Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 1 Nov 1990

Vol. 126 No. 9

Adjournment Matter. - Hirschfeld Centre, Dublin.

I would like to welcome the Minister and say that I hope he will have some positive news for us today. The matter I wish to raise is the need for the Minister for the Environment to set in motion forthwith the necessary machinery for allocating appropriate public funding from the national lottery for the rebuilding of the Hirschfeld Centre in Dublin. I would like to divide my time. I will be taking about ten minutes and then, perhaps, give two minutes to Senator Avril Doyle, two minutes to Senator Upton and two minutes to Senator Shane Ross. The Progressive Democrats indicated they would like two minutes and there is a possibility that Fianna Fáil, may require time. I have had positive indications of support from them, but I do not know if there is anybody available at the moment.

This is a reiteration of a motion I placed before the Seanad on the Adjournment of 2 November 1988. I would like to refer anybody who is interested to that debate because therein I lay out the origins of the Hirschfeld Centre in Dublin, which is the gay community and social services centre. Therefore, it comes very clearly within the remit of national lottery funding. There is an active application for funding with the Department of the Environment and there is a great deal of money available through the lottery. On the last occasion Minister Connolly indicated that he regretted he was not able to give money because it had already been allocated and there was none left.

I have before me records of the latest allocations of money from the national lottery and it makes very interesting reading. A lot of the projects are very worthy. Page after page shows allocations to the GAA, scout dens and golf clubs. I am not at all impugning these allocations but hundreds and hundreds of thousands of pounds are allocated in this way. If no money is made available to the Hirschfeld Centre it will raise certain questions about the priorities of the Government. I make this point: money invested in the Hirschfeld Centre is well and wisely invested.

During the career of the Hirschfeld Centre we published 250,000 leaflets on sexual hygiene with particular regard to AIDS. Ireland has a different profile with regard to this disease to any other country in Europe and it is acknowledged at Government level that a large measure of the credit for this devolves upon the Hirschfeld Centre because of this information campaign. If one takes into account the fact that every person who does not get AIDS saves the Exchequer £35,000 a year, regardless of any delicacy or hesitancy on the part of certain Government Ministers, the crude fact of economics would indicate that this is a very good investment.

I would like to draw the attention of the House to the fact, for example, that the Danish Government have taken this notion very clearly on board. Time does not permit me to go through every other country in Europe, but during the summer when I was at an international meeting on the Convention on Human Rights I met the former Minister for Education of Denmark, Mrs. Dorte Bennedsen. I discussed this matter with her and I have before me today a resolution of the Danish Folketinget, their parliament, which in 1988 granted £780,000 to the national gay organisation for its work on AIDS. A second resolution grants 1,500,000 Kroner directly for social and recreational services to the gay organisation, quoting principally the importance of this facility in the fight against AIDS. It should be fairly clear how this is done.

The gay population is a diverse population. It is not easy to contact and through a group like the Hirschfeld Centre you have concentrated a reservoir of people who are otherwise difficult to reach. It is possible to saturate that population group with information on subjects like health, safe sex techniques and so on. It is for this reason that the Danish Government made this massive allocation of funding. So I would say again that the money is there and if we do not get the money, I will not be satisfied. I will have to ask, is there some kind of mental block on the part of some Government Ministers? I say that with some regret. I believe most people in the Government parties are decent people. It is interesting, however, that all of the unfortunate remarks that have been made, such as the description of myself as a pervert, such as the unfortunate remarks made yesterday, emanated from the Government side. This is an unhealthy context in which to fight a battle for funding for a very worthy project.

There is a political aspect to this too. I would like to place very clearly on the record of the House that I have overwhelming support not only in this House, as was demonstrated by the last debate, but also in the other House. For example, I received on 12 April 1990 a warm letter of endorsement from the then Tánaiste, Brian Lenihan. I have also before me a letter from Mr. Desmond O'Malley, TD, indicating support for lottery funding, dated 12 December 1989. I have before me a letter of 10 November 1989 from Alan Dukes, TD, indicating the same thing. I have a strong endorsement from Dick Spring, TD, indicating the same thing of 2 November 1989 and I have, dated 30 November 1989, a similar strong endorsement from Proinsias De Rossa, TD. In other words, the then second in command of the Government, the Leaders of all the parties, including a partner in Government, have indicated massive endorsement for funding for this project. So, it is a matter of some puzzlement to me that we may again — perhaps I am anticipating unfairly — be facing a situation where funding will not be made available.

