Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 2 Jul 1947

Vol. 34 No. 2

Agricultural and Fishery Products (Regulation of Export) Bill, 1947—Second Stage.

Question proposed "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

The object of this Bill is to replace and extend the scope of the Agricultural Products (Regulation of Export) Acts, 1933 and 1935, and certain provisions of the Emergency Powers (No. 224) Order, 1939, so as to enable me to regulate from time to time by Order the export of agricultural and fishery products.

The Acts mentioned are limited in scope and were planned to meet the special circumstances obtaining at the time of their enactment. The 1933 Act was designed to enable the Minister for Agriculture to regulate the export of agricultural products to such countries as had established any system of restriction or control on imports of agricultural products to that country. The 1935 Act enabled the Minister to regulate exports to countries which had made a trade agreement with this country. During the emergency, export control powers were found to be inadequate and, under Emergency Powers Orders, the Minister for Agriculture is given considerably wider powers in this matter than he possessed under the aforementioned Acts.

The object of the Emergency Powers Orders controlling exports is to enable the Government to maintain supplies and services essential to the life of the community and the Minister for Agriculture operates wide powers of control over the export of agricultural and fishery products. Foods in short supply are thus conserved. The object of the present Bill is, in the absence of such powers conferred by existing permanent legislation, to endow the Minister with powers to regulate exports—powers which, in the altered circumstances of our time, may be needed.

While I agree with the Minister that these provisions are to regulate exports in order to conserve foodstuffs in short supply, it is, perhaps, because of what is not in the Bill rather than what is in it that I want to say anything at all to the House. In regard to the methods by which our exports might be arranged and used to advantage, I want to say a few words. In dealing with a large part of our agricultural exports and almost all our fishery exports, it appears to me that we have to put ourselves into a new orientation. We have to see what method can be used to ensure that our marketing is done in a much better way than ever before. I would ask the Minister if he has considered what could be done by modern methods, particularly in respect of what is generally known as quick freezing, even where meat is concerned. It is highly desirable that we should ensure that the price we get for meat is comparable with the wholesale meat price in the country of import rather than in our own country.

I think there is a tremendous advantage to be gained in ensuring that we are able to sell our meat here, so to speak, as butchers' meat, and not frozen like the old method known as the Argentine method or the New Zealand method. Meat frozen by the old method destroyed the taste and the fibre of the product. The Minister will agree that there has been in recent years a tremendous advance in respect to methods known as quick-freezing and, as the result, it is possible to prove that under that method there is no loss of flavour, no loss in taste, no loss in substance and, in fact, no difference between the completely fresh product and that killed and treated in that way. It would be a tremendous advantage to us in respect to our meat if we could get butchers' price by reason of quick-freezing rather than merely live-meat price.

Whatever advantage there might be in respect of meat, an obvious advantage is to be gained in regard to vegetables, poultry, game, rabbits and even more so in respect to fish than anything else. This is a Bill both to regulate agricultural and fishery products, and I venture to suggest to the Minister first, in respect to fish, that they are the main problem. During the emergency the position was entirely different. From the point of view of the emergency problem, there was a real problem to deal with catches of fish in such a way that increased catches would not glut the market and bring down prices. I think I am correct in saying that in Kerry, in the early months of the year, there was a large catch of valuable black sole. If full advantage of that catch was taken, the market was glutted, prices were brought down and, in consequence, the fishermen were not willing to avail of it to the greatest extent. They were quite right. If they went out five days in the week they would probably get less than they would for two days, because of the way prices through the glut came down.

The shoal in the ordinary course moved from Kerry to the territory of Senator Hawkins and Senator O'Dea, in Galway. The same thing happened in Galway season and then the fish passed on to Killybegs and Donegal. If we are going to make a job of our fisheries it has to be dealt with on some basis of averaging catches over a period, and in such a way that the fixed charge for refrigeration is not going to be so high, by reason of the necessity to keep plants in Cork, in Kerry, in Galway and in Donegal. We must consider it, therefore, from the point of view of mobile plant. We must consider it from the point of view that a mobile plant is able to follow the fish.

