when you go back to face the community when it is looking for results. It is looking for some sort of tangible outcome you can hang your hat on to show what has been achieved in the last plan, and that is where you are going. As the Deputy says, the time for talking has finished.

I can kind of answer that question. The recommendation for the Traveller authority around housing came from the expert group in 2019. It is also a recommendation of this committee. For the past 15 to 16 years I have been part of TAPs with the local Traveller accommodation consultative committees. We know better than anyone, Mr. O'Sullivan, that in the entire country, not one of those TAP programmes has worked.

You could be blue in the face writing in for them. Where is that recommendation? It is about trying to get it implemented. If it is not implemented, nobody will be held to account.

What we are doing as a committee is raising it and saying what Travellers want, pointing out that the answers are there and asking how we can implement them. We are trying our best to hold local authorities to account. One of our reasons for inviting in the Cork Traveller Visibility Group and the National Traveller Women's Forum is that we want to hear the problems, even though we already know them, in order that we can bring back the council and tell its representatives what we heard from the groups four or six weeks ago. That is the best answer I can give regarding the implementation of the authority.

Ms Kelly mentioned the repeal of the trespass legislation. That is also one of the recommendations of the committee and it is something we may lobby and campaign for with Travellers and Traveller organisations.

Ms Brigid Carmody

I agree with what everyone has said. Ms O'Donoghue, Mr. O'Sullivan and I have gone through at least four TAPs, so we welcome funding being pushed into Spring Lane to get it to this stage. Spring Lane is very much in the public eye, however, which means we have to get every area into the public eye to get any kind of real change for families. There are other areas and families in the city and we want the same emphasis to be put on other areas as is put on Spring Lane.

Ms Bridget Kelly

I thank the Deputy for his comments and agree with him. Education is very important for all our children, whether Traveller or settled. Nevertheless, due to the circumstances a lot of Traveller families are in, as we have all touched on, we could stay here for a month talking about the accommodation issues because things have got a lot worse for our community and it is at crisis point. I agree the accommodation issues need to be addressed urgently.

It is important there be a better understanding of Traveller culture. I do not think there is political will, and some local authorities are holding back on the delivery of Traveller accommodation. As we all outlined, we have seen year in, year out the failed delivery of targets within Traveller accommodation plans, which is having a negative impact on our community in regard to education. More Traveller children should be in education, but their living conditions prevent them from progressing in that regard.

Moreover, 82% of the Traveller community are unemployed at the moment. Those statistics are stark. There are myths out there suggesting Travellers do not want to work, but they do want to. Travellers want the same opportunities as anyone else. Likewise, with the mental health crisis, we see Traveller women living in appalling conditions and experiencing racism and discrimination daily for being a Traveller woman and for living in appalling living conditions, which has a detrimental effect on their mental health and well-being. Their suicide rates are 11 times higher than in the settled population.

Traveller accommodation needs to be addressed and the Minister needs to take a leadership role and deliver on it. I know the Department will say it has exceeded the Traveller accommodation budget, but when we ask for a breakdown of how many new builds of Traveller-specific accommodation have been delivered, we cannot get an answer because there are no new builds of Traveller-specific accommodation. The Department seems to be zoning in on the existing sites that have been there for years and are being refurbished, and on social housing. Some Traveller families want to live in social housing but there are other Traveller families who, if they were being given a mansion on a hill, would not want it because they want to live on a site or in a bay. That is their belief, and if that is where they want to live, that is their choice. The local authorities should be open to that and they need to wake up and start providing Traveller accommodation. As I said, the Minister needs to take the lead on this. Until such time as the targets are implemented, we will not see change. Even so, we are not going to give up and we will keep fighting.

This relates to the delivery of the 32 recommendations under the expert group.

Ms Bridget Kelly

Yes. I also sit on the programme board as the National Traveller Women's Forum representative, and with Pavee Point and the Irish Traveller Movement. Bernard Joyce is on it as well. We have been doing a lot of work on the programme board's recommendations, of which there are 32. To date, ten of those recommendations have been implemented, but they are very small and are only the tip of the iceberg of what needs to be done to address the Traveller accommodation crisis for our community. One of them relates to an ethnic identifier. That recommendation went on for almost a year to try to get it. To me, it seems to be little but to the Department, it was a big thing. In any event, the Traveller identifier, as it is called, is now used on social housing application forms.