I would like to place on the record of the House that I am committed to the reopening of this centre. I consider it a matter of national importance. The Minister may, or may not, be aware that I regularly do charity work. I have raised very considerable sums of money; I have raised a couple of hundred thousand pounds for different charities. On Sunday I will be doing a show for a very worthy cause which will raise £15,000 in one night. This is a one-man show based on the works of James Joyce. I will regret if, in January, I have to cancel every other fund raising activity to raise funds for causes which find it difficult to get money, in a difficult situation, and devote myself entirely in the coming year to raising money here, in England and in America, through the promotion of this show to open the centre, but open it I will. It will be embarrassing to have to ask a Government Minister, who has not been able to provide any money, to attend the opening of such a centre, but I will do so in order to heap coals of fire on his or her head.

I would like to place on the record of the House the fact that, as a member of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Women's Rights, I raised this issue. In this Administration and in the last, that committee unanimously adopted as part of their brief the question of discrimination against gay people as a parallel discrimination to that against women. As a result of this, the chairperson of that committee has written, at the direction of the committee, to the Minister for the Environment, to the Minister for Health and to the Taoiseach indicating that they require money from the lottery to be made available. I would remind the Minister, and the House, that this is the committee who have been given the responsibility of prioritising lottery funding by the Taoiseach.

In the light of all these circumstances, in the light also of the fact that the application I made subsequent to the last debate was prioritised by the appropriate committee, was endorsed by this House, was endorsed massively by the Leaders of every political party and was then approved by Dublin Corporation for £50,000, it will be quite inexplicable to me in any terms, other than that of a curious mental block, if no money is made available for what this House has decided is a project of extraordinary merit.

I rise to support the request, fully aware of the fact that much of the prejudice towards the gay community in Ireland results from fear and ignorance on the part of the main body of our community. The best way of overcoming prejudices is by providing information and knowledge so that tolerance and understanding of minorities — in this case the gay community — can result. It was said previously that we can measure our commitment to democracy by how we treat minorities in our community. I am afraid we all stand indicted in this case if that adage is, in fact, true.

I would ask the Minister to take on board what has been said today, and what was said two years ago, and have a serious look at the points being made. It is not in the interest of the gay community that we should have to come in here time and time again to make their case, to single them out for separate treatment from the rest of our community because of neglect by the Government. It is not a question of positive discrimination. All we are looking for is the same treatment for this group of our citizens as is meted out to their fellow citizens. They may have a different sexual orientation and that is very difficult for many people to understand because they fear it, but this does not mean that we, as politicians and legislators, can renege on our responsibility to this minority group.

I urge the Minister to find the money from the lottery funds and, with his colleague, the Minister for Health, ensure proper funding on an ongoing basis for this centre that provides such a positive environment in which gay people can meet. I laud the excellent work they do on AIDS prevention and the information they disseminate on this topic. We do not have to develop that here and I do not have time to do so in two minutes. The centre provides that excellent service which is unrecognised, apparently, by the Government. I also laud the parents' inquiry service the centre runs. This is a unique service which helps parents of gay young people to come to terms with the situation that exists in relation to their son or daughter.

I lend my full support to the case that has been put before the Minister this afternoon and I hope we will not have to come back at some point in the future to reiterate a case that really stands on its own merits and should not need specific underlining in this way. It tells a tale on all of us that we have to come back a second time arising out of what can only be put down as neglect by the Government in this most important area.

I, too, an happy to rise to support Senator Norris's plea. It is a pity in many ways that the Senator is forced again this year to come into the House to try to highlight this matter. The destruction of the centre appears to have arisen from an appalling type of prejudice where people maliciously damaged the premises. In many ways that prejudice has arisen through some of the values which exist in the community. We can go some way towards rectifying that by giving lottery funds to help restore the centre.

The centre provides a very valuable service. It serves a real need by way of support for a minority group who have been subjected to a lot of abuse over the years. It also extends that support to their families, and that has been very valuable. I think everybody will agree that it has made an outstanding contribution in the attitude and the approach it took to the problem of AIDS here. It was very advanced and set a headline for the rest of the community in how it addressed that problem, in the initiatives it took and in the speed with which it took those initiatives. Indeed, as Senator Norris said, for every person who is saved from AIDS one is talking of a saving of £35,000. I do not think it is easy or wise to try to quantify the number of people who have been saved by the centre but everybody will admit that that number has to be a very significant one. Even if one put a money value on it, the centre is more than a very good investment.