I should like to take this advantage of inquiring from the Minister what views he has in that respect, and what policy he proposes to adopt. I think it is true to say that there is available, as a result of advances made in recent years, mobile refrigeration plants which could be utilised in the manner I suggest. It is common ground that necessity is the mother of invention and, so far as the warring nations were concerned, war necessity made them go further in regard to inventions than they would go in peace-time. War in the desert was one necessity that made very great advances in refrigeration. As a result there has been a tremendous advance in quick freezing and mobile refrigeration. It is possible to arrange now for a mobile plant to be available, which could be utilised at the particular area in which there was a "catch" at a particular time.

I am not clear about the Minister's control over the Sea Fisheries Association, but I hope he and his Department will ensure that considerable scope is given towards arriving at some method, by virtue of which we can utilise this new invention. I understand that such plants are operated on diesel oil. Córas Iompair Éireann and Cement Limited have converted their plants for the use of diesel oil. The fuel is available to do the job. From what has occurred I believe that there is something that might be termed a refrigerating lorry, which can do the job of a refrigerator, and then pass on the goods to something in the nature of a small furniture van, and be transported by rail or by road to the market or, what is much more important, they could be held for utilisation at the most suitable time.

In 1937 and 1938 a very small proportion of the available catches of west coast fish was used, because if all was used it would completely glut the market and there would be no possibility of dealing with it. As the situation appears to me, we must deal with it by some method that is going to average out over the whole year the available product, particularly in respect to black sole, for which a very high price is available during some months. It is during the first three months of the year that sole can be taken in substantial quantities in Kerry. It could be held—and I understand from technical people that it can —for an unlimited period in a mobile container. That would be a tremendous advantage as well as being an output for our fisheries.

One of the ways in which the Minister could assist, apart from direct intervention, is by saying a word in the ear of the Minister for Industry and Commerce. I understand that there is a duty of 50 per cent. on refrigeration plant. I do not think such plant is produced in this country. The duty must, therefore, be considered a customs duty as far as such plant is concerned. I understand that refrigeration has become one of the largest marketing schemes in the whole of America. A frozen fruit company has 750,000,000 dollars invested in the processing of food, and has enabled the product to be used by averaging over the whole year. It appears to me that there are great possibilities on these lines and that they are lines that should be developed and examined to the full.

I agree that speaking on technical lines I am referring to matters that are perhaps not directly germane to this Bill, but I should like to know what possibilities there are for perishable agricultural commodities being dealt with and particularly fish catches.

My principal concern with this Bill is in regard to export licences. I am sure that no one wants to deny the Minister's right to control and restrict the export of agricultural produce when he feels that it is essential to do so. Anybody who has had experience of licensing will, I am sure, want to see a different system adopted and will not be satisfied that the Minister should have sole control of the issue of licences through his Department. I do not want to discuss the economic war now, but I want to show how licences operated during those years. Export licences for fat beasts were worth £6 then, and export licences for store beasts were worth £5 each. Everybody connected with the cattle trade knows that to be a fact. The licences were issued in the first instance to people who had a quota for the stock they exported during a previous year. Possibly that was the fairest way that it could be done.

When the number that we could export became so restricted and when licences became so valuable, the Department even at that time should have decided that the first people entitled to licences were the producers of the cattle. They did not get them. The Department continued giving licences and I know that a big number of licences were issued to people who had no connection with the cattle trade to go down to Kerry and buy store cattle in Kerry for export. At that particular time a man could buy 20 cattle in Kerry, get 20 licences and could throw the cattle into the sea and be £50 the better of it. That is so. They could buy cattle in Cahirciveen and Killorglin at 30/- apiece and less and the licence was worth £4.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach

Is not this all ancient history?

I do not want to develop that but nobody will agree that the Minister for Agriculture, no matter who he is, or his Department, should be the sole arbiter as to who is to get licences and who is not to get licences. At the present time licences are being issued and have been issued for the last seven or eight years for the export of dairy cattle and in-calf heifers. During the eight years the national executive of the cattle trade in conjunction with the Department of Agriculture have been issuing these licences and I have not heard a single complaint from anybody about the issue of the licences. On Committee Stage I will table an amendment to have such a system introduced and I hope the Minister will agree with it. I know the Minister has no great love for the livestock trade.

Do not go too far, now.