As I touched on earlier, some work has been done on collaboration with the census office and so on, but where we need to see real change is with a national Traveller accommodation authority, which Mr. O'Sullivan and Ms O'Shea mentioned. The function needs to be taken away from local authorities because for years they have failed the Traveller community when it comes to the delivery of Traveller accommodation. The only way we are going to see change is when that authority has been put in place. It needs to be driven by Travellers, in collaboration with the Minister and whoever else, but it really needs to be moved on. We are at the early stages of talking about that at the moment.

Another recommendation relates to Part 8 of the planning Act, which definitely needs to happen. As we know and as I have experienced at a local level, along with everyone else here who represents Traveller organisations and the community, we have seen that even though the funding is there and the local authority would locate somewhere where a specific site could go, when it comes to Part 8 some councillors seek to block Traveller accommodation. We need that power to be removed from councillors to ensure Part 8 will get over the line. I am not sure whether that is an issue for Spring Lane at the moment-----

Mr. John O'Sullivan

It is, but it will have to go through Part 8.

Ms Bridget Kelly

I know that in some areas, the funding and the location for a site were there, and when it came to Part 8, it was dead in the water.

The biggest challenge with the redevelopment of Traveller accommodation sites is Part 8. Labre Park, similar to Spring Lane, has been waiting to get through Part 8 for more than a decade. I have no doubt that if we do not keep on top of Spring Lane, we will still be at Part 8. The recommendations we are talking about today, which both organisations have again brought to the committee's attention, relate to the authority for Traveller accommodation, which was a recommendation from this committee and other groups. It is important that be actioned.

I apologise for not being in the committee room but I was listening remotely to the presentations on my way into the House. I thank the witnesses for attending and for their presentations. I can hear the desperation and I am well aware of the conditions, especially in my area. It is not only about Traveller accommodation but also about its maintenance. Do the witnesses know of any local authority that is implementing the TAPs successfully?

Have the witnesses heard of any local authority that we could look at which is doing the work it is supposed to do?

I have another question for the ladies in particular. They spoke a lot about discrimination towards Traveller women, particularly those looking for housing. Could they give us an example of some of the cases, without identifying people, that they came across in their time?

Ms Bridget Kelly

I thank the Deputy for her questions. On the Traveller accommodation plans, while I could stand corrected, I cannot say that there is a local authority which has fully implemented a Traveller accommodation plan. As I said, I could stand corrected and I cannot give a certain answer. From our work and linking in with our local members, which include more than 30 Traveller organisations, I know that similar concerns come up across the board about failure to deliver on the Traveller accommodation plans. We see significant increases in homeless Traveller families, who are staying much longer in homeless services.

We also see that some people are finding it hard to access private rented accommodation. The housing assistance payment seems to be a way of housing Travellers at the moment but that is not the solution. As I said earlier, some families want to live in housing and we have families who do not want to live in housing. When families look for private rented accommodation, then because of their identity, they find it hard to get the accommodation. They experience racism and discrimination. That includes Traveller women too. I was an accommodation worker with the Galway Traveller Movement. I worked first-hand with many families in Galway city on accommodation. I witnessed some of these women trying to get private rented accommodation. The landlords are cute in how they go about it, since they will not say it is because people are Travellers, but the women with families know it is. Indirect discrimination is going on too.

As I said earlier, Traveller women experience racism and discrimination, particularly in accessing pubs, restaurants and hotels, as well as in trying to access private rented accommodation. That is the reality for us. It is having a negative impact on Traveller women, men and young children. Racism and discrimination need to be challenged. The recent riot in Dublin should not have happened and it involved racism and discrimination. We have been pushing around the hate Bill. It is important that the Government moves on that because it is the only way we will see racism and discrimination addressed for the Traveller community and for all other ethnic minority and vulnerable groups that experience racism and discrimination.

