Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 7 Jun 1990

Vol. 125 No. 7

Adjournment Matter. - Rathkeale (Limerick) School.

I welcome the Minister to the House and thank him for taking the motion dealing with the construction of a community school at Rathkeale, County Limerick. At present there are two schools at second level in Rathkeale, a secondary school, which is run by the Sisters of Mercy, and a vocational school under the VEC. I want to pay a tribute to the Sisters of Mercy for the work they have done in Rathkeale and for the educational facilities they have provided for the community. They are part of our town. I would also like to pay tribute to the work of the vocational school over the past 30 years. It is no secret that this school sets a headline for other schools in the county as regards standard of discipline and the educational levels attained by their pupils. The same is true of Scoil Banríon na nAingil, the Convent of Mercy School; their educational achievements are beyond reproach. It is a further tribute to them that they can obtain those standards with the present facilities.

The areas to be served will extend far beyond the town of Rathkeale and will include areas like Croagh national school, Cappagh national school, Cool-Cappa national school, Kilfinny national school, Ahalin national school, Ballingarry national school, Ballingarry Convent and Granagh national school; Ahalin national school will be shared with Croom and Newcastle West. These schools are included as well as Rathkeale Convent national school and Rathkeale boys' school.

In 1966 the Department of Education suggested that joint facilities should be available to the schools. In 1967 — 23 years ago — the Convent of Mercy bought land to build a voluntary secondary school. The plans were sanctioned, land was purchased and a deposit paid to the builder. At this stage, the Department of Education asked the convent to change its plan on the basis that there were major plans for a school development in Rathkeale. The sisters stopped the project on the understanding that there was to be comprehensive plans for a school in Rathkeale. There was no word from the Department until 1973 when, because of the concern for the inadequate position of the facilities in Rathkeale, the staff of both Scoil Banríon na nAingil and the vocational school wrote to the Department and asked what were their plans. The then Minister said that there was an obvious need for rationalisation in Rathkeale and that a large central school would be built there; this was 1973, 17 years ago.

In 1975, 15 years ago, the Department of Education outlined its policy of amalgamation of such schools. The policy was the correct one for Rathkeale. The amalgamation of the schools would mean a better service for the pupils in that there would be a wider range of subjects available. For example, metal work is available in the vocational school but not in the convent school. Physics is available in the convent school in Rathkeale but not in the vocational school. This is just an example of how the shared approach would help the pupils.

On 29 May 1983 the then Minister decided to authorise the provision of a new community school and to incorporate the vocational and secondary schools. In December 1983 a joint committee was formed comprising the management of both schools, representatives of parents of both schools and the teaching staff of both schools. The objectives were fourfold: to expedite the programme as soon as possible; to ensure a good structure was provided for the school; to ensure that good facilities were available and that the project would be completed as soon as possible.

The committee requested a progress report from the Department at the end of 1984 but no reply was forthcoming. In 1985 a site was identified in the area of the vocational school and negotiations were entered into. The site was purchased. At this time a local company suggested that the Department purchase some of their land at a preferential rate for use as playing fields. The Department failed to do this and I was very disappointed at the time having championed the suggestion.

In 1986 a schedule of accommodation was agreed. A draft plan was finalised in 1988 and everything seemed to be ready. In June 1988 Rathkeale County Council met the Minister for Education and were informed by her that the school was in the top five for construction. In early 1989 the draft was sent back requesting comprehensive changes. This was submitted in early January 1990. All the suggested changes were included in the draft plan so there is no reason this cannot be progressed to the next stage, which is the development of sketch schemes.

In the convent school the classes are held in prefabricated classrooms. There is no permanent school structure. The weather is a big problem with prefabs. On the one hand, great effort is required to heat the prefabs and, on the other hand, it is very difficult to teach in periods of very warm weather. There is a very busy road to the local factory and noise is a problem. The prefabs are very old. Some of them are there since 1960 and cost a lot to maintain. They require replacement. During the Easter holidays £2,000 was spent by the convent to repair the prefabs. I understand that much of this money will be recoverable so the Department, by expediting the decision to build a school, will put an end to money going down the drain which is what patching up the prefabs amounts to. There is worry about storm damage because a lot of the prefabs are now rotten and there was extensive storm damage earlier this year. The prefabs are quite scattered and pupils must cross yards and a main road to go to certain classes. They often get wet in bad weather several times a day and this is totally unacceptable in 1990.