And, I am sure, anything we say he is bound to turn it down. Still, if we keep going on we may get him to have a bit of sense later on when he has had more experience of what the cattle trade is doing. Nobody wants to deprive the Minister for Agriculture of the right to restrict or prohibit the export of agricultural produce when he finds it is necessary to do so. On that score, I support the Bill.

I have two remarks to make and one is again in connection with definitions. Section I has fine-combed our products to try to include everything of an agricultural or horticultural nature. I have been wondering what Department will be responsible for our marine products. This evening's paper gives an account of some fine fabrics prepared from seaweed. I have been thinking of carrageen moss and agar that has been produced from moss found on the west coast of Ireland during the emergency period. Carrageen moss, iodine, kelp and agar are very important products and under this Bill, which is an export Bill, the Minister, if they come within his bailiwick, might control the export of these marine products.

Senator Sweetman's speech on this Bill was, I think, entirely out of order because he dealt with the home market and home consumption, whereas the Bill deals with the control of the export of these products.

Is that criticism of the Chair?

I did not say it was a criticism of the Chair. I wanted to emphasise that it was my opinion and I think the text of the Senator's speech will bear me out in that, that he was referring to home production and consumption.

Not at all.

When he referred to the salvaging of fish, I think the Senator was referring to salvaging by quick freezing for home consumption. I do not see any likelihood in the near future of our developing an export market in fish and fish products, when there is such a scarcity of fish on the home market. I think quick freezing of fruit, vegetables and fish is quite effective. I do not think in respect of beef, fowl and poultry it is as effective. The principal thing I wish to say in connection with this all-embracing Section 1 is that I would like to see it still more comprehensive and to include these marine products. In connection with Section 3 (4) dealing with penalties, I think the penalty here is too low.

Senator Sweetman, in another debate this evening, referred to phraseology which we find in this Bill, that a person who gives information

"which is to his knowledge false or misleading in any material respect shall be guilty of an offence under the section and shall be liable on summary conviction thereof to a fine not exceeding £10."

I refer to that because the Senator this evening pointed out the difference between a person who commits an offence unknowingly and a person who commits one knowingly. Here is the case of a person who commits an offence by doing it himself, and knowingly makes a false and misleading declaration. The penalty is £10. I think it is too low for an offence which may involve hundreds of pounds' worth of material. It is the same penalty as that provided for the contravention of one of the provisions in connection with clean wool. These are the only points that I have to make on the Bill.

I come from one of the maritime counties. Notwithstanding the fact that Senator O'Donovan is in a very argumentative mood this evening, I wish to follow on the lines of my friend, Senator Sweetman. Of course, we are very interested in fish in my county. Senator Sweetman described the progress of a shoal of fish from Kerry to Donegal, but in doing so he hopped over 100 miles or so of the Clare coast. The unfortunate thing is that in my county we have not any means of catching fish. There were five points in the county where, in other days, canoes and currachs used to be employed to capture the very abundant supply of fish that is there. These currachs and canoes are not being used by the young men of to-day. There is one point, at Liscannor, where fish could be brought in if the pier there, started in the time of the British Government and never completed, could be utilised. The result is that a good fishing smack cannot enter there. The smacks can only fish in that area for two or three months of the year, and then they have to go round to Galway to be harboured for the winter. I think that the appropriate Government Department should spend some little money in removing the rocks in front of the pier. We could then start a fishing industry there. The two or three fishing smacks that went out there last year are rather small. Perhaps the Minister will bring the matter to the notice of the appropriate Department and have the position in connection with that pier examined. The extraordinary thing is that the fish caught along our coast cannot be found in any of the towns along the coast. The fish sold in those towns comes from Cahirciveen and sometimes from across the water. We have an abundant supply of fish along our own coast if only the local people got reasonable facilities to get at them and make them available for the people of the county.

Like other Senators I am in agreement that we have no option but to give the Minister this Bill. I want to avail of this opportunity to seek a little information regarding one or two points which I think have been very properly touched upon by some other Senators. I wonder if the Minister can give us any indication as to the possibilities there are of developing a trade in dead meat. One of the great advantages that, I believe, to be inherent in the tourist business is that it will enable us to get the top price for meat. For a long time I have been wondering whether it is impossible to do something more than has been done to sell much of the meat that we export as dead meat. It is not a new proposition.