Ms Breda O'Donoghue

I will address one or two of the issues that Deputy Mitchell raised about good practice around the country. As Ms Kelly from the National Traveller Women's Forum mentioned, we have quite a good network of Traveller organisations around the country. The majority of the stories are very similar. I know there is good practice in some areas. I know, for example, that it is 24 years since I visited Dublin city with local representatives from Cork city and council officials. We looked at some good quality Traveller halting sites in certain areas. Do not ask me to name the areas because I would not have a clue, but I know we saw them and they were working well.

I also know that in the UK, things are very different for Travellers. I know that Travellers have been accepted for much longer there as an ethnic minority group than we have been here in this country. The problem for us is that local authorities are the only show in town for Travellers. Traveller culture is about living within the extended family. When Travellers' families try to come together to purchase a small piece of land that they can develop into a space where they could set up bays and have their own mobile homes, though I would not call it a halting site, that is blocked from every angle. Many Travellers have gone to court and been refused planning permission simply because they are Travellers. Through the Covid pandemic, we saw pop-up homes everywhere, with people building at the back of their own houses for younger family members or moving into them themselves and renting their homes. We see that everywhere we go but not with Travellers. We, for some reason, are not allowed to even progress our own accommodation. We are blocked everywhere.

Deputy Mitchell mentioned discrimination against women. Traveller women in general have been suffering. It is a double whammy for Traveller women because we are women and we are Travellers on top of that. We work with many Traveller women who suffer from domestic violence. I want to be clear when I say that domestic violence is not now and never has been part of Traveller culture but it is prevalent in our community, as it is across the board. Unfortunately, when it comes to domestic violence, the majority of Traveller women are expected to police themselves. If I live on a site and call the guards into a domestic violence situation, the garda does not come to me straightaway. He will go around and check people's cars for tax, who has a broken tail-light and what somebody has in a shed before he comes to me. I then get it from both sides. I get it from my own community because I drew the guards in and people got a ticket because they did not have tax, or other things happened. I am probably going to be asked if that is not my culture and it will be implied that we take care of those things ourselves. That puts women in extreme danger.

Deputy Mitchell talked about domestic violence centres that discriminate against Travellers. If I rock up to a domestic violence centre and there is another Traveller in that centre, I am refused access in most cases because only one Traveller family is allowed at a time. We have been told this over the years. There is discrimination right across the board for Travellers. We have been working for the last couple of months with a young Traveller woman who has seven children and was suffering from domestic violence. She was moved from one county to the next and tossed between Cork City Council and Kerry County Council. Last month, we told her to go home because there was nothing we could do for her. She was bounced from one county to the next because she had, as they called it, "voluntarily" given up her home, having left a situation that she could no longer stay in because she was afraid for her life. She could not be accommodated in Cork either through the emergency services or the local authority because she was not from the area. That is what is going on on the ground for Traveller women and when it comes to Travellers trying to access accommodation in any county around the country. I am probably coming across very strongly here but when you deal with these families on the ground for so long and see so little change, it affects you in different ways.

I thank Ms O'Donoghue. I know about this from the work we do and from the National Traveller Women's Forum, which is doing its best to get Traveller women access to refuges if needs be, including providing locations of refuges. This is not to say that Ms O'Donoghue is wrong. Far from it, but I think that Clúid Housing has taken over some sites and there is some good practice with the likes of Clúid Housing. When it comes to local authorities, speaking as a professional community development worker who has worked on the ground with Travellers, I have seen very little good practice, but I have seen barriers that Travellers have to face daily when it comes to accommodation. The proof is in the pudding. We have had these Traveller accommodation programmes for decades and they have not worked. That needs to change.

The witnesses talked about maintenance. I think it is a critical question. I should not say this because I am Chair of the committee. It is a bit like having a radiator fixed, signing a form, then the radiator breaking because good quality materials are not put into Traveller accommodation in my experience of living on a halting site. I would like if the witnesses could touch on maintenance because it is so important. I have seen cases where new windows are needed because they are years old, then another is needed next year, because it is such poor quality. That is expected in Traveller accommodation.

Would any of the witnesses like to answer the Deputy's question on maintenance?

