There are three EU legislative proposals for discussion. No. 1.1 COM (2011) 555 in members' EU briefing is a draft directive on the minimum level of training for seafarers. The Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport is the lead Department. This draft directive seeks to amend the existing EU directive on the training of seafarers, in line with recently updated international rules. Changes to international rules set out in the IMO's Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, STCW Convention, were adopted in Manila in 2010. This directive aims to incorporate the provisions of the Manila amendments into EU law and includes two additional requirements which are not part of the Manila amendments. These are an extension of the deadline for the Commission to recognise the systems of training and the certification of seafarers of third countries from three to 18 months, and the introduction of a requirement on member states to provide standardised information to the Commission for the purpose of statistical analysis. All member states, including Ireland, are party to the STCW Convention and all previous amendments to it have been transposed into EU law by means of directives.
While the transposition into EU law of standards already agreed to in the context of an international agreement is welcome, in its information note the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport confirmed that some member states, including Ireland, have expressed reservations about the transmission of seafarer statistics and details to the Commission. Concerns are based on the view that systems to record and collate this data are not sufficiently well-developed and that there is insufficient assurance about the intended use of the data or the ownership of same after transmission.
It is proposed, in light of the concerns indicated by the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport, that an update on the proposal should be requested for consideration by the committee in November-December to ascertain if the concerns have been adequately addressed. Is that agreed?