I remember that when I was much younger than I am now I happened to be employed in the first real effort to develop a dead meat trade. The company concerned was adequately capitalised. To the best of my recollection, I think that the capital loss that was suffered eventually amounted to something between £750,000 and £1,000,000. I happened to be just an ordinary servant of that company, but I still carry with me memories of its operation. It may be of interest to say now that I think its failure was due to mismanagement rather than to any other cause. I remember the enthusiasm with which we greeted the establishment of that company—I refer to the Irish Packing Company— and the hopes we had of its development. I remember the disappointment we all felt—producers and workers alike—at its failure. Ever since I have been wondering whether some further effort ought not to be made to develop that trade, and so secure for the producers something more than they have been getting so far for their stock. I wonder whether the officials of the Department have kept their eye on that matter, especially in view of the changes that are occurring in markets, and whether there is not now a reasonable opportunity for restarting that industry and of developing it in the best interests of all concerned.

Again I wonder whether the Minister is in a position to give us any indication as to our prospects of developing a deep-sea fishing industry. I know that, for years, we have been looking at a plan taking shape. In the vocational school in Galway we have been allotted the task of training young men in certain branches of marine engineering and in Cork the vocational schools have been allotted another task, all with the idea of providing us with personnel technically equipped to engage in industry of the nature of deep-sea fishing. I do not know how many boys will have come out of these schools by now. I know that the results of their education are very commendable and I know that Irish Shipping, Limited, is particularly glad to get these boys and to take them in as cadets, but my point is that, by now, we should have adequate personnel to man a number of vessels capable of going afar and of remaining away for considerable periods. I wonder has the Department any information to give us regarding the position and the prospects of such an industry.

Senator Sweetman referred to the possibility of chilling or refrigeration plant. It is a long time now since Australia suffered its great depression in the failure of the wool market and switched over to the market in mutton. As a consequence of the failure of the wool market and their efforts to develop the mutton trade, a new system of meat chilling came in. Senator Sweetman has mentioned that developments in that field have now become so perfect that it is almost impossible for the ordinary man to say where meat carried thousands and thousands of miles in these specially equipped vessels differs from what we will describe as fresh meat. I particularly remember when what is so often referred to as the economic war was on, I frequently visited England and Scotland. I went to a good many fairs, markets and auctions to see what was happening and one of the things I particularly remember was the extent to which people there were switching over to chilled meat. Even doctors told me at that time that they were using chilled meat in the convalescent homes and had found it to be of quite excellent quality. I mention that to indicate the enormous strides made in the development of chilling plant.

There was no quick freezing then, either.

The products are not frozen at all. They are chilled to a degree, but not frozen in the accepted sense of the term. It is in that direction that the main development has come, and there seems to be no reason why we should not now be able to get vessels big enough to carry plant of that kind which would enable ships to go far and, if necessary, to stay out until they got a sufficient catch to make it worth their while to come in and to be able to land that catch in good order. It seems to me also that we might as well make up our minds that the market for fresh fish in the strict sense does not hold out much chance in Ireland. It is a very erratic market from two points of view—the matter of supply and the matter of demand. There is just one day in the week when one can rely on a reasonable demand. Supply is very erratic and demand is equally erratic, but there seems to be, both along our coast and inland, a desire for cured fish. There is a considerable opportunity—the statistics relating to the import of cured fish will give an idea of the extent of the market—for cured fish, and I should like to know whether the Department have that in mind, whether they have examined the efforts which have been made and have considered the causes of their failure and to what extent they think that whatever difficulties did exist have disappeared and to what extent they could be surmounted, if they still exist.

I do not think the suggestion made by Senator O'Donovan with regard to marine products and the advisability of including these within the domain of the Minister for Agriculture a wise suggestion. Anybody who has any knowledge of the products he mentioned will have no hesitation in saying that they are clearly products of an industrial nature and ought to remain as matters for the Minister for Industry and Commerce. However, as I say, we must give the Bill to the Minister, but, like Senator Sweetman, Senator Honan and other Senators, I should like to get some indication as to the possibilities of the development of a deep-sea fishing industry, a curing industry for fish and an export trade in dead meat.