Mr. John O'Sullivan

In our area, maintenance comes up regularly at LTACC. We only had a meeting yesterday with the local authority. It raised the issue of the expense that tenders come in at. It is astronomical for Traveller accommodation. When a contractor has to go onto site it is as though a premium is put on the quote and the level of work is questionable sometimes. We had a new development in Cork about 20 years ago. I remember liaising with the families down there. Handles broke off the widows after a couple of weeks. There were issues like that and with drains. Repairs on Traveller accommodation are constant. An effective estate management structure is part of that problem. There need to be regular meetings where issues can be logged. I remember attending estate management meetings where there were backlogs of maintenance of repair issues for years. Only yesterday at that meeting, the TAU in Cork told us it does not have a designated works team to fix Traveller accommodation issues. They are logged with the teams in the local authority. If it is a specific job, it has to tender for it and when it tenders there is a premium on the work needed to fix the issues.

Ms Bridget Kelly

Following on from the point about maintenance, it is something that arises in sites. We have noticed how some families have to wait months, and even years like John said, to get some of the repairs or maintenance issues sorted. That is a big issue for our Traveller families. Some sites have caretakers who take up the responsibilities of their roles but in other areas the caretakers there are not fulfilling their responsibilities. That is also an issue across the board. If there are maintenance issues on a site, as John said, the local authorities have to go to tender. They say is will cost a certain amount and it must apply for funding even though there is a Traveller accommodation budget there, they seem to draw it out. It is the families living on the sites with maintenance issues who I feel sorry for. They might be problems with heating or hot water. One particular family I have worked with in the past had to wait a year for the shower to be fixed and have the hot water restored. It is a big issue for the community and something that needs to be resolved.

If you take the maintenance money out of Traveller accommodation budget, they could spend hundreds of thousands of euro on repairs on sites. These could include kitchens that would not be put into settled people’s houses but it is okay to put them into Traveller homes. At yesterday’s disability committee, I spoke about children and people with disabilities. To give an example, 23 years ago I was in an accident. OTs came out to make the house fit for purpose and, even today, we are yet to get the shower that we were promised. That is just a little insight into the kind of waiting. It is about being fit for purpose. I can talk on behalf of Labre Park but it is no different in Cork. It is a lot of money for equipment and work that, in my opinion, is not fit for purpose. The heating is absolutely appalling. We had a Minister of State out in Labre Park. He could not believe his eyes. Earlier Deputy Buckley spoke about going onto halting sites. As a committee, we see that as a waste of our time because the previous committee had visited sites. We did not want to go out and visit and talk and say “Ah, the poor Travellers,” and then walk away from the sites and not be able to do much. If we can get some action for the committee then we can go onto sites.

When it comes to repairs, I could not let it pass without answering the question. Something this committee needs to look at around accommodation is the standard of repairs for Traveller accommodation.

I raised that because in my own constituency, that seems to be one of the main issues about which I am being contacted by the Traveller community. As the Cathaoirleach said, it is kitchens, leaks, back doors not closing and it all seems to be left on the never-never. It is something that the committee can look at with councils.

Ms Carmody wanted to come in.

Ms Brigid Carmody

I also want to touch on maintenance and delays to maintenance. We work with some families who do not have their mobile homes connected to water or heating. One particular family has a mobile home that has not been connected in six to eight months. If a family takes out a €40,000 loan through the caravan loan scheme and it is not connected up to heating, and in this weather the damp will be setting in, the caravans do not last the length of the loan because they start rotting before they are paid off. People are waiting six to eight months to get heating and water into a mobile home. There seem to be very long delays getting plumbers and electricians out to connect caravans and that is a real concern.

Mr. John O'Sullivan

I wanted to raise a question around the Housing (Traveller Accommodation) Act itself. Having been a member of a local consultative committee for over 15 years, I would have seen the blockages over the years and the frustrations. I have heard the talk of independent agencies to oversee Traveller accommodation as a need from the community. However on the Act itself and how it was set up, would there be a feeling in the room that it is outdated? I would have sat around and heard people talk about the frustrations that come from the failures of the Traveller accommodation plans and how the consultative committees themselves need to be functioning committees. The minutes from those committees need to go to full housing. Sometimes they feel like a talking shop. You wonder being a Traveller and being an advocate for Travellers in those committees, do the minutes go anywhere? Do they make it past those committees. In the delivery of Traveller accommodation going forward, is there a need for the Act to be ripped up and to start again?

