Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 24 Jul 1924

Vol. 3 No. 16

SEANAD IN COMMITTEE. - RE-AFFORESTATION OF IRELAND.

I move:—

"That in the opinion of the Seanad it is urgent that the Government shall take effective measures this year to promote the re-afforestation of Ireland in order to stimulate rural industry and to increase the production of fuel and fruit and of timber for wood-workers, etc."

This project comes also to meet the demand for employment. There is ample opportunity and great urgency for this measure, because first with regard to fuel, this country is subject to a wet period during which the ordinary fuel of the country, peat, is injured. Now the rain which injures the peat fuel would increase the growth of the wood fuel. Then, besides, let it be remembered that all over the Continent nations subsist largely upon the effects of wood fuel. In France, Spain, Italy, Germany and elsewhere, wood is the common fuel. In Ireland that also should be the case. In ancient times Ireland was "an island of woods," and was well wooded, but subsequently the invaders destroyed these woods partly owing to exploitation by adventurers, who sold the wood as staves to England and made fortunes from the ruin of the forests of Ireland. All the fuel would appear not merely in the form of sectional pieces of branches and of young trees but also in the form of charcoal, of which large quantities are furnished, for instance, in France and elsewhere, to the cities, and as a consequence the air of these cities is clearer than that of those which burn only coal, and, therefore, more healthy. In the woods, such as in the Black Forest of Germany and in the woods of Norway, local industries are carried on. Wooden toys are made in the houses of dwellers in the woods, and in Norway a great output of artistic wooden utensils takes place. These things, if made, would succeed in Ireland, for of old the Irish were famous for their woodwork, and Irish emigrants to foreign countries, such as to France, carried with them that power and Irish woodwork was famous all over the Continent.

Now, with regard to the next point, that is fruit-growing, that has been strangely neglected all over this country. In some counties, such as Kilkenny and Wexford, there has been a temporary improvement within recent years, but it has been very little encouraged in other parts. There are large portions of the country well fitted for the growth of fruit trees, but they are totally neglected. With the growing of fruit I would include also such articles as nuts and so forth, to which portions of the South of France are largely given up, and to which large portions of Ireland might with profit be adapted. Not only should we consider fruit as valuable for man, but also as valuable for birds. On the Taurus Mountains I was struck with the rowan trees on the roads and on the hillsides, which I was informed were specially for providing fruit for the birds, and that was not merely to feed the birds out of philanthropic notions, but to prevent them from preying upon the crops. That was a matter of good economy and should not be neglected in this country. I have opened the craws of wild pigeons, and I have found them completely filled with fruit from those weeds instead of with corn. The wild pigeons in the woods near Bordeaux, which are treated as articles of commerce, find their food in the woods and in the neighbouring hills there. Then again you have to choose the right kind of trees because certain trees are more suitable for fuel than others. Then there are the great pine forests which furnish in certain cases turpentine and that not merely by bleeding the trees, as is generally done, but by driving steam through them, as is done in the forest near Bordeaux. Formerly that territory was largely a waste, and the population generally had to go on stilts because the soil was not serviceable for pedestrianism. Now these places are sandy, and there are sand-hills which are still called dunes, where the sand blew inland and covered the wastes. I have been there and found that that is all completely reformed and that the sandy hills are changed and grow furze and small bush plants, and on other grounds, they grow pines and trees of that sort.

You have there flourishing forests which were formerly nothing but waste. It may be of interest to know that in these forests there is a compliment to Ireland, because there are vast avenues cut through them in order to prevent any fire from running through the woods, and one avenue receives the name of Avenue Corrigan from the late Sir Dominick Corrigan, an Irishman of note abroad as well as at home. These woods now flourish where, as I say, there was complete waste. I think there should be some effort made to test the possibility of growing certain medicinal herbs and trees in this country besides what nature provides, and nature has provided a number of very important ones, such as the digitalis, which are not used in this country. We buy from foreign lands what we might grow and use at home. There is the eucalyptus tree, known as an Australian tree, growing in the Campagna at Rome for the purposes of sanitation, and I have seen it growing in the demesne of the late Mr. Richard Mahony at Dromore, near Kenmare. It flourished there in the winters which sometimes killed it elsewhere. In ancient times every physician had his lúb-gortín or herb garden. Medicinal herbs were cultivated throughout the country and were known, but now, of course, chemistry has superseded the cruder products by obtaining the minuter alkaloids and the essential medicinal ingredients and they have become more advantageous and more acceptable. That could be done by science in Ireland. That nearly concludes all I have to say upon this subject with this exception, that it is, I think, extremely important that effective measures should be taken this year to prepare and plant such forests. I have seen in the North of Ireland in Innishowen, on the Swilly side, large tracts of sand such as I have seen near the Gulf of Gascony. I have also seen them on the west coast of Donegal and Connaught, notably in the Louisburgh peninsula from Clew Bay to the Killeries and also off the coast of Kerry at Inny strand. There are large tracts of sand there, of which we have some specimens not far off, which might be cultivated quite as well as the sands on the Gulf of Gascony or in the Bay of Biscay in the South of Bordeaux. If this is left over for this year it means the loss of another complete year and, perhaps, the loss of two years. Therefore I would suggest that the Seanad do accept this motion and declare that it is considered urgent that such measures to promote the replantation of Ireland shall be taken this year.