The discussion on this Bill has undoubtedly been very interesting, and, while I would not dream, because, in the first place it would not be in order, and, in the second place, I would not want to do it of accusing the Chair of being rather lenient, I must confess that I found it fairly difficult to relate some of the points made by Senator Sweetman and Senator Ó Buachalla, with its provisions. My Estimates are at present before the Dáil for the Fishery Department, and quite a lot of what has been said here will, I am sure, be said in the discussion of these Estimates. The freezing of fish and making provision for dealing with periods of glut, the building up of an organisation for the disposal of fish, the activities of the Sea Fisheries Association, the desirability of encouraging fishermen down on the Clare coast, the efforts of my Department to encourage deep-sea fishing, the success or lack of success which has attended these efforts so far, what I think, in view of the new methods, of the establishment of a dead meat trade, as referred to by Senator Sweetman and by a number of other Senators— these are all very interesting, very useful and undoubtedly very important matters, but, at the same time, I think the Chair cannot take offence if I say that the Chair was more than lenient in allowing them to be raised. I was not trying to get agreement to proposals that had no relationship to the conditions prevailing there during the economic war. I was trying to get the House to give me legislation to replace power which I now enjoy under Emergency Powers Order. That is it in a nutshell. In the sale or disposal of most of our agricultural and fishery products to Britain, there has been only one customer since the war started, the British Ministry of Food, and so long as that condition of affairs remains, it is necessary that on our side we should regulate our exports to fit in with the arrangements on the other side.

I am not asking for these powers because I want the pleasure of exercising them—the pleasure that some members may think I get out of the power to interfere and probe into the business of any organisation. They are powers I already have and must have in the future, so long as the condition of affairs remains as it is now in Britain, to which we are sending the major portion of our surplus produce. In the case of fish, eggs, poultry, dead and alive, and down nearly the whole list of produce that is sold to the British Ministry of Food, there are times when they do not like to take these products from an unlimited number. As a matter of fact, they are very anxious that the number be as small as possible; and it is necessary for us to make this number sufficiently large to cover all those who have been legitimately in the trade. Senator Counihan may resent anyone in my Department having these powers, but I can assure him that it is a very good thing for the people engaged in this business that there is here a Minister and a Department, in the special circumstances that exist and for the creation of which they have no responsibility, that will try to widen out the source from which these commodities will be taken, so as to preserve the rights and the business of those who were previously engaged in dealing with these commodities.

That is all I am asking the House to give me. I thought there was nothing in the Bill which would entitle the House to ask me to come back again for the further stages, but that is a matter for Senators themselves and I cannot alter it. I suppose we will have other occasions on which we can discuss the very many interesting and important subjects that have been raised to-day. What I am seeking here is something of a much more limited nature and I hope the House will give me, not only the Second Reading but all the stages of this measure.

Question put and agreed to.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach

When is it proposed to take the next stage?

Am I not correct in thinking that the Minister has all these powers under the Supplies and Services (Temporary) Provisions Act, which does not expire until December 31st next?

That is so, but you never know what may happen between now and 31st December.

On a Bill of such simple content, would it not be possible to get agreement to dispose of it at once?

I would like the Minister to understand the position that some of us are in. All stages can be taken only by consent and it is a very serious thing for three of us to agree to that when there is no one else present. No one can take part in a debate on a Bill of this kind on a week's notice. I have always opposed taking all the stages the first time a Bill comes before us, unless the circumstances were very unusual, but we have always given the remaining stages on the second occasion. Senator Sweetman will agree with me that, as far as we are concerned, the remaining stages will be agreed to the next time, but we cannot speak for people who are not here. This is the first time this Bill has come before the House and I do not think we should be asked to take that responsibility.

We have until the 31st December, but there are certain Orders we are about to make and I would prefer to make them under this Bill when it becomes an Act rather than take advantage of the Emergency Powers Order. There is no power in the Bill we have not got already under the Emergency Powers Order and in that case the Seanad could make an exception.

We are all agreed that, where there are matters of contention, a Bill should not be put through on its first occasion before us, but where it is largely of simple content it should be agreed to, just as we were agreed in regard to the Trade Union Bill.

In the case of the Trade Union Bill, there were special circumstances. It is a very much more simple Bill than this and we were aware that the Minister concerned had to go to Paris on Government business. I suggest that this Bill be taken on the next sitting day and then I am not going to object to its being put through.

Committee Stage ordered for Wednesday, 9th July.
Barr
Roinn