I think that is a very important question. It will require a consultation with the national and local organisations. An Act is just an Act; it does not have to be acted on, if that makes sense. A review of the Traveller accommodation Act would be something that would benefit the Traveller community but while we review these Acts, we are taking our eyes off the ball of implementation of what we are asking for now. I think it is important that the Traveller organisations look at that and speak to the community. As a member of the Traveller community, I do not think the Act is fit for purpose. It obviously needs to be updated and more. The trespass legislation also needs to be repealed. The Act contains some good recommendations but they were never acted upon, as it were. A review is something that is needed, but that is my feeling. I do not know about other members.

In case our guests are losing hope when they are talking about talking shops, everyone here has been a breath of fresh air. They have been fine and blunt. I like that. There was no mincing words; they all threw it up on the table and that is now on the record. There are people here and media that watches this stuff. The way our guests are talking is the way it should be said.

The caravan loan scheme is just not fit for purpose. It does not make sense and it is not working. As John says, 32 families in Cork are on a waiting list for the scheme.

It just does not make sense. The witnesses spoke about talking shops and committees and implementing things. One thing we are very strong about here is accountability and responsibility. We are going to have to make people listen. It is their job, but a person may be failing at his or her job. If a person did not turn up on Monday for five weeks on a construction job, he or she would be sacked. Somebody has the responsibility to do that because he or she has been given that responsibility. We are trying to get positive results as fast as we can to show that things can change when the political will is there, but also the political backing that goes all the way down to local councils. Somebody in the local council has to be responsible. We do not know whether they are getting the full backing of,l say, management or senior management within those councils. I have worked on councils. In fairness to them, the majority of people are really genuine, but they are restricted as well. I do not know whether it is a policy issue. This committee has the power to make policy change. We also have the power to call in any local authority and put the questions the witnesses want to them to ask why X is not being done, why it has not been done, who is responsible for it, who will take ownership of it now and whether people can be given a timeline on when things will change. We can do that, but it is only by working together that we will be able to do it. That is why I find this very beneficial. I am very frustrated about it. As Ms O'Donoghue said, we could be here for hours.

I have worked with settled Travellers who live on housing estates and with families who have been touched with autism. Despite that fact that they are very grateful to have a council house, even those houses are not fit for purpose. Children are dropping out the top windows of two-storey houses when they should not be in a two-storey house. It is by the witnesses coming to this committee and throwing the story out on the table that we now have the information to go back and ask those hard questions and ask people not to give us excuses anymore but tell us why it is not being done. I would like to keep in contact with the witnesses because the more I listen in this committee, the more frustrated and angry I get. We know the solutions are there, and pardon the term, but I think people out there do not have the cojones to take the responsibility to change.

When we speak to people like Mr. O'Sullivan, Ms Carmody, Ms Kelly and Ms O'Donoghue, we hear about people waiting on the TAP for decades. It is still as if we are in a worse place to what we were when we started and when the Act around Traveller accommodation was put together. That is absolutely heartbreaking for the community as a whole. Accommodation is everything. Accommodation is your education, health, well-being, etc.

I have a few remarks and questions. What really strikes me about Spring Lane and Cork is the No End in Sight report. That got absolutely amazing coverage all over the media. It spoke about the poor Traveller children and how to proceed, but what about the recommendations? What were the implementations? What was implemented from it? Do the witnesses know what was implemented from the ombudsman's recommendations around Spring Lane?

Ms Kelly spoke about the review of the Traveller trailer scheme. I do not know any Traveller who calls it a caravan. We call them trailers. We are seeking to change that word to trailers because it is important. Why should we have to change our slang or language because it looks better on paper? We know the Traveller trailer scheme is not working. What is the purpose of doing the review? Would that again kick the can down the road? That is one of my questions to the witnesses along with that on the No End in Sight report.