We must face up to the problems experienced by the homosexual community. The centre has made a very valuable contribution in addressing the problems. I urge the Minister to accede to Senator Norris's request. It is one of the few occasions when everybody appears to be in agreement with Senator Norris, from Dublin Corporation to the leaders of all the major political parties, including the former Tánaiste.

It is a pity that this is the second time in two years that Senator Norris has had to raise this issue in the House. I cannot help coming to the conclusion that the reason this project has not been given funds is a political decision rather than a decision made on the merits of the application which has been made to this House and to the national lottery. My own belief is that if this plea was treated on its merits the money would be granted, because the Hirschfeld Centre, and the gay community, have done work which is certainly beyond the call of duty. They have certainly done plenty of work which the Government should have done and could have done. I risk being repetitive, but in the area of AIDS, and in the area of the telephone counselling service, the gay community have been doing a job the Government should have been doing. The Government are taking advantage of the fact that the gay community are doing this job. It is not something the Government can ignore and to give a small grant towards these services would certainly be a start.

Senator Norris tells me that the telephone counselling service dealt with 40,000 calls in the past ten years. That is an enormous number of calls. It is certainly a service which the Government can be very grateful to the gay community for. We should look again at the positive work of the Hirschfeld Centre. I am very privileged to be one of the few Member's of this House to visit this centre. While it provides a positive environment in which people can enjoy their leisure time, what we have got to look at is the positive side of the work this group, and this centre, have done for the community as a whole, and not just for themselves. Therefore, the Government have a duty to consider this particular application as a special one.

I wish to thank Senators for raising this matter and allowing me to explain the position under the amenities and recreation facilities grant scheme. Towards the end of last year we amalgamated a scheme with the Department of Education for recreational facilities. An enormous number of applications were received and these applications were processed by the local authorities. Over 4,000 applications were received in my Department from all local authorities. The total amount involved was £165 million. The total amount of the grant allocation was £6.5 million, Senators can understand that there would be many very desirable projects that we would like to include but unfortunately, we were unable to do so. In allocating the available £6.5 million we had at first to consider the eligibility of the projects under the general criteria for the scheme. We had to look into all the circumstances in regard to that. I do not know — and I am not trying to sidestep the issue — whether these schemes come under my Department or under the Department of Health.

Late in 1988 we received an application for the project at Hirschfeld but it was a late one. We received an application processed by Dublin Corporation for £50,000. I am not clear if it complies with the regulations for the scheme as laid down in the Department of the Environment.

May I interrupt the Minister on this. It was passed by the Department of Environment. I have that on record and it was approved by Dublin Corporation for £50,000. That is a matter of clear record and I have it on the files.

It was passed by Dublin Corporation. There were a number of schemes to which I would like to have been able to allocate finance, but we had to allocate the money available to us on a regional basis throughout the country. In general, it can be said that the £6.5 million was allocated to each county on a fair basis in relation to the amount of the money we had available to us. I admit that there were projects even in my own county that we would like to have seen included but with only £6.5 million available to us Senators can understand the position.

We will keep the application in mind and see what we can do when further funding becomes available. I regret I cannot give the Senator a more positive reply in regard to that. The Senator will appreciate that. I am not ruling it out in the future. There may be room there for tidying up the application and I will discuss it later with the Senator. I am not saying there is anything wrong with the application and I fully accept the work that has been done. I have no objection in regard to that, and I will keep the application in mind. I must point out that we were in a very difficult position because when the applications were referred to the local authorities we did not believe so many applications would pour in to us.

The Minister expected the local authorities to screen them, to do the dirty work, but they did not play ball.

The local authorities over the years have been looking for powers. We gave them powers and they shied away.

They are given politically unpalatable jobs at times.

When local authorities get the power they are inclined then not to take it in hand, but I do not want to go down that road now. I hope that when funds become available we can help out in the future in relation to this project.

I would like to thank the Minister for the positive offer of assistance and to say one thing, that it is a unique project, a national project, and within the terms of Dublin city there is funding for a scout den of £40,000. It is a question of priorities. This is a very valuable national project. It raises some questions of prioritisation, but I very gladly accept the Minister's kind offer of some technical assistance.

The Seanad adjourned at 4.40 p.m. until 4 p.m. on Wednesday, 14 November 1990.

Barr
Roinn