I would like to thank the Cathaoirleach for allowing me to raise this matter tonight and to thank the Minister for attending.
After the explosion which demolished part of Raglan House, killing two people and injuring four, the Government requested Cremer and Warner to make a report which was duly submitted to the Minister for Energy last March. Dublin Gas, now Bord Gáis Éireann, have been tackling a major job of restoring public confidence in natural gas as a fuel, in the integrity of the gas grid and the company. There has been almost a complete change in the management of Dublin Gas. Bord Gáis Éireann and the Minister are to be congratulated on the interest they have shown in this matter. The Minister has been very conscious, I know, of the need to improve safety standards in the gas industry. I thank him for his interest in this matter.
There is no question that the new management had a great deal of ground to make up. Mr. Brendan Sommers, the receiver appointed to Dublin Gas by Bord Gáis Éireann in April 1986, made no secret of the poor state of the company's work practice and form of management when he took over. Routine maintenance was unknown, with the result that the pipe grid fell into serious disrepair. Cremer and Warner concluded that hazardous situations still exist in the grid. The problem is that no one knows where they are because of the lack of data on past repairs and replacement work. During the past year the Gas Company have replaced, I understand, about 27 kilometres of gas piping which compares with only 49 kilometres replaced in the 20 years up to 1987. The main replacement and upgrading, however, will be costly and time consuming.
I sincerely hope the necessary finances will be available to Bord Gáis Éireann to carry out this work. I believe that under the present planning £50 million will be spent over the next five years. It is a little difficult to see why the hazard problems referred to in the Cremer and Warner report are not tackled on a much shorter time scale. I understand the reasons given by the chief executive of the gas company are that the company quite simply do not know where they are and that they may be dealt with only when they become obvious through leaks. Nevertheless, it is evident that the gas company have revised operating procedures and more stringent regulations governing repair and maintenance work as well as intensified training. All these are being introduced. The gas company are committed to improving the whole area of gas distribution.
The new management knows that if there is another Raglan House the consequences for gas sales and for the future of the company will be dismal. This is the main reason I tabled this motion tonight. On the Adjournment some weeks ago I spoke about Dublin City air pollution. If we are to remove pollution from the city air we will have to use more smokeless fuel in the city. Recently Dublin Corporation surveyed 850 houses in Ballyfermot and 98 per cent of the houses surveyed were using solid fuel, mostly bituminous coal. I believe many people would be willing to use natural gas but there is a niggling fear in their minds that it is unsafe. It is essential that any doubt in the public mind in this area should be totally removed.
For all their reassurances about the safety and desirability of natural gas as a fuel for domestic consumers, the Government are not without fault when it comes to the implementation of the Cremer and Warner recommendations. The main recommendation, the appointment of a task force to examine all multi-storey buildings in the country liable to progressive collapse in the event of an accident, has been partially implemented. The task force were appointed but failed in their brief which was to examine all multi-storey buildings, blaming this on the limited time available to them and the scarcity of information supplied by the owners and administrators of multi-storey blocks around the country. Because they did not indentify individual vulnerable buildings, the Government were prevented from complying with another of the Cremer and Warner recommendations — that the owners of such buildings should be notified of the necessary remedial measures to be carried out. Neither did the Government comply with the recommendations that all local authorities should be informed of the task force's findings and that they, in turn, should inform owners of buildings identified as being liable to progressive collapse, or the remedial measures required.
The Government also failed to comply with a recommendation that did not depend on the task force. Launching the task force last September the Government said they would be introducing legislation before Christmas giving statutory backing to a recommendation that owners of buildings, deemed to be in need of examination, would have to submit a certificate showing that an appraisal and, where necessary, remedial works had been done. That legislation has not come before the Dáil or Seanad and I have to ask why.
Many of the lessons learned from the Cremer and Warner report and the Raglan House disaster seem to have faded together with the memory of the New Year's eve explosion. The Cremer and Warner report was unequivocal in stating that buildings with the same type of construction as Raglan House need to be identified urgently and measures taken to minimise access which could cause damage and progressive collapse. That has not happened and the only conclusion which can be drawn from that is that Raglan House could happen again. In view of this I earnestly ask the Minister to have the recommendations of the Cremer and Warner report and the task force implemented in full as a matter of urgency.