I will mention the living conditions on one of the halting sites in Cork. We are not allowed to name it because it was not named in the report, but we all know the site. A child fell and ended up in the local hospital with an infection in his skin. Yesterday, at the Joint Committee on Disability Matters at which we discussed housing and so forth, I spoke about how this is not just a person's house; it is his or her environment as well. It is the environment in which a person is living. It is about those recommendations. Mr. O'Sullivan gave us some ideas on Travellers themselves through NGOs and a review of the Housing (Traveller Accommodation) Act, which is really important. I thank him for that. Do the witnesses have any final comments? They might answer those two questions I put to them about the review of the caravan loan scheme and the No End in Sight report.

Ms Breda O'Donoghue

I will come in on the caravan loan scheme. Both organisations have discussed this. We are caught between a rock and a hard place in that we do not want the scheme. We think it is discriminating against families. There are families in dire need, however. Let us be honest: nobody wants to take out a €40,000 loan to accommodate themselves. I believe it should be scrapped and we should look at a rental scheme. That would be my first impression of it. It is not working and there are not enough loans to meet the need anyway even if it was working. Therefore, rather than a review, I would like to see it just scrapped and for us to relook at another option.

Ms Bridget Kelly

With regard to the Cathaoirleach's question, we would have consultation with our members about the caravan loan scheme. That was with all our members. There was huge discussion of the issues that had arisen out of the caravan loan scheme. It was not just the National Traveller Women's Forum saying that we wanted an independent review. We were in consultation with all our members and it was our members who said let us call for an independent review of the caravan loan scheme because of all the issues that came up today. There are other members who would add more to the issues that are arising with the scheme. That is why we called for the independent review. We do not know whether it is going to happen. They are looking at doing it, but I know what people have said here today regarding the caravan loan scheme. While it does not suit some, it does suit others. The review will bring all that up and then coming out of the review, maybe the Department then will say let us scrap it and look at the rental scheme. However, that is what we brought to the table based on what we were told. We consulted with our members and that is what we were asked to bring.

A review is important. Next week, representatives from National Traveller MABS, which really is the leading body, will appear before the committee.

Ms Bridget Kelly

That is an important point. I acknowledge all the work that National Traveller MABS has done on the caravan loan scheme. In particular, it has done huge research with regard to the quality of mobile homes. If any TDs would like that information, we can send that over. It is important to acknowledge its work as well.

The caravan loan scheme has helped on some of the halting sites in Dublin,. I agree with what Ms O'Donoghue said but before we think about scrapping this, it has supported families. It is not many families but some families were brought to an emergency home who now would probably be on the streets or in a hostel if they did not have the scheme. Again, however, Ms O'Donoghue is 100% right. We have to look at what is best to do and whether we can put something else in place. They are really big questions that we are not going to solve today.

It will be interesting to hear what National Traveller MABS has to say next week about how it is working or not working and the research it has done. We work really closely with National Traveller MABS. The future-proofing of Traveller accommodation around retrofitting for trailers and houses for Travellers is something this committee also has to look at when it comes to accommodation. We did touch on it in some of our private sessions too. I will just mention that.

Next week, representatives from Cena, which is a Traveller-led organisation around Traveller accommodation, will also appear before the committee.

It is a housing body. We are looking forward to that next week. We will also have Pavee Point Traveller and Roma Centre in next week. This committee is looking at including the Roma community around accommodation too, which is important. Are there any other comments from members or from our guests?

Mr. John O'Sullivan

In relation to the caravan loan scheme, caravans and, as was mentioned earlier, trailers, by nature, are used in the summer months. Travellers are the only group that use them all-year round. They are not fit for purpose all-year round. They do not last. When we talk about the caravan loan scheme, I would like to see something like a modular home looked at.

Yes. We were talking about that last week.

Mr. John O'Sullivan

Down the road, it could be a loan scheme. There was a huge development in Cork recently by the Office of Public Works for Ukrainian families. The figure came in at approximately €165,000 for a modular home that houses an individual family and they are fantastic. Traveller families, if they had an option of a good-quality decent warm home, would gladly pay a rent every week for it. It is a more sustainable and viable option going forward than, and going back to Ms Kelly's point, the caravan not out-seeing the €40,000 loan. A more sustainable option needs to be looked at. If it is a figure like €165,000 that needs to be looked at, Travellers would gladly contribute towards that in terms of rent and it would pay for itself over a period of time. Those have a 50-year lifespan.