Rathkeale, as the second biggest town in the county, deserves proper educational facilities. Changes in demographic patterns are no excuse for not building a school in Rathkeale. The population in that area is increasing. The population west of the town is decreasing because of emigration and so on. Neither is the drop in birth rate an excuse not to build a school. These excuses have been put forward on a few occasions as reasons for looking again at the situation.

Rathkeale deserves proper educational facilities. There are 450 pupils awaiting the decision of the Minister. When will the Department process the plan to the sketch stage? This is what the people of Rathkeale are waiting for. I am sure, like any efficient organisation, the Department have outlined a timescale to complete this project. I ask the Minister to outline for us the projected completion dates of stage four, which is working drawings for the school, stage five, the bill of quantities and stage six, the tenders. I thank the Minister and look forward to his reply.

The planning of this scheme has reached stage two, the outline scheme stage of my Department's design team procedures. However, in common with all school building projects the Rathkeale project is being reviewed in the context of demographic trends and projected pupil enrolments for both the short and long term. I have to disagree vehemently with the Senator when he says that demographic trends are not important.

Not in this instance. The overall Limerick demographic changes are not important to this issue.

The Senator will see in a moment that demographic trends in the Limerick area have been quite dramatic and we have to take this factor into account. However, the project was originally planned to cater for 500 pupil places and current enrolment at the centre is 452 pupils. The Senator will be aware of the declining demographic pattern in every county which has made it essential to review the project very carefully. In County Limerick the decrease in the annual birth rate for the period 1980-1988 was a whopping 21 per cent and indications are that the decline will continue.

When this review is completed and the pupil numbers to be catered for in the long term are established, it will be necessary to prepare a new schedule of accommodation. This, in turn, will necessitate some alteration to the plan and design of the project by the design team. It will be appreciated, therefore, that any changes required will arise from a careful reassessment of future requirements and I am satisfied that the new school when completed will meet the needs of the community for the foreseeable future.

A full range of facilities will be available for the courses to be conducted and for the numbers of pupils who will enrol there.

Every effort will be made to have the review of requirements completed as soon as possible so that planning can proceed without undue delay.

I am very unhappy with the response of the Minister. He has not answered one of my questions. He has given no reason why the convent school should be left in prefabs some of which are over 30 years old. It is disgraceful in 1990 that anybody should have to teach children in prefabs or that pupils should have to be taught in prefabricated structures which are over 30 years old. What the Minister said is that the whole thing will start all over again and it looks as if it will be another 30 years before we have a school in Rathkeale. I will bring this up over and over again——

Acting Chairman

The Senator can ask a question but he cannot debate the matter.

I totally agree with the Senator about the deplorable prefabs that exist in this school and elsewhere. I remind him that this is the legacy of a Coalition Government who did not carry out proper planning, who went wild on costs they allowed for school buildings and made no effort whatsoever to deal with the deplorable situation over a four year period. We are now left with the remnants of a very bad policy adopted by two Coalition Governments. There are perfabs in the school in my home town in Gort and in too many schools around the country. If we were to take on board the proposals that the Senator has made here today we would spend taxpayers money very foolishly——

It is not foolish to build a school in Rathkeale.

I know the facts are not very nice but we would be spending taxpayers' money on a school which is not needed in Rathkeale. The fact of the matter is that in ten to 15 years time the post-primary school-going population of Rathkeale will be significantly lower than what it was when this school was originally initiated. We must take cognisance of that fact and also of the fact that the days of building Rolls Royce second level schools are over.

We approved a school for Clifden in my constituency this week. That school had been planned to go ahead four years ago at cost of £200,000 more than what we have now contracted to have it built. That is a scandalous waste. There is no diminution in the quality of the building. That is a shocking reflection on previous Governments who ruled over that kind of waste of taxpayers' money.

That is why we have the best educational facilities in Europe with the highest pupil-teacher ratio.

Unfortunately, many of the people we educated are outside the country because of bad planning and spending. I accept that the position in Rathkeale is not good and we are endeavouring to correct it as quickly as possible. The Senator's colleagues, Deputies Collins and Noonan, are doing their utmost to ensure that progress is made as quickly as possible.

The Seanad adjourned at 2.20 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Wednesday, 13 June 1990.

Barr
Roinn