I beg to second the motion. I think one of the most dreary characteristics of the greater part of the Irish countryside is the almost treeless character of the landscape. This is particularly true of the parts of the West of Ireland like Connemara where the land is eminently fitted for forestry. In the wooded areas, the position has become exceedingly disimproved since the war. The scarcity of timber, particularly imported timber, and the high prices obtained for it, caused a wholesale onslaught to be made on the woods in this country. In Connemara something amounting to vandalism has taken place in the cutting down of trees and nobody seems to bother to plant trees in the place of those cut down. The Ackland Committee appointed by the British Government in 1917 on afforestation gave a series of interesting figures one series of which went to show that Ireland was the worst wooded country in Western Europe. In England and Wales the percentage of the total area under wood was 5.1, in Scotland, 4.5, in Sweden, 47.6, in Russia, 37, in the German Empire, 25.9, Norway, 21, France, 18.2, Belgium, 17.7, Denmark, 6.3, Portugal, 3.5, and Ireland, 1.4. Only 1.4 of the total area is under timber in Ireland, and that notwithstanding the fact that there is so much waste land and moorland, eminently suitable for forestry. The effect of forests upon the appearance of the country as compared with stretches of barren land is incomparable. Their effect upon the climate is very great as Senator Dr. Sigerson pointed out some time ago, and their effect upon the national wealth of the country is something that could hardly be calculated. This was found with great effect during the period of the war when it was so difficult to get imported timber particularly owing to the submarine peril and the huge demand there was for timber during the war. At present there is a growing demand for timber per head of the population. In 1851 the normal demand for timber was 3.5 feet per head of the population per annum, and in 1911 it had grown to 10.5 feet per head of the population per annum. That with a growing population makes it necessary that the world's supplies of timber should be on the increase. The war had its effect upon the forests in Norway, Sweden and Russia just as here. There was a great demand for timber, prices were high and labour was somewhat scarce while very little discrimination was used in the destruction of these forests so that it will take a considerable time before they are back to their pre-war value.

Of the timber required in Great Britain and Ireland eight per cent. is found at home and 92 per cent. has to be imported. More is imported from Russia than all the other countries combined. If chaos obtained in Russia it is inevitable that the timber supply in this country would be affected. The Committee, in 1917, to which I have referred, recommended that efforts should be made to improve the forests. They pointed out that whereas the forests in Great Britain and Ireland produce 15 cubic feet of timber, Russia produced 53 cubic feet, and Baden produced 90 cubic feet, showing that Irish and British forests are inferior to other European forests. That Committee also recommended that the State should look after this question of afforestation. Here is one extract from the report: "It has only been within the last few years that forestry education has advanced sufficiently to impress on owners the advantages of modern methods. In this respect the absence of well-managed State forests has proved a great drawback, since the private owner has had no ideal towards which to work and has had to seek abroad his information on scientific management." Speaking of the improvement effected in the forests of Dean and Tintern since they have been taken over by the State, the report adds: "A visit to the woods which we have referred to should go a long way to disarm the criticism of those who doubt the ability of the State to conduct successful schemes of afforestation or provide effective management." If that is the case in Great Britain, I think it should be also the position here. There is no very great incentive for the private individual to embark on afforestation, because the income on it is very distant, and, as is stated in the report, he has no particular ideal to work for. The Irish farmer has certainly very few ideals in this respect. I know that where a few trees did exist, they were cut down to make ladder poles or firewood, or were thrown into gaps. Far from the number of trees being increased, I believe in recent years they have been considerably reduced. In the estimate of the Minister for Industry and Commerce, I was pleased to learn that something like 40,000 trees had been planted during the last year. This is a large number, but it is negligible as compared with the requirements, and I sincerely hope that the Minister, whose functions it will be to deal with this matter, will deal with it quickly, as has been asked for by the mover of the motion.

With reference to Senator O'Farrell's remark about the planting of 40,000 trees, as contractor for two counties, Clare and Tipperary, I may say that a quarter of a million trees were planted there each year. Compared with that, the planting of 40,000 is negligible.

Senator O'Farrell has pointed out that the forests are decreasing. They are decreasing to my knowledge, and have been for a number of years. Practically all the forests of Ireland have been planted by large landowners in former times. They may have been accused of many iniquities, but one of the things the landowners did do was to plant the trees. When they sold their lands the trees were cut down and not re-planted. That was to a great extent the fault of the State. When the State purchased an estate to divide up amongst the people, instead of preserving the lands, they would give no price for the trees. When the landowner asked the officials how much he would get for the trees, the answer was, "Nothing." They thought land was more valuable without the trees. What happened then was that the owner naturally cut down the trees before he sold his land, and sold them himself. Where he did not do that, I have seen the people near-by deliberately, for fear anybody else would take them from them, go round and ring the trees so that they would be no use. It is protection as much as planting that is required—protection of all trees. Going down to any of the stations in the West of Ireland, you will see piles and piles of trees being taken away.

Motion put and agreed to.
Barr
Roinn