I welcome what Ms Kelly said earlier - we said it last week as well - and what Mr. O'Sullivan brought up there around different types of accommodation. They are like chalets. That is what we would call the sort of accommodation that we have seen lately in Ireland. It is important that we give people choices. Many members of our community, as Ms Kelly said, would not live in a mansion on a hill and would like to live in a trailer in a halting site. It is about that choice of accommodation. It is important that people have that choice.

On what Ms O'Donoghue said, does it need to be scrapped? This is the first time that question has arisen at this committee. It is question we will put to MABS next week. It is a wider question around the review as well. It is important. Does Ms O'Shea want to add something?

Ms Eileen O'Shea

In terms of the No End in Site report and Spring Lane, work is taking place on Spring Lane. It is very slow and there is a number of reasons for that. The local authority is working with the Ombudsman and delivering updates on the recommendations. They meet with ourselves quite regularly.

As to whether there is much change on the ground right now, there is not. It is slow work. There is some electrics work that is happening that will improve some things, but it is very slow. One of the issues is construction and getting contractors in. I would expect that the increase in budget there is to do with pricing and the colossal rates that we are charged when looking at Traveller accommodation.

I expect that across Ireland there were many Travellers living in overcrowded accommodation on sites who said that was their story. While local authorities have a huge responsibility to pay, we have to look at the Department. If it is failing everywhere across Ireland, it is not only a local authority matter. It is the Department's matter and the Minister's matter.

One hundred per cent. It is up to the Government to hold the local authorities to account. That is the whole point. It is that accountability. One would be blue in the face hearing that it is okay because it is only the Travellers. There is nothing in place that will protect Travellers from the lack of implementation by the State, by local authorities.

We have seen politicians and Ministers who got elected on the back of anti-Traveller. Something important that was mentioned earlier was a campaign around racism and discrimination. I have been part of campaigns around Traveller racism and discrimination since I was very young and I am now 34 years of age. We have done enough campaigning around it. Now it is about, as Ms O'Shea said, the hate crime legislation to start off with and trying to break down those barriers and the casual racism that Travellers suffer from the State and from wider society. As someone who is in here as a member of the Traveller community, I have been looking at how can we hold the State to account where it is not acceptable not to drawdown the funding for Traveller accommodation and, most importantly, not to implement the recommendations that organisations and individuals within our community have worked on for many a decade. It is all well and good saying that it is the local authority, but it is the political will. It is all cross-over.

There is mental health, housing and education as well. I am meeting with the Minister, Deputy Foley, next Friday. I have been waiting three months for that meeting around the reduced timetables for Travellers in school to take place. There are many burning issues for which the answers are already there.

Cork Traveller Visibility Group has worked for decades on the answers, and so too has the National Traveller Women's Forum, Pavee Point and ITM. The list of organisations is as long as your arm. The answers are there but it is that accountability and implementation that this committee is looking for.

We could move on and talk about Travellers in the justice system, for example. That is something that we want to look at as a committee but we know that we cannot even touch on that until nearer the summer because there are so many recommendations that we are trying to push to be implemented. Why start something new when one has 84 recommendations that need to be pushed and implemented? That is what this committee does.

Ms Eileen O'Shea

I would say Ms Carmody, Ms O'Donoghue, Mr. O'Sullivan and everyone here is probably blue in the face campaigning. It should not be the responsibility of Traveller organisations and the Traveller community. At this stage, it is more of a public health issue in terms of the mental health of over 40,000 to 50,000 citizens of Ireland. We demand support from a national campaign led by the State. This Bill, the Traveller culture and history Bill, is one of those that is such a part of it but, as we said earlier to the former Minister of State, Deputy Stanton, it is a collective approach and it has to be led from the top. I often use the example of the anti-smoking campaign. With the intent, things can change. We can change minds very positively with the will but it has to be collective and to come from the top.

I thank our guests and the organisations for coming in today. I know everyone is very tired. It is a bit like a broken record but, hopefully, we can get some action by pushing this through. I thank the members of the committee because it is important to have questions asked by members and that it is not only somebody from our community who is pushing it. As I said, we will have Cena, Pavee Point and National Traveller MABS in next week.

The joint committee adjourned at 12.09 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 14 December 2023.
Barr
Roinn