Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 18 Jul 1933

Vol. 17 No. 5

Public Business. - Musk Rats Bill, 1933—Committee.

Sections 1 to 8 inclusive agreed to.
SECTION 9,
(1) It shall not be lawful for any person to keep in Saorstát Eireann any musk rat unless—

I move amendment 1:—

Section 9, sub-section (1). After the word "unless" in line 14 to insert the words "for the purpose of biological or scientific research and unless."

Any information I have about musk rats I got in the newspapers, and from the statement made by the Minister regarding the damage these animals do. Considering that we have some very valuable works, such as the Shannon scheme, convenient to where these rats were found, they should not be allowed into the country, except for the purpose of biological or scientific research. There appears to be great danger in allowing them into the Zoological Gardens or other places. I think the Seanad might agree to allow these animals in for the purpose of biological or scientific research. The Minister and his Department will be saved a great deal of worry if, when people seek licences to bring them in he could point out that the law had been changed and that these rats were only allowed in for research purposes. Consequently I move the amendment.

From what I have heard, there are a number of these animals loose about the country. They are a pest and a great danger and, under no circumstances, should they be allowed in. They should be barred from the country. I know that the Minister will do his best, by regulation and otherwise, to keep them under strict control but I do not believe that that is possible. If they are brought into the country, they will get loose somehow, as they have got loose in other countries. No country has been able to keep them locked up. I should go further than Senator Counihan and refuse to allow them into the country at all.

It appears to me that this amendment will not serve the purpose the Senator desires. If the section is retained as it stands, there is the possibility, as the Minister pointed out on the last occasion, that musk rats will be allowed in for the purpose of studying means of excluding them effectively and of destroying those that are here. To insert the amendment would not add anything to the strength of the section because anybody could bring in musk rats provided he said they were for biological research and got a licence. A boy who breeds rabbits could maintain that he was engaged in biological research.

He would have to get a licence to import musk rats.

He would have to get a licence in any case. I think that the Minister's purpose, as explained here, was to study means of exterminating these rats and, with a view to that, to permit their import under licence.

Why not put that in the Bill?

I am not objecting to the purpose the Senator has in mind, but the amendment will not, I think, be sufficient to achieve that purpose.

I think that Senator Counihan and Senator Colonel Moore are perfectly right. What we want to do is to keep the musk rat out of the country altogether. To effect that, I think it would be necessary to take out a whole of the first part of Section 9 and make it an offence to keep any musk rat. I do not think that anybody wants the musk rat brought into this country for any purpose whatever. Senator Counihan's motion does not go far enough. We ought to alter the section so that nobody can bring a musk rat into the country under any conditions. If science maintains that it is going to be terribly injured by that course, let the scientists put up a case and let the Minister bring in a special Bill under which musk rats will be admitted for scientific purposes. So far as this Bill is concerned, we should do everything possible to keep musk rats out of the country.

I support the view of Senator Jameson. I happen to know the district in which these musk rats have appeared and there is a strong objection on the part of the people there to their being allowed in under any circumstances. The way to prevent the danger is to prevent these rats coming in. A good deal of the talk about their being allowed in because of their valuable fur is moonshine. We have enough industries with which to engage our attention without bringing in musk rats. I entirely agree that they should not be allowed in in any shape or form.

The Minister can secure his object very easily. He says that musk rats should be admitted only to enable certain experiments to be carried out with a view to the extermination of these pests. The easiest way to secure that is for the Minister to get a few of his trappers to catch a few of the live musk rats in the country. He can then have experiments carried out as to the best methods to be adopted for their extermination. When all these rats have been exterminated, the problem will be ended and there will be no necessity to bring any rats in. I think that, under no circumstances, should musk rats be admitted. In that I agree with Senator Jameson. I think that Senator Counihan should withdraw his amendment and have another amendment introduced which would produce that result.

What I explained on a previous occasion was that we intended only to licence the keeping of musk rats for the purpose of scientific and biological research, as mentioned by Senator Counihan, and, secondly, for the purposes of the Zoological Gardens. In that connection, what I had in mind was that people might be anxious to know what a musk rat was like. Unless people know what they are like, we cannot get the proper help in exterminating them. I have heard since that it is doubtful if the Zoological Gardens would keep these rats, even if we asked them. I do not think they are anxious to have them. I should be quite willing to accept, in principle, Senator Counihan's amendment. The intention was to keep the rats for the purpose of experiment with a view to extermination. I had a letter to-day from a firm in Denmark giving what they say is a certain cure for the musk rat menace. It is something on the virus principle. It may be necessary, at some future time, to try to trap some of these rats alive and keep them with a view to seeing whether this method could be improved upon. I think we should at least get the power to keep them.

The section we are dealing with at present gives power to licence the keeping of musk rats. A different part of the Bill deals with their import. Senator Counihan has a later amendment to deal with that. I do not think that there will be any necessity to import these rats. I think that we could trap them alive and carry out experiments in that way. We were anxious to carry out an experiment on one of these rats and one was caught in Nenagh. However, he did not thrive well in confinement and, by the time we sent for him, he was dead. As time goes on, we may gain experience in dealing with them. If the Seanad were satisfied with the restriction that Sentaor Counihan proposes, I should be prepared to accept it but I would ask the Senator to withdraw it and let me bring in an amendment on Report Stage. The section which really should be amended is Section 11, which deals with the granting of licences. An amendment to that section would cover the keeping of rats and the import of them. Under Section 9, we could not deal with the import question. If we amended Section 11, it would settle the whole affair and restrict the giving of licences for the keeping of musk rats except for the purposes stated by Senator Counihan—biological or scientific research. If the Seanad is agreeable and if Senator Counihan's amendment is withdrawn, I shall bring in the necessary amendment on Report Stage.

Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Sections 9 to 16, inclusive, agreed to.
Amendment 2 (Senator Counihan) not moved.
Sections 17 to 38 and Title agreed to.
Bill reported without amendments.
Report stage fixed for Wednesday, 19th July.
Barr
Roinn