I move:—
To delete all after the word "exercise" in line 14 and to substitute therefor the words "his right and authority to sit and act on the board of directors of the amalgamated company only when matters relating to the agreement between the London, Midland and Scottish Railway Company and the Dublin and South Eastern Railway Company come before the board for consideration.
The Bill now before the Seanad in virtue of certain concessions by the London, Midland and Scottish Railway to the Dublin and South Eastern Railway asks permission to allow for the nomination of a director on the board of the amalgamated company. When the Railways Bill, 1924, was passed, and a railway tribunal set up, those interested in railway matters in Ireland looked forward to a board of control of the railways which would act in harmony with the wishes and wants of the Irish people, one that would sympathise with the Irish Ireland movement and eliminate, if possible, Irish railways from English control. In 1904, when the first agreement was made with the Dublin, Wicklow and Wexford Company we understood that a condition of things existed then that does not exist now. Our exports were much in excess of our imports and therefore for the benefit of the country, to facilitate rapid transit and the transport of our goods it was necessary that an agreement of this kind should be entered into. For the last few years the balance is on the wrong side, our imports now exceeding our exports, so that the agreement entered into by those two railways has to be materially altered.
The Minister stresses a good deal the good business done in getting £20,000 yearly from the London, Midland and Scottish Railway brought into the funds of the new amalgamated company. I think the appointment of a director in consideration of this payment is setting a bad precedent. I might quote the remarks of President Wilson when he said: "The claim of foreign capital to get control of the vital interests of the country in which it is invested should be resisted the same as an invading army." That is a sound economic principle, and the experience of such a statesman should receive a great deal of consideration. The claim of foreign capital to control in any way vital concerns in this country should be resisted in the same way as an invading army.
With regard to the director who is to be appointed on the railway, it has been argued that one director out of sixteen would make very little difference. Under normal conditions, perhaps not, but we must remember on the new directorate of the amalgamated company, on looking over the list, we find that 85 per cent. of the directors are men who some years ago sympathised with English rule in Ireland,. Their outlook was English, and, therefore, a director with expert railway knowledge could, if he has plastic minds to work on, carry his own point when dealing with such men.
In bargaining with England or English companies, I think we should remember the celebrated Dr. Johnson's advice to an Irish friend. He said: "Do not unite with us; we will rob you." I think the same principle, applied in connection with railways, would be a very wise one. This new director will hold his position on this company in virtue of the concessions granted by the London and North Western Company to the Dublin South Eastern Company, and I think it would be only right his activities should be confined really to this line. The director, if appointed, will obviously hold his position through the connection with the Dublin, South Eastern Railway Company and the London, Midland and Scottish Railway Company, and it would be unreasonable that he should be allowed to interfere in the general management of all the railways in the Saorstát. To restrain this undue influence and to confine his activities to their legitimate sphere, is the purpose of